通过感官刺激影响梦境:系统回顾

IF 11.2 1区 医学 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Leila Salvesen , Elena Capriglia , Martin Dresler , Giulio Bernardi
{"title":"通过感官刺激影响梦境:系统回顾","authors":"Leila Salvesen ,&nbsp;Elena Capriglia ,&nbsp;Martin Dresler ,&nbsp;Giulio Bernardi","doi":"10.1016/j.smrv.2024.101908","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Sleep is typically considered a state of disconnection from the environment, yet instances of external sensory stimuli influencing dreams have been reported for centuries. Explaining this phenomenon could provide valuable insight into dreams' generative and functional mechanisms, the factors that promote sleep continuity, and the processes that underlie conscious awareness. Moreover, harnessing sensory stimuli for dream engineering could benefit individuals suffering from dream-related alterations. This PRISMA-compliant systematic review assessed the current evidence concerning the influence of sensory stimulation on sleep mentation. We included 51 publications, of which 21 focused on auditory stimulation, ten on somatosensory stimulation, eight on olfactory stimulation, four on visual stimulation, two on vestibular stimulation, and one on multimodal stimulation. Furthermore, nine references explored conditioned associative stimulation: six focused on targeted memory reactivation protocols and three on targeted lucid reactivation protocols. The reported frequency of stimulus-dependent dream changes across studies ranged from 0 to ∼80%, likely reflecting a considerable heterogeneity of definitions and methodological approaches. Our findings highlight a lack of comprehensive understanding of the mechanisms, functions, and neurophysiological correlates of stimulus-dependent dream changes. We suggest that a paradigm shift is required for meaningful progress in this field.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":49513,"journal":{"name":"Sleep Medicine Reviews","volume":"74 ","pages":"Article 101908"},"PeriodicalIF":11.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1087079224000121/pdfft?md5=9739c4bbe7094e5a8b3953dd3cb13675&pid=1-s2.0-S1087079224000121-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Influencing dreams through sensory stimulation: A systematic review\",\"authors\":\"Leila Salvesen ,&nbsp;Elena Capriglia ,&nbsp;Martin Dresler ,&nbsp;Giulio Bernardi\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.smrv.2024.101908\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Sleep is typically considered a state of disconnection from the environment, yet instances of external sensory stimuli influencing dreams have been reported for centuries. Explaining this phenomenon could provide valuable insight into dreams' generative and functional mechanisms, the factors that promote sleep continuity, and the processes that underlie conscious awareness. Moreover, harnessing sensory stimuli for dream engineering could benefit individuals suffering from dream-related alterations. This PRISMA-compliant systematic review assessed the current evidence concerning the influence of sensory stimulation on sleep mentation. We included 51 publications, of which 21 focused on auditory stimulation, ten on somatosensory stimulation, eight on olfactory stimulation, four on visual stimulation, two on vestibular stimulation, and one on multimodal stimulation. Furthermore, nine references explored conditioned associative stimulation: six focused on targeted memory reactivation protocols and three on targeted lucid reactivation protocols. The reported frequency of stimulus-dependent dream changes across studies ranged from 0 to ∼80%, likely reflecting a considerable heterogeneity of definitions and methodological approaches. Our findings highlight a lack of comprehensive understanding of the mechanisms, functions, and neurophysiological correlates of stimulus-dependent dream changes. We suggest that a paradigm shift is required for meaningful progress in this field.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49513,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Sleep Medicine Reviews\",\"volume\":\"74 \",\"pages\":\"Article 101908\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":11.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-02-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1087079224000121/pdfft?md5=9739c4bbe7094e5a8b3953dd3cb13675&pid=1-s2.0-S1087079224000121-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Sleep Medicine Reviews\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1087079224000121\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sleep Medicine Reviews","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1087079224000121","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

睡眠通常被认为是一种与环境脱节的状态,然而几个世纪以来,关于外部感官刺激影响梦境的报道却屡见不鲜。对这一现象进行解释,可以让人们深入了解梦的生成和功能机制、促进睡眠连续性的因素以及意识觉醒的基础过程。此外,利用感官刺激进行梦境工程可使梦境相关改变的患者受益。这篇符合 PRISMA 标准的系统综述评估了目前有关感官刺激对睡眠思维影响的证据。我们收录了 51 篇文献,其中 21 篇侧重于听觉刺激,10 篇侧重于体感刺激,8 篇侧重于嗅觉刺激,4 篇侧重于视觉刺激,2 篇侧重于前庭刺激,1 篇侧重于多模式刺激。此外,9 篇参考文献探讨了条件性联想刺激:6 篇侧重于有针对性的记忆再激活方案,3 篇侧重于有针对性的清醒再激活方案。不同研究报告的梦境变化频率从0到80%不等,这可能反映了不同定义和方法的差异。我们的研究结果凸显了人们对刺激依赖性梦境变化的机制、功能和神经生理学相关因素缺乏全面的了解。我们认为,要想在这一领域取得有意义的进展,就必须转变研究范式。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Influencing dreams through sensory stimulation: A systematic review

Sleep is typically considered a state of disconnection from the environment, yet instances of external sensory stimuli influencing dreams have been reported for centuries. Explaining this phenomenon could provide valuable insight into dreams' generative and functional mechanisms, the factors that promote sleep continuity, and the processes that underlie conscious awareness. Moreover, harnessing sensory stimuli for dream engineering could benefit individuals suffering from dream-related alterations. This PRISMA-compliant systematic review assessed the current evidence concerning the influence of sensory stimulation on sleep mentation. We included 51 publications, of which 21 focused on auditory stimulation, ten on somatosensory stimulation, eight on olfactory stimulation, four on visual stimulation, two on vestibular stimulation, and one on multimodal stimulation. Furthermore, nine references explored conditioned associative stimulation: six focused on targeted memory reactivation protocols and three on targeted lucid reactivation protocols. The reported frequency of stimulus-dependent dream changes across studies ranged from 0 to ∼80%, likely reflecting a considerable heterogeneity of definitions and methodological approaches. Our findings highlight a lack of comprehensive understanding of the mechanisms, functions, and neurophysiological correlates of stimulus-dependent dream changes. We suggest that a paradigm shift is required for meaningful progress in this field.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Sleep Medicine Reviews
Sleep Medicine Reviews 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
20.10
自引率
3.80%
发文量
107
期刊介绍: Sleep Medicine Reviews offers global coverage of sleep disorders, exploring their origins, diagnosis, treatment, and implications for related conditions at both individual and public health levels. Articles comprehensively review clinical information from peer-reviewed journals across various disciplines in sleep medicine, encompassing pulmonology, psychiatry, psychology, physiology, otolaryngology, pediatrics, geriatrics, cardiology, dentistry, nursing, neurology, and general medicine. The journal features narrative reviews, systematic reviews, and editorials addressing areas of controversy, debate, and future research within the field.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信