动能轨道轰击的可行性

L. Koene, N.V.H. Schouten, R. Savelsberg
{"title":"动能轨道轰击的可行性","authors":"L. Koene, N.V.H. Schouten, R. Savelsberg","doi":"10.2478/jms-2024-0001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n In this paper, the possible impact effects of orbital bombardment systems and their feasibility are studied. These effects are the projectile penetration into concrete and steel targets and seismic effects. The equations of motion for the re-entry of a projectile and the penetration were solved numerically. The projectile penetration is modelled using the Alekseevskii–Tate model. By varying the altitude (h), projectile length (L), manoeuvre velocity (ΔV) and the target properties, the flight time (t), earthquake magnitude (M) and penetration depth (P) are calculated. The calculations show that the impact of a tungsten alloy rod with a length of 8 m and a 0.4 m diameter results in an earthquake with a seismic magnitude of only 2.5 on the Richter scale. For concrete, the optimal result is obtained for a projectile with a length of 0.56 m. It penetrates 1.79 m with a minimal ΔV trajectory. These results show that a kinetic orbital bombardment system is not feasible without major technological developments, the impact angle being a bottleneck of the concept. Moreover, one has to accept very high costs. Without any means to change the attitude of the projectile, using ICBMs or bombers shows a better penetration performance than re-entry.\n \n \n \n \n Weapons in orbit may provide a strategic advantage. However, they are restricted by international space laws.\n \n \n Impact angle of the projectile is a bottleneck for kinetic orbital bombardment.\n \n \n Larger impact angles can be achieved, but at the expense of a larger mass-to-orbit.\n \n \n A hypersonic drag device may be used to optimise the impact angle and thus improve the system.\n \n \n Alternative projectile delivery methods (Bomber, Intercontinental Ballistic Missile (ICBM)) show better performance for both steel and concrete targets.\n \n \n Essentially, only penetration phenomena matter because the seismic effects are not significant. Therefore, orbital bombardment systems don’t even resemble weapons of mass destruction (WMD).\n \n \n Given their limited effect, destroying a particular target requires a guidance and flight control system, which, given the high velocities, may not be feasible.\n \n \n","PeriodicalId":511613,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Military Studies","volume":"8 11","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Feasibility of kinetic orbital bombardment\",\"authors\":\"L. Koene, N.V.H. Schouten, R. Savelsberg\",\"doi\":\"10.2478/jms-2024-0001\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n In this paper, the possible impact effects of orbital bombardment systems and their feasibility are studied. These effects are the projectile penetration into concrete and steel targets and seismic effects. The equations of motion for the re-entry of a projectile and the penetration were solved numerically. The projectile penetration is modelled using the Alekseevskii–Tate model. By varying the altitude (h), projectile length (L), manoeuvre velocity (ΔV) and the target properties, the flight time (t), earthquake magnitude (M) and penetration depth (P) are calculated. The calculations show that the impact of a tungsten alloy rod with a length of 8 m and a 0.4 m diameter results in an earthquake with a seismic magnitude of only 2.5 on the Richter scale. For concrete, the optimal result is obtained for a projectile with a length of 0.56 m. It penetrates 1.79 m with a minimal ΔV trajectory. These results show that a kinetic orbital bombardment system is not feasible without major technological developments, the impact angle being a bottleneck of the concept. Moreover, one has to accept very high costs. Without any means to change the attitude of the projectile, using ICBMs or bombers shows a better penetration performance than re-entry.\\n \\n \\n \\n \\n Weapons in orbit may provide a strategic advantage. However, they are restricted by international space laws.\\n \\n \\n Impact angle of the projectile is a bottleneck for kinetic orbital bombardment.\\n \\n \\n Larger impact angles can be achieved, but at the expense of a larger mass-to-orbit.\\n \\n \\n A hypersonic drag device may be used to optimise the impact angle and thus improve the system.\\n \\n \\n Alternative projectile delivery methods (Bomber, Intercontinental Ballistic Missile (ICBM)) show better performance for both steel and concrete targets.\\n \\n \\n Essentially, only penetration phenomena matter because the seismic effects are not significant. Therefore, orbital bombardment systems don’t even resemble weapons of mass destruction (WMD).\\n \\n \\n Given their limited effect, destroying a particular target requires a guidance and flight control system, which, given the high velocities, may not be feasible.\\n \\n \\n\",\"PeriodicalId\":511613,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Military Studies\",\"volume\":\"8 11\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-02-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Military Studies\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2478/jms-2024-0001\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Military Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2478/jms-2024-0001","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文研究了轨道轰击系统可能产生的影响及其可行性。这些效应包括弹丸穿透混凝土和钢制目标以及地震效应。对弹丸重返大气层和穿透的运动方程进行了数值求解。弹丸穿透采用 Alekseevski-Tate 模型。通过改变高度 (h)、弹丸长度 (L)、机动速度 (ΔV) 和目标特性,计算出飞行时间 (t)、震级 (M) 和穿透深度 (P)。计算结果表明,一根长度为 8 米、直径为 0.4 米的钨合金棒在撞击后产生的地震震级仅为里氏 2.5 级。对于混凝土而言,长度为 0.56 米的弹丸可获得最佳结果,它以最小的 ΔV 轨迹穿透 1.79 米。这些结果表明,如果没有重大的技术发展,动能轨道轰击系统是不可行的。此外,我们还必须接受非常高昂的成本。在无法改变弹丸姿态的情况下,使用洲际弹道导弹或轰炸机比重返大气层具有更好的穿透性能。 轨道武器可提供战略优势。然而,它们受到国际空间法的限制。 弹丸的撞击角是动能轨道轰炸的瓶颈。 可以实现更大的弹着角,但代价是更大的在轨质量。 可以使用高超音速阻力装置来优化弹着角,从而改进系统。 其他弹丸投射方法(轰炸机、洲际弹道导弹(ICBM))对钢铁和混凝土目标都有更好的性能。 从本质上讲,只有穿透现象才是重要的,因为地震效应并不显著。因此,轨道轰炸系统甚至不像大规模杀伤性武器(WMD)。 鉴于其效果有限,摧毁特定目标需要制导和飞行控制系统,而鉴于速度较高,这可能并不可行。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Feasibility of kinetic orbital bombardment
In this paper, the possible impact effects of orbital bombardment systems and their feasibility are studied. These effects are the projectile penetration into concrete and steel targets and seismic effects. The equations of motion for the re-entry of a projectile and the penetration were solved numerically. The projectile penetration is modelled using the Alekseevskii–Tate model. By varying the altitude (h), projectile length (L), manoeuvre velocity (ΔV) and the target properties, the flight time (t), earthquake magnitude (M) and penetration depth (P) are calculated. The calculations show that the impact of a tungsten alloy rod with a length of 8 m and a 0.4 m diameter results in an earthquake with a seismic magnitude of only 2.5 on the Richter scale. For concrete, the optimal result is obtained for a projectile with a length of 0.56 m. It penetrates 1.79 m with a minimal ΔV trajectory. These results show that a kinetic orbital bombardment system is not feasible without major technological developments, the impact angle being a bottleneck of the concept. Moreover, one has to accept very high costs. Without any means to change the attitude of the projectile, using ICBMs or bombers shows a better penetration performance than re-entry. Weapons in orbit may provide a strategic advantage. However, they are restricted by international space laws. Impact angle of the projectile is a bottleneck for kinetic orbital bombardment. Larger impact angles can be achieved, but at the expense of a larger mass-to-orbit. A hypersonic drag device may be used to optimise the impact angle and thus improve the system. Alternative projectile delivery methods (Bomber, Intercontinental Ballistic Missile (ICBM)) show better performance for both steel and concrete targets. Essentially, only penetration phenomena matter because the seismic effects are not significant. Therefore, orbital bombardment systems don’t even resemble weapons of mass destruction (WMD). Given their limited effect, destroying a particular target requires a guidance and flight control system, which, given the high velocities, may not be feasible.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信