马克思主义新国际政治与德里达哲学的交汇:对西方宏观经济影响的元分析探究

Essien Oku Essien
{"title":"马克思主义新国际政治与德里达哲学的交汇:对西方宏观经济影响的元分析探究","authors":"Essien Oku Essien","doi":"10.54536/ajebi.v3i1.2366","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The current economic structure in the West is presented in this study as the product of a meeting of Marxist and Derridean ideas. In the light of this intersection and their variance, this study aims to contrast the economic views of Marx and Derrida with those of mainstream capitalism, to assess Derrida’s philosophical grounds for doubting the stability of Western economic structures, to understand the implications of adopting the Marxist perspective in the Western economic system, to examine how Marxist New International Politics and Derrida’s philosophy intersect, and what it means for international trade relations and global economic control. The study’s discourse was informed by the principles of Neoclassical economics to accomplish these objectives. The research used a systematic review process, with the PRISMA criteria utilized to guide the selection and screening of articles, hence, N = 482, n = 32. While 34% of the screened publications were found in Google Scholar (GS), the years 2015, 2019, and 2022 accounted for 57% of the cited papers. The research also used thematic analysis, delving deeply into four themes: Marx’s criticism of capitalism, Derrida’s deconstruction of capitalism, power and hegemonic dynamics, globalization and neoliberalism. The study findings show that Marx’s ideal economic system is one in which production choices are made by centralized authorities rather than the exploitative capitalist market. While Derrida agrees with the Marxist negative perspectives of capitalism, thus establishing an intersection, he argues that the transition from a capitalist system to an alternative society may cause considerable economic problems, thus advocating for improvements and not a switch. The study contends that the synthesis of the capitalist system’s positive and negative qualities has had a significant impact on the argument between Marxist and Derridean scholars and this link has established a framework for more research in economics.","PeriodicalId":505508,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Economics and Business Innovation","volume":"34 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Intersection in Marxist New International Politics and Derrida’s Philosophy: A Meta-Analytics Inquiry of Its Impacts on Western Macro-Economy\",\"authors\":\"Essien Oku Essien\",\"doi\":\"10.54536/ajebi.v3i1.2366\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The current economic structure in the West is presented in this study as the product of a meeting of Marxist and Derridean ideas. In the light of this intersection and their variance, this study aims to contrast the economic views of Marx and Derrida with those of mainstream capitalism, to assess Derrida’s philosophical grounds for doubting the stability of Western economic structures, to understand the implications of adopting the Marxist perspective in the Western economic system, to examine how Marxist New International Politics and Derrida’s philosophy intersect, and what it means for international trade relations and global economic control. The study’s discourse was informed by the principles of Neoclassical economics to accomplish these objectives. The research used a systematic review process, with the PRISMA criteria utilized to guide the selection and screening of articles, hence, N = 482, n = 32. While 34% of the screened publications were found in Google Scholar (GS), the years 2015, 2019, and 2022 accounted for 57% of the cited papers. The research also used thematic analysis, delving deeply into four themes: Marx’s criticism of capitalism, Derrida’s deconstruction of capitalism, power and hegemonic dynamics, globalization and neoliberalism. The study findings show that Marx’s ideal economic system is one in which production choices are made by centralized authorities rather than the exploitative capitalist market. While Derrida agrees with the Marxist negative perspectives of capitalism, thus establishing an intersection, he argues that the transition from a capitalist system to an alternative society may cause considerable economic problems, thus advocating for improvements and not a switch. The study contends that the synthesis of the capitalist system’s positive and negative qualities has had a significant impact on the argument between Marxist and Derridean scholars and this link has established a framework for more research in economics.\",\"PeriodicalId\":505508,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"American Journal of Economics and Business Innovation\",\"volume\":\"34 4\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-02-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"American Journal of Economics and Business Innovation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.54536/ajebi.v3i1.2366\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Economics and Business Innovation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.54536/ajebi.v3i1.2366","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究将西方当前的经济结构视为马克思主义与德里达思想交汇的产物。根据这种交汇及其差异,本研究旨在将马克思和德里达的经济观点与主流资本主义的经济观点进行对比,评估德里达怀疑西方经济结构稳定性的哲学依据,理解西方经济体系采用马克思主义观点的影响,考察马克思主义新国际政治学与德里达哲学的交汇,以及这对国际贸易关系和全球经济控制的意义。为实现上述目标,本研究的论述借鉴了新古典经济学的原则。本研究采用了系统性综述流程,利用 PRISMA 标准指导文章的选择和筛选,因此,N = 482,n = 32。在谷歌学术(GS)中找到的论文占筛选论文的 34%,而 2015 年、2019 年和 2022 年的论文占引用论文的 57%。研究还采用了主题分析法,深入探讨了四个主题:马克思对资本主义的批判、德里达对资本主义的解构、权力与霸权动力、全球化与新自由主义。研究结果表明,马克思的理想经济体制是由中央集权机构而非剥削性的资本主义市场做出生产选择。虽然德里达同意马克思主义对资本主义的负面观点,从而建立了一种交集,但他认为从资本主义制度过渡到另一种社会可能会带来相当大的经济问题,因此主张改进而不是转换。本研究认为,资本主义制度正反两方面特质的综合对马克思主义学者和德里达学者之间的争论产生了重大影响,这种联系为更多的经济学研究建立了框架。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The Intersection in Marxist New International Politics and Derrida’s Philosophy: A Meta-Analytics Inquiry of Its Impacts on Western Macro-Economy
The current economic structure in the West is presented in this study as the product of a meeting of Marxist and Derridean ideas. In the light of this intersection and their variance, this study aims to contrast the economic views of Marx and Derrida with those of mainstream capitalism, to assess Derrida’s philosophical grounds for doubting the stability of Western economic structures, to understand the implications of adopting the Marxist perspective in the Western economic system, to examine how Marxist New International Politics and Derrida’s philosophy intersect, and what it means for international trade relations and global economic control. The study’s discourse was informed by the principles of Neoclassical economics to accomplish these objectives. The research used a systematic review process, with the PRISMA criteria utilized to guide the selection and screening of articles, hence, N = 482, n = 32. While 34% of the screened publications were found in Google Scholar (GS), the years 2015, 2019, and 2022 accounted for 57% of the cited papers. The research also used thematic analysis, delving deeply into four themes: Marx’s criticism of capitalism, Derrida’s deconstruction of capitalism, power and hegemonic dynamics, globalization and neoliberalism. The study findings show that Marx’s ideal economic system is one in which production choices are made by centralized authorities rather than the exploitative capitalist market. While Derrida agrees with the Marxist negative perspectives of capitalism, thus establishing an intersection, he argues that the transition from a capitalist system to an alternative society may cause considerable economic problems, thus advocating for improvements and not a switch. The study contends that the synthesis of the capitalist system’s positive and negative qualities has had a significant impact on the argument between Marxist and Derridean scholars and this link has established a framework for more research in economics.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信