环状回肠造口术的并发症模式

Tangera Akter, Afm Anwar Hossain, S. Yeasmin
{"title":"环状回肠造口术的并发症模式","authors":"Tangera Akter, Afm Anwar Hossain, S. Yeasmin","doi":"10.3329/dmcj.v9i1.71333","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Loop ileostomy is a temporary diversion of small intestinal contents towards exterior through anterior abdominal wall. Though it is a good procedure for a better outcome of primary surgery it has itself many complications. Objective: To determine the clinical spectrum of loop ileostomy complications. Materials and method: This prospective study was conducted from January, 2017 to December, 2017. Consecutive 30 patients requiring loop ileostomy were enrolled in the study by purposive sampling and were categorized into Group A requiring emergency surgery and Group B planned for elective surgery. Data regarding sociodemographic, clinical, surgical and outcome profile were recorded in a pre-structured, interview and observation based, peer reviewed data collection sheet. Data were compiled, edited and analyzed with SPSS version 23. Data were presented as mean and standard deviation, frequency percentage and median with range. Results: The mean age of the patients were 32.79±5.19 years (age range: 20-43 years) and 49.16±6.17 years (age range: 28-76 years) in Group A and Group B respectively with sex ratio of male to female of 4:1 and 3:1. Out of 10 patients in Group A, 4(40%) patients underwent resection anastomosis with ileostomy and primary repair with loop ileostomy whereas 2(20%) patients underwent exteriorization of multiple perforation site. In Group B among 20 patients, 9(45%) underwent low anterior resection with loop ileostomy and 5(25%) patients underwent left hemicolectomy with loop ileostomy. Out of 10 patients in Group A, 5(50%) patients each suffered from skin excoriation and major wound infection. On the contrary, among 20 patients in Group B, 11(55%) and 4(20%) patients suffered from skin excoriation and stomal obstruction. Only skin excoriation was evident as statistically significantly higher in Group B than in Group A (p 0.03). Among the general complications, electrolyte imbalance (60% vs 40% in Group A and B respectively) and respiratory tract infection (10% each in Group A and B) were evident. Conclusion: Skin discoloration, skin edema, major and minor wound infection, prolapse, skin excoriation and stomal obstruction are the different spectrum of loop ileostomy complications in our perspective. Among them skin excoriation is much higher in routine cases than emergency surgery.\nDelta Med Col J. Jan 2021;9(1):17-22","PeriodicalId":53280,"journal":{"name":"Delta Medical College Journal","volume":"79 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Complication Patterns of Loop Ileostomy\",\"authors\":\"Tangera Akter, Afm Anwar Hossain, S. Yeasmin\",\"doi\":\"10.3329/dmcj.v9i1.71333\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background: Loop ileostomy is a temporary diversion of small intestinal contents towards exterior through anterior abdominal wall. Though it is a good procedure for a better outcome of primary surgery it has itself many complications. Objective: To determine the clinical spectrum of loop ileostomy complications. Materials and method: This prospective study was conducted from January, 2017 to December, 2017. Consecutive 30 patients requiring loop ileostomy were enrolled in the study by purposive sampling and were categorized into Group A requiring emergency surgery and Group B planned for elective surgery. Data regarding sociodemographic, clinical, surgical and outcome profile were recorded in a pre-structured, interview and observation based, peer reviewed data collection sheet. Data were compiled, edited and analyzed with SPSS version 23. Data were presented as mean and standard deviation, frequency percentage and median with range. Results: The mean age of the patients were 32.79±5.19 years (age range: 20-43 years) and 49.16±6.17 years (age range: 28-76 years) in Group A and Group B respectively with sex ratio of male to female of 4:1 and 3:1. Out of 10 patients in Group A, 4(40%) patients underwent resection anastomosis with ileostomy and primary repair with loop ileostomy whereas 2(20%) patients underwent exteriorization of multiple perforation site. In Group B among 20 patients, 9(45%) underwent low anterior resection with loop ileostomy and 5(25%) patients underwent left hemicolectomy with loop ileostomy. Out of 10 patients in Group A, 5(50%) patients each suffered from skin excoriation and major wound infection. On the contrary, among 20 patients in Group B, 11(55%) and 4(20%) patients suffered from skin excoriation and stomal obstruction. Only skin excoriation was evident as statistically significantly higher in Group B than in Group A (p 0.03). Among the general complications, electrolyte imbalance (60% vs 40% in Group A and B respectively) and respiratory tract infection (10% each in Group A and B) were evident. Conclusion: Skin discoloration, skin edema, major and minor wound infection, prolapse, skin excoriation and stomal obstruction are the different spectrum of loop ileostomy complications in our perspective. Among them skin excoriation is much higher in routine cases than emergency surgery.\\nDelta Med Col J. Jan 2021;9(1):17-22\",\"PeriodicalId\":53280,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Delta Medical College Journal\",\"volume\":\"79 4\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-02-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Delta Medical College Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3329/dmcj.v9i1.71333\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Delta Medical College Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3329/dmcj.v9i1.71333","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:环状回肠造口术是一种通过前腹壁将小肠内容物暂时转移到外部的手术。虽然这种手术能使初诊手术取得更好的效果,但其本身也有很多并发症。目的确定襻式回肠造口术并发症的临床范围。材料和方法:这项前瞻性研究于 2017 年 1 月至 2017 年 12 月进行。通过目的性抽样,将连续 30 名需要进行襻式回肠造口术的患者纳入研究,并将其分为需要紧急手术的 A 组和计划进行择期手术的 B 组。有关社会人口学、临床、手术和结果概况的数据均记录在预先设计的、基于访谈和观察的、经同行评审的数据收集表中。数据使用 SPSS 23 版本进行编辑和分析。数据以平均值和标准差、频率百分比和中位数及范围表示。结果A 组和 B 组患者的平均年龄分别为(32.79±5.19)岁(年龄范围:20-43 岁)和(49.16±6.17)岁(年龄范围:28-76 岁),男女性别比分别为 4:1 和 3:1。在 A 组的 10 名患者中,有 4 名(40%)患者接受了带回肠造口术的切除吻合术和带环状回肠造口术的初次修复术,而有 2 名(20%)患者接受了多处穿孔部位的外部处理。在 B 组的 20 名患者中,9 名(45%)患者接受了低位前切除术和回肠造口术,5 名(25%)患者接受了左半结肠切除术和回肠造口术。在 A 组的 10 名患者中,各有 5 名(50%)患者出现皮肤切除和主要伤口感染。相反,在 B 组的 20 名患者中,分别有 11 名(55%)和 4 名(20%)患者出现皮肤切除和口腔阻塞。在统计上,B 组只有皮肤切除明显高于 A 组(P 0.03)。在一般并发症中,电解质失衡(A 组和 B 组分别为 60% 和 40%)和呼吸道感染(A 组和 B 组分别为 10%)明显。结论在我们看来,皮肤变色、皮肤水肿、大小伤口感染、脱垂、皮肤切除和口腔阻塞是环状回肠造口术并发症的不同类型。其中,常规手术的皮肤切除率远高于急诊手术。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Complication Patterns of Loop Ileostomy
Background: Loop ileostomy is a temporary diversion of small intestinal contents towards exterior through anterior abdominal wall. Though it is a good procedure for a better outcome of primary surgery it has itself many complications. Objective: To determine the clinical spectrum of loop ileostomy complications. Materials and method: This prospective study was conducted from January, 2017 to December, 2017. Consecutive 30 patients requiring loop ileostomy were enrolled in the study by purposive sampling and were categorized into Group A requiring emergency surgery and Group B planned for elective surgery. Data regarding sociodemographic, clinical, surgical and outcome profile were recorded in a pre-structured, interview and observation based, peer reviewed data collection sheet. Data were compiled, edited and analyzed with SPSS version 23. Data were presented as mean and standard deviation, frequency percentage and median with range. Results: The mean age of the patients were 32.79±5.19 years (age range: 20-43 years) and 49.16±6.17 years (age range: 28-76 years) in Group A and Group B respectively with sex ratio of male to female of 4:1 and 3:1. Out of 10 patients in Group A, 4(40%) patients underwent resection anastomosis with ileostomy and primary repair with loop ileostomy whereas 2(20%) patients underwent exteriorization of multiple perforation site. In Group B among 20 patients, 9(45%) underwent low anterior resection with loop ileostomy and 5(25%) patients underwent left hemicolectomy with loop ileostomy. Out of 10 patients in Group A, 5(50%) patients each suffered from skin excoriation and major wound infection. On the contrary, among 20 patients in Group B, 11(55%) and 4(20%) patients suffered from skin excoriation and stomal obstruction. Only skin excoriation was evident as statistically significantly higher in Group B than in Group A (p 0.03). Among the general complications, electrolyte imbalance (60% vs 40% in Group A and B respectively) and respiratory tract infection (10% each in Group A and B) were evident. Conclusion: Skin discoloration, skin edema, major and minor wound infection, prolapse, skin excoriation and stomal obstruction are the different spectrum of loop ileostomy complications in our perspective. Among them skin excoriation is much higher in routine cases than emergency surgery. Delta Med Col J. Jan 2021;9(1):17-22
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
10
审稿时长
20 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信