网络形成过程中的局部远视

IF 0.5 4区 经济学 Q4 ECONOMICS
Pierre de Callataÿ, Ana Mauleon, Vincent Vannetelbosch
{"title":"网络形成过程中的局部远视","authors":"Pierre de Callataÿ,&nbsp;Ana Mauleon,&nbsp;Vincent Vannetelbosch","doi":"10.1111/ijet.12396","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>We propose the concept of local-<span></span><math>\n <semantics>\n <mrow>\n \n <mrow>\n <mi>k</mi>\n </mrow>\n </mrow>\n <annotation> $k$</annotation>\n </semantics></math> farsighted consistent network for analyzing network formation games where players only consider a limited number of feasible networks. A network <span></span><math>\n <semantics>\n <mrow>\n \n <mrow>\n <mi>g</mi>\n </mrow>\n </mrow>\n <annotation> $g$</annotation>\n </semantics></math> is said to be local-<span></span><math>\n <semantics>\n <mrow>\n \n <mrow>\n <mi>k</mi>\n </mrow>\n </mrow>\n <annotation> $k$</annotation>\n </semantics></math> farsightedly consistent if, for any network <span></span><math>\n <semantics>\n <mrow>\n \n <mrow>\n <mi>g</mi>\n \n <mo>′</mo>\n </mrow>\n </mrow>\n <annotation> $g^{\\prime} $</annotation>\n </semantics></math> within the distance-<span></span><math>\n <semantics>\n <mrow>\n \n <mrow>\n <mi>k</mi>\n </mrow>\n </mrow>\n <annotation> $k$</annotation>\n </semantics></math> neighborhood of <span></span><math>\n <semantics>\n <mrow>\n \n <mrow>\n <mi>g</mi>\n </mrow>\n </mrow>\n <annotation> $g$</annotation>\n </semantics></math>, either <span></span><math>\n <semantics>\n <mrow>\n \n <mrow>\n <mi>g</mi>\n </mrow>\n </mrow>\n <annotation> $g$</annotation>\n </semantics></math> is not defeated by <span></span><math>\n <semantics>\n <mrow>\n \n <mrow>\n <mi>g</mi>\n \n <mo>′</mo>\n </mrow>\n </mrow>\n <annotation> $g^{\\prime} $</annotation>\n </semantics></math>, or <span></span><math>\n <semantics>\n <mrow>\n \n <mrow>\n <mi>g</mi>\n </mrow>\n </mrow>\n <annotation> $g$</annotation>\n </semantics></math> defeats <span></span><math>\n <semantics>\n <mrow>\n \n <mrow>\n <mi>g</mi>\n \n <mo>′</mo>\n </mrow>\n </mrow>\n <annotation> $g^{\\prime} $</annotation>\n </semantics></math>. We show that if the utility function is (componentwise) egalitarian or satisfies reversibility or excludes externalities across components, then local-<span></span><math>\n <semantics>\n <mrow>\n \n <mrow>\n <mi>k</mi>\n </mrow>\n </mrow>\n <annotation> $k$</annotation>\n </semantics></math> farsightedness is more likely to be a good proxy for what would happen when players have full knowledge of all feasible networks.</p>","PeriodicalId":44551,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Economic Theory","volume":"20 2","pages":"199-226"},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Local farsightedness in network formation\",\"authors\":\"Pierre de Callataÿ,&nbsp;Ana Mauleon,&nbsp;Vincent Vannetelbosch\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/ijet.12396\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>We propose the concept of local-<span></span><math>\\n <semantics>\\n <mrow>\\n \\n <mrow>\\n <mi>k</mi>\\n </mrow>\\n </mrow>\\n <annotation> $k$</annotation>\\n </semantics></math> farsighted consistent network for analyzing network formation games where players only consider a limited number of feasible networks. A network <span></span><math>\\n <semantics>\\n <mrow>\\n \\n <mrow>\\n <mi>g</mi>\\n </mrow>\\n </mrow>\\n <annotation> $g$</annotation>\\n </semantics></math> is said to be local-<span></span><math>\\n <semantics>\\n <mrow>\\n \\n <mrow>\\n <mi>k</mi>\\n </mrow>\\n </mrow>\\n <annotation> $k$</annotation>\\n </semantics></math> farsightedly consistent if, for any network <span></span><math>\\n <semantics>\\n <mrow>\\n \\n <mrow>\\n <mi>g</mi>\\n \\n <mo>′</mo>\\n </mrow>\\n </mrow>\\n <annotation> $g^{\\\\prime} $</annotation>\\n </semantics></math> within the distance-<span></span><math>\\n <semantics>\\n <mrow>\\n \\n <mrow>\\n <mi>k</mi>\\n </mrow>\\n </mrow>\\n <annotation> $k$</annotation>\\n </semantics></math> neighborhood of <span></span><math>\\n <semantics>\\n <mrow>\\n \\n <mrow>\\n <mi>g</mi>\\n </mrow>\\n </mrow>\\n <annotation> $g$</annotation>\\n </semantics></math>, either <span></span><math>\\n <semantics>\\n <mrow>\\n \\n <mrow>\\n <mi>g</mi>\\n </mrow>\\n </mrow>\\n <annotation> $g$</annotation>\\n </semantics></math> is not defeated by <span></span><math>\\n <semantics>\\n <mrow>\\n \\n <mrow>\\n <mi>g</mi>\\n \\n <mo>′</mo>\\n </mrow>\\n </mrow>\\n <annotation> $g^{\\\\prime} $</annotation>\\n </semantics></math>, or <span></span><math>\\n <semantics>\\n <mrow>\\n \\n <mrow>\\n <mi>g</mi>\\n </mrow>\\n </mrow>\\n <annotation> $g$</annotation>\\n </semantics></math> defeats <span></span><math>\\n <semantics>\\n <mrow>\\n \\n <mrow>\\n <mi>g</mi>\\n \\n <mo>′</mo>\\n </mrow>\\n </mrow>\\n <annotation> $g^{\\\\prime} $</annotation>\\n </semantics></math>. We show that if the utility function is (componentwise) egalitarian or satisfies reversibility or excludes externalities across components, then local-<span></span><math>\\n <semantics>\\n <mrow>\\n \\n <mrow>\\n <mi>k</mi>\\n </mrow>\\n </mrow>\\n <annotation> $k$</annotation>\\n </semantics></math> farsightedness is more likely to be a good proxy for what would happen when players have full knowledge of all feasible networks.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":44551,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Economic Theory\",\"volume\":\"20 2\",\"pages\":\"199-226\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-02-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Economic Theory\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"96\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/ijet.12396\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"经济学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"ECONOMICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Economic Theory","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/ijet.12396","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

我们提出了 "局部-远视一致网络 "的概念,用于分析博弈者只考虑数量有限的可行网络的网络形成博弈。如果对于距离邻域内的任何网络来说,要么不被 ,要么被击败,那么这个网络就被称为本地远视一致网络。我们的研究表明,如果效用函数是(分量上的)平均主义的,或者满足可逆性,或者排除了跨分量的外部性,那么局部远视就更有可能很好地代表博弈者完全了解所有可行网络时会发生的情况。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Local farsightedness in network formation

We propose the concept of local- k $k$ farsighted consistent network for analyzing network formation games where players only consider a limited number of feasible networks. A network g $g$ is said to be local- k $k$ farsightedly consistent if, for any network g $g^{\prime} $ within the distance- k $k$ neighborhood of g $g$ , either g $g$ is not defeated by g $g^{\prime} $ , or g $g$ defeats g $g^{\prime} $ . We show that if the utility function is (componentwise) egalitarian or satisfies reversibility or excludes externalities across components, then local- k $k$ farsightedness is more likely to be a good proxy for what would happen when players have full knowledge of all feasible networks.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
34
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信