语音质量、语音内容和管理者情绪对语音评价的影响:一项实验调查

Robin Stumpf
{"title":"语音质量、语音内容和管理者情绪对语音评价的影响:一项实验调查","authors":"Robin Stumpf","doi":"10.1177/23970022241231540","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Whether organizations can benefit from employee voice depends on the receiving managers’ evaluations, as proposals can be implemented, dismissed, or forwarded to superiors for consideration. Despite its important role in identifying valuable suggestions, research on managers’ evaluations of employees’ proposals is scarce. Grounded in the literature on employee voice, innovation management, social hierarchy, the Elaboration Likelihood Model, and the Hedonic Contingency Model, the current study addresses this research gap by investigating the influence of voice quality, voice content, and managers’ mood on managers’ evaluations of voice. The findings from using a factorial, between-subjects experimental design with 384 German managers as participants demonstrate that managers’ evaluations tend to be higher when voice is of high quality and that managers evaluate promotive voice higher than they do prohibitive voice. No direct or indirect influence of managers’ mood was identified. The study concludes with implications for employees and organizations, limitations, and directions for future research.","PeriodicalId":206271,"journal":{"name":"German Journal of Human Resource Management: Zeitschrift für Personalforschung","volume":"179 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The influence of voice quality, voice content, and managers’ mood on their evaluations of voice: An experimental investigation\",\"authors\":\"Robin Stumpf\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/23970022241231540\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Whether organizations can benefit from employee voice depends on the receiving managers’ evaluations, as proposals can be implemented, dismissed, or forwarded to superiors for consideration. Despite its important role in identifying valuable suggestions, research on managers’ evaluations of employees’ proposals is scarce. Grounded in the literature on employee voice, innovation management, social hierarchy, the Elaboration Likelihood Model, and the Hedonic Contingency Model, the current study addresses this research gap by investigating the influence of voice quality, voice content, and managers’ mood on managers’ evaluations of voice. The findings from using a factorial, between-subjects experimental design with 384 German managers as participants demonstrate that managers’ evaluations tend to be higher when voice is of high quality and that managers evaluate promotive voice higher than they do prohibitive voice. No direct or indirect influence of managers’ mood was identified. The study concludes with implications for employees and organizations, limitations, and directions for future research.\",\"PeriodicalId\":206271,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"German Journal of Human Resource Management: Zeitschrift für Personalforschung\",\"volume\":\"179 3\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-02-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"German Journal of Human Resource Management: Zeitschrift für Personalforschung\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/23970022241231540\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"German Journal of Human Resource Management: Zeitschrift für Personalforschung","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/23970022241231540","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

组织能否从员工的声音中获益,取决于接受建议的管理者的评价,因为员工的建议可能会被执行、驳回或转交上级考虑。尽管管理者在发现有价值的建议方面发挥着重要作用,但有关管理者对员工建议的评价的研究却很少。本研究以员工声音、创新管理、社会等级制度、阐释可能性模型(Elaboration Likelihood Model)和享乐权变模型(Hedonic Contingency Model)等文献为基础,通过调查声音质量、声音内容和管理者情绪对管理者声音评价的影响,填补了这一研究空白。以 384 名德国经理为研究对象,采用因子、主体间实验设计得出的研究结果表明,当语音质量较高时,经理的评价往往较高,而且经理对促进性语音的评价高于对禁止性语音的评价。研究没有发现管理人员的情绪对其有直接或间接的影响。研究最后提出了对员工和组织的影响、局限性以及未来的研究方向。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The influence of voice quality, voice content, and managers’ mood on their evaluations of voice: An experimental investigation
Whether organizations can benefit from employee voice depends on the receiving managers’ evaluations, as proposals can be implemented, dismissed, or forwarded to superiors for consideration. Despite its important role in identifying valuable suggestions, research on managers’ evaluations of employees’ proposals is scarce. Grounded in the literature on employee voice, innovation management, social hierarchy, the Elaboration Likelihood Model, and the Hedonic Contingency Model, the current study addresses this research gap by investigating the influence of voice quality, voice content, and managers’ mood on managers’ evaluations of voice. The findings from using a factorial, between-subjects experimental design with 384 German managers as participants demonstrate that managers’ evaluations tend to be higher when voice is of high quality and that managers evaluate promotive voice higher than they do prohibitive voice. No direct or indirect influence of managers’ mood was identified. The study concludes with implications for employees and organizations, limitations, and directions for future research.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信