Jorg Tanis, M. Vroling, C. Martijn, J. Maas, G. Keijsers
{"title":"实施意图和监管契合度对主观暴饮暴食的影响","authors":"Jorg Tanis, M. Vroling, C. Martijn, J. Maas, G. Keijsers","doi":"10.1521/jscp.2024.43.1.28","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: Implementation intentions are if-then plans linking behavior with contextual features, thereby preventing goal shifts away from superordinate goals. Implementation intentions may be an addition to standard treatment for binge eating due to their limited use of cognitive resources. Implementation intention effects may be increased by matching implementation intentions to people's regulatory focus. Regulatory focus theory is a goal-pursuit theory emphasizing the relationship between peoples’ motivational orientations and the way they pursue goals. Methods: In a sample of students with subjective binge eating, reductions in binge eating were compared between two implementation intention conditions, one in accordance with participants’ regulatory focus and one opposite, and two control conditions with only goal setting. Results: Compared to control, both implementation intention conditions showed significant, long-lasting reductions in subjective binge eating. Regulatory focus showed no additional effects. Discussion: Three implementation intention sessions targeting subjective binge eating proved a promising intervention leading to long-term reductions in subjective binge eating. Future research should address its usefulness in clinical populations.","PeriodicalId":48202,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effects of implementation intentions and regulatory fit on subjective binge eating\",\"authors\":\"Jorg Tanis, M. Vroling, C. Martijn, J. Maas, G. Keijsers\",\"doi\":\"10.1521/jscp.2024.43.1.28\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Introduction: Implementation intentions are if-then plans linking behavior with contextual features, thereby preventing goal shifts away from superordinate goals. Implementation intentions may be an addition to standard treatment for binge eating due to their limited use of cognitive resources. Implementation intention effects may be increased by matching implementation intentions to people's regulatory focus. Regulatory focus theory is a goal-pursuit theory emphasizing the relationship between peoples’ motivational orientations and the way they pursue goals. Methods: In a sample of students with subjective binge eating, reductions in binge eating were compared between two implementation intention conditions, one in accordance with participants’ regulatory focus and one opposite, and two control conditions with only goal setting. Results: Compared to control, both implementation intention conditions showed significant, long-lasting reductions in subjective binge eating. Regulatory focus showed no additional effects. Discussion: Three implementation intention sessions targeting subjective binge eating proved a promising intervention leading to long-term reductions in subjective binge eating. Future research should address its usefulness in clinical populations.\",\"PeriodicalId\":48202,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-02-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1521/jscp.2024.43.1.28\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1521/jscp.2024.43.1.28","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
Effects of implementation intentions and regulatory fit on subjective binge eating
Introduction: Implementation intentions are if-then plans linking behavior with contextual features, thereby preventing goal shifts away from superordinate goals. Implementation intentions may be an addition to standard treatment for binge eating due to their limited use of cognitive resources. Implementation intention effects may be increased by matching implementation intentions to people's regulatory focus. Regulatory focus theory is a goal-pursuit theory emphasizing the relationship between peoples’ motivational orientations and the way they pursue goals. Methods: In a sample of students with subjective binge eating, reductions in binge eating were compared between two implementation intention conditions, one in accordance with participants’ regulatory focus and one opposite, and two control conditions with only goal setting. Results: Compared to control, both implementation intention conditions showed significant, long-lasting reductions in subjective binge eating. Regulatory focus showed no additional effects. Discussion: Three implementation intention sessions targeting subjective binge eating proved a promising intervention leading to long-term reductions in subjective binge eating. Future research should address its usefulness in clinical populations.
期刊介绍:
This journal is devoted to the application of theory and research from social psychology toward the better understanding of human adaptation and adjustment, including both the alleviation of psychological problems and distress (e.g., psychopathology) and the enhancement of psychological well-being among the psychologically healthy. Topics of interest include (but are not limited to) traditionally defined psychopathology (e.g., depression), common emotional and behavioral problems in living (e.g., conflicts in close relationships), the enhancement of subjective well-being, and the processes of psychological change in everyday life (e.g., self-regulation) and professional settings (e.g., psychotherapy and counseling). Articles reporting the results of theory-driven empirical research are given priority, but theoretical articles, review articles, clinical case studies, and essays on professional issues are also welcome. Articles describing the development of new scales (personality or otherwise) or the revision of existing scales are not appropriate for this journal.