N.M. Beckman , P.A. Lancaster , M.J. Engnell , H.K. Otott , A.K. Blomme , P.A. Badger , D.A. Lopez , Y. Zheng , R.G. Amachawadi , M.A. Schrader , C.R. Stark , C.B. Paulk
{"title":"肉鸡热处理和发酵食物垃圾的氮校正表观代谢能（AMEn）、氨基酸（AA）的表观回肠消化率（AID）和生长性能12","authors":"N.M. Beckman , P.A. Lancaster , M.J. Engnell , H.K. Otott , A.K. Blomme , P.A. Badger , D.A. Lopez , Y. Zheng , R.G. Amachawadi , M.A. Schrader , C.R. Stark , C.B. Paulk","doi":"10.1016/j.japr.2024.100418","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Three experiments were conducted to determine the nutrient availability of extruded and fermented food waste (<strong>FW</strong>) and subsequent effects on growth performance of broilers. Dining hall food waste was either mixed with soybean meal (<strong>SBM</strong>) and extruded (<strong>CFW</strong>) or was fermented for 14 d to create a value-added product (<strong>FFW</strong>). One-day old male broilers (Ross 708 Byproduct Broiler, Sallisaw, OK) were used in 3 separate 21-d studies to determine AMEn (Exp. 1, n = 300) and apparent ileal digestibility (AID, Exp. 2, n = 240) of CFW and FFW, and their effects on growth performance (Exp. 3, n = 420). Treatments for Exp. 1 and 2 consisted of 1) CFW, 2) conventional SBM (<strong>CSBM</strong>), 3) extruded SBM (<strong>ESBM</strong>), 4) SBM + FFW (<strong>SFFW</strong>). A basal treatment was added to Exp. 1 as a control. Treatments for Exp. 3 consisted of 1) corn/SBM basal, 2) 10% CFW, 3) 30% CFW, 4) 1.5% FFW, 5) 5.5% FFW, 6) basal + commercial astaxanthin, and 7) basal + commercial antibiotic. There were 10 cages per treatment with 6 broilers per cage and balanced by body weight. Data were analyzed using the GLIMMIX procedure of SAS vs. 9.4 (Cary, NC). The ESBM had a greater (<em>P</em> < 0.01) AMEn content than CSBM and SFFW whereas CFW was intermediate. Broilers fed CFW and CSBM had increased (<em>P</em> < 0.05) AID of indispensable amino acids compared to SFFW, except Met whereas ESBM was increased (<em>P</em> < 0.05) compared to SFFW with the exception of His, Met, and Try. Broilers fed 1.5% FFW had increased (<em>P</em> < 0.01) feed intake (<strong>FI</strong>) and BWG compared to those fed the control basal diet. Broilers fed the commercial astaxanthin or 30% CFW had poorer (<em>P</em> < 0.01) FCR compared to those fed the basal control. In conclusion, 2 different forms of food waste successfully served as a nutrient source for broilers. Composite food waste and SFFW had similar AMEn to CSBM while CFW had a similar AID of amino acids to CSBM. Including 30% of CFW reduced FCR of broilers; however, including 5.5% of SFFW increased FI and BWG.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":15240,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Applied Poultry Research","volume":"33 2","pages":"Article 100418"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1056617124000175/pdfft?md5=1001b68c15bb812d42e2feff5d633d2d&pid=1-s2.0-S1056617124000175-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Nitrogen corrected apparent metabolizable energy, apparent ileal digestibility of amino acids, and growth performance of thermally processed and fermented food waste for broilers\",\"authors\":\"N.M. Beckman , P.A. Lancaster , M.J. Engnell , H.K. Otott , A.K. Blomme , P.A. Badger , D.A. Lopez , Y. Zheng , R.G. Amachawadi , M.A. Schrader , C.R. Stark , C.B. Paulk\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.japr.2024.100418\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Three experiments were conducted to determine the nutrient availability of extruded and fermented food waste (<strong>FW</strong>) and subsequent effects on growth performance of broilers. Dining hall food waste was either mixed with soybean meal (<strong>SBM</strong>) and extruded (<strong>CFW</strong>) or was fermented for 14 d to create a value-added product (<strong>FFW</strong>). One-day old male broilers (Ross 708 Byproduct Broiler, Sallisaw, OK) were used in 3 separate 21-d studies to determine AMEn (Exp. 1, n = 300) and apparent ileal digestibility (AID, Exp. 2, n = 240) of CFW and FFW, and their effects on growth performance (Exp. 3, n = 420). Treatments for Exp. 1 and 2 consisted of 1) CFW, 2) conventional SBM (<strong>CSBM</strong>), 3) extruded SBM (<strong>ESBM</strong>), 4) SBM + FFW (<strong>SFFW</strong>). A basal treatment was added to Exp. 1 as a control. Treatments for Exp. 3 consisted of 1) corn/SBM basal, 2) 10% CFW, 3) 30% CFW, 4) 1.5% FFW, 5) 5.5% FFW, 6) basal + commercial astaxanthin, and 7) basal + commercial antibiotic. There were 10 cages per treatment with 6 broilers per cage and balanced by body weight. Data were analyzed using the GLIMMIX procedure of SAS vs. 9.4 (Cary, NC). The ESBM had a greater (<em>P</em> < 0.01) AMEn content than CSBM and SFFW whereas CFW was intermediate. Broilers fed CFW and CSBM had increased (<em>P</em> < 0.05) AID of indispensable amino acids compared to SFFW, except Met whereas ESBM was increased (<em>P</em> < 0.05) compared to SFFW with the exception of His, Met, and Try. Broilers fed 1.5% FFW had increased (<em>P</em> < 0.01) feed intake (<strong>FI</strong>) and BWG compared to those fed the control basal diet. Broilers fed the commercial astaxanthin or 30% CFW had poorer (<em>P</em> < 0.01) FCR compared to those fed the basal control. In conclusion, 2 different forms of food waste successfully served as a nutrient source for broilers. Composite food waste and SFFW had similar AMEn to CSBM while CFW had a similar AID of amino acids to CSBM. Including 30% of CFW reduced FCR of broilers; however, including 5.5% of SFFW increased FI and BWG.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15240,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Applied Poultry Research\",\"volume\":\"33 2\",\"pages\":\"Article 100418\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-02-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1056617124000175/pdfft?md5=1001b68c15bb812d42e2feff5d633d2d&pid=1-s2.0-S1056617124000175-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Applied Poultry Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1056617124000175\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"AGRICULTURE, DAIRY & ANIMAL SCIENCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Applied Poultry Research","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1056617124000175","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"AGRICULTURE, DAIRY & ANIMAL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
Nitrogen corrected apparent metabolizable energy, apparent ileal digestibility of amino acids, and growth performance of thermally processed and fermented food waste for broilers
Three experiments were conducted to determine the nutrient availability of extruded and fermented food waste (FW) and subsequent effects on growth performance of broilers. Dining hall food waste was either mixed with soybean meal (SBM) and extruded (CFW) or was fermented for 14 d to create a value-added product (FFW). One-day old male broilers (Ross 708 Byproduct Broiler, Sallisaw, OK) were used in 3 separate 21-d studies to determine AMEn (Exp. 1, n = 300) and apparent ileal digestibility (AID, Exp. 2, n = 240) of CFW and FFW, and their effects on growth performance (Exp. 3, n = 420). Treatments for Exp. 1 and 2 consisted of 1) CFW, 2) conventional SBM (CSBM), 3) extruded SBM (ESBM), 4) SBM + FFW (SFFW). A basal treatment was added to Exp. 1 as a control. Treatments for Exp. 3 consisted of 1) corn/SBM basal, 2) 10% CFW, 3) 30% CFW, 4) 1.5% FFW, 5) 5.5% FFW, 6) basal + commercial astaxanthin, and 7) basal + commercial antibiotic. There were 10 cages per treatment with 6 broilers per cage and balanced by body weight. Data were analyzed using the GLIMMIX procedure of SAS vs. 9.4 (Cary, NC). The ESBM had a greater (P < 0.01) AMEn content than CSBM and SFFW whereas CFW was intermediate. Broilers fed CFW and CSBM had increased (P < 0.05) AID of indispensable amino acids compared to SFFW, except Met whereas ESBM was increased (P < 0.05) compared to SFFW with the exception of His, Met, and Try. Broilers fed 1.5% FFW had increased (P < 0.01) feed intake (FI) and BWG compared to those fed the control basal diet. Broilers fed the commercial astaxanthin or 30% CFW had poorer (P < 0.01) FCR compared to those fed the basal control. In conclusion, 2 different forms of food waste successfully served as a nutrient source for broilers. Composite food waste and SFFW had similar AMEn to CSBM while CFW had a similar AID of amino acids to CSBM. Including 30% of CFW reduced FCR of broilers; however, including 5.5% of SFFW increased FI and BWG.
期刊介绍：
The Journal of Applied Poultry Research (JAPR) publishes original research reports, field reports, and reviews on breeding, hatching, health and disease, layer management, meat bird processing and products, meat bird management, microbiology, food safety, nutrition, environment, sanitation, welfare, and economics. As of January 2020, JAPR will become an Open Access journal with no subscription charges, meaning authors who publish here can make their research immediately, permanently, and freely accessible worldwide while retaining copyright to their work. Papers submitted for publication after October 1, 2019 will be published as Open Access papers.
The readers of JAPR are in education, extension, industry, and government, including research, teaching, administration, veterinary medicine, management, production, quality assurance, product development, and technical services. Nutritionists, breeder flock supervisors, production managers, microbiologists, laboratory personnel, food safety and sanitation managers, poultry processing managers, feed manufacturers, and egg producers use JAPR to keep up with current applied poultry research.
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
京公网安备 11010802042870号
