利用可变磁场磁铁对储层岩心塞进行快速自旋回波磁共振成像

IF 2 3区 化学 Q3 BIOCHEMICAL RESEARCH METHODS
Rheya Rajeev , Andrés Ramírez Aguilera , Florea Marica , Laura Romero-Zerón , Bruce J. Balcom
{"title":"利用可变磁场磁铁对储层岩心塞进行快速自旋回波磁共振成像","authors":"Rheya Rajeev ,&nbsp;Andrés Ramírez Aguilera ,&nbsp;Florea Marica ,&nbsp;Laura Romero-Zerón ,&nbsp;Bruce J. Balcom","doi":"10.1016/j.jmr.2024.107637","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Fast Spin Echo MRI is now widely employed in biomedicine for proton density and <em>T</em><sub>2</sub> contrast imaging. Fast Spin Echo methods provide rapid data acquisition by employing multiple echoes to determine multiple k-space lines with single excitations. Due to the multi-exponential behavior of <em>T</em><sub>2</sub> in typical porous media, and the strong dependence of <em>T</em><sub>2</sub> on the details of the experiment, acquiring a proton density image with Fast Spin Echo methods requires favorable sample and acquisition parameters. In recent years, we have shown the value of pure phase encode Free Induction Decay based methods such as SPRITE. However, in a reservoir rock, a typical <em>T</em><sub>2</sub>* is hundreds of µs, whereas a typical <em>T</em><sub>2</sub> is hundreds of ms. Hence, there is merit in considering spin echo-based MRI measurements such as the Fast Spin Echo for rock core plug studies.</p><p>A variable field superconducting magnet was employed in this study. This is a new class of magnet for MR/MRI. These magnets have the flexibility of operation in the field range of 0.01 Tesla to 3 Tesla. This is advantageous when working with rock core plugs, as it allows one to maximize sample magnetization, by increasing the static field while controlling magnetic susceptibility mismatch effects, and thereby <em>T</em><sub><em>2</em></sub> and <em>T</em><sub><em>2</em></sub><em>*</em>, through reducing the static field. The magnetic fields employed in the study were 0.79, 1.5, and 3 Tesla.</p><p>Measurements were undertaken on five brine-saturated reservoir rock core plugs (Bentheimer, Berea, Buff Berea, Nugget, and Wallace). The results show that Fast Spin Echo measurements are more sensitive than SPRITE methods in amenable samples and usually feature higher resolution. Quantification of saturation with Fast Spin Echo methods requires correction for <em>T</em><sub>2</sub> attenuation. The results also show that 3 Tesla is too high a static field in general for rock core MRI studies with either method. While the current study is focused on five representative reservoir rock cores, the conclusions which result are general for MRI of fluids in porous media.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":16267,"journal":{"name":"Journal of magnetic resonance","volume":"360 ","pages":"Article 107637"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Fast spin echo MRI of reservoir core plugs with a variable field magnet\",\"authors\":\"Rheya Rajeev ,&nbsp;Andrés Ramírez Aguilera ,&nbsp;Florea Marica ,&nbsp;Laura Romero-Zerón ,&nbsp;Bruce J. Balcom\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jmr.2024.107637\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Fast Spin Echo MRI is now widely employed in biomedicine for proton density and <em>T</em><sub>2</sub> contrast imaging. Fast Spin Echo methods provide rapid data acquisition by employing multiple echoes to determine multiple k-space lines with single excitations. Due to the multi-exponential behavior of <em>T</em><sub>2</sub> in typical porous media, and the strong dependence of <em>T</em><sub>2</sub> on the details of the experiment, acquiring a proton density image with Fast Spin Echo methods requires favorable sample and acquisition parameters. In recent years, we have shown the value of pure phase encode Free Induction Decay based methods such as SPRITE. However, in a reservoir rock, a typical <em>T</em><sub>2</sub>* is hundreds of µs, whereas a typical <em>T</em><sub>2</sub> is hundreds of ms. Hence, there is merit in considering spin echo-based MRI measurements such as the Fast Spin Echo for rock core plug studies.</p><p>A variable field superconducting magnet was employed in this study. This is a new class of magnet for MR/MRI. These magnets have the flexibility of operation in the field range of 0.01 Tesla to 3 Tesla. This is advantageous when working with rock core plugs, as it allows one to maximize sample magnetization, by increasing the static field while controlling magnetic susceptibility mismatch effects, and thereby <em>T</em><sub><em>2</em></sub> and <em>T</em><sub><em>2</em></sub><em>*</em>, through reducing the static field. The magnetic fields employed in the study were 0.79, 1.5, and 3 Tesla.</p><p>Measurements were undertaken on five brine-saturated reservoir rock core plugs (Bentheimer, Berea, Buff Berea, Nugget, and Wallace). The results show that Fast Spin Echo measurements are more sensitive than SPRITE methods in amenable samples and usually feature higher resolution. Quantification of saturation with Fast Spin Echo methods requires correction for <em>T</em><sub>2</sub> attenuation. The results also show that 3 Tesla is too high a static field in general for rock core MRI studies with either method. While the current study is focused on five representative reservoir rock cores, the conclusions which result are general for MRI of fluids in porous media.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16267,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of magnetic resonance\",\"volume\":\"360 \",\"pages\":\"Article 107637\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of magnetic resonance\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"92\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1090780724000211\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"化学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"BIOCHEMICAL RESEARCH METHODS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of magnetic resonance","FirstCategoryId":"92","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1090780724000211","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"化学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"BIOCHEMICAL RESEARCH METHODS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

快速自旋回波核磁共振成像目前已广泛应用于生物医学中的质子密度和 T2 对比成像。快速自旋回波方法通过采用多次回波来确定单次激发的多条 k 空间线,从而实现快速数据采集。由于 T2 在典型多孔介质中的多指数行为,以及 T2 对实验细节的强烈依赖性,使用快速自旋回波方法获取质子密度图像需要有利的样本和采集参数。近年来,我们已经展示了基于纯相编码自由感应衰减方法(如 SPRITE)的价值。然而,在储层岩石中,典型的 T2* 为数百微秒,而典型的 T2 为数百毫秒。因此,在岩心堵塞研究中考虑基于自旋回波的磁共振成像测量(如快速自旋回波)是有价值的。这是磁共振/MRI 的一种新型磁体。这些磁体可在 0.01 特斯拉到 3 特斯拉的磁场范围内灵活运行。这在处理岩芯塞子时非常有利,因为它可以通过增加静态磁场最大化样本磁化,同时通过减少静态磁场控制磁感应错配效应,从而控制 T2 和 T2*。研究中使用的磁场分别为 0.79、1.5 和 3 特斯拉。对五个盐水饱和的储层岩芯(Bentheimer、Berea、Buff Berea、Nugget 和 Wallace)进行了测量。结果表明,在适用样品中,快速自旋回波测量比 SPRITE 方法更灵敏,分辨率通常也更高。使用快速自旋回波方法量化饱和度需要对 T2 衰减进行校正。研究结果还表明,对于使用这两种方法进行岩芯磁共振成像研究来说,3 特斯拉的静态磁场一般都过高。虽然目前的研究主要针对五个具有代表性的储层岩心,但得出的结论对多孔介质中的流体磁共振成像具有普遍意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Fast spin echo MRI of reservoir core plugs with a variable field magnet

Fast spin echo MRI of reservoir core plugs with a variable field magnet

Fast Spin Echo MRI is now widely employed in biomedicine for proton density and T2 contrast imaging. Fast Spin Echo methods provide rapid data acquisition by employing multiple echoes to determine multiple k-space lines with single excitations. Due to the multi-exponential behavior of T2 in typical porous media, and the strong dependence of T2 on the details of the experiment, acquiring a proton density image with Fast Spin Echo methods requires favorable sample and acquisition parameters. In recent years, we have shown the value of pure phase encode Free Induction Decay based methods such as SPRITE. However, in a reservoir rock, a typical T2* is hundreds of µs, whereas a typical T2 is hundreds of ms. Hence, there is merit in considering spin echo-based MRI measurements such as the Fast Spin Echo for rock core plug studies.

A variable field superconducting magnet was employed in this study. This is a new class of magnet for MR/MRI. These magnets have the flexibility of operation in the field range of 0.01 Tesla to 3 Tesla. This is advantageous when working with rock core plugs, as it allows one to maximize sample magnetization, by increasing the static field while controlling magnetic susceptibility mismatch effects, and thereby T2 and T2*, through reducing the static field. The magnetic fields employed in the study were 0.79, 1.5, and 3 Tesla.

Measurements were undertaken on five brine-saturated reservoir rock core plugs (Bentheimer, Berea, Buff Berea, Nugget, and Wallace). The results show that Fast Spin Echo measurements are more sensitive than SPRITE methods in amenable samples and usually feature higher resolution. Quantification of saturation with Fast Spin Echo methods requires correction for T2 attenuation. The results also show that 3 Tesla is too high a static field in general for rock core MRI studies with either method. While the current study is focused on five representative reservoir rock cores, the conclusions which result are general for MRI of fluids in porous media.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
13.60%
发文量
150
审稿时长
69 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Magnetic Resonance presents original technical and scientific papers in all aspects of magnetic resonance, including nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy (NMR) of solids and liquids, electron spin/paramagnetic resonance (EPR), in vivo magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and spectroscopy (MRS), nuclear quadrupole resonance (NQR) and magnetic resonance phenomena at nearly zero fields or in combination with optics. The Journal''s main aims include deepening the physical principles underlying all these spectroscopies, publishing significant theoretical and experimental results leading to spectral and spatial progress in these areas, and opening new MR-based applications in chemistry, biology and medicine. The Journal also seeks descriptions of novel apparatuses, new experimental protocols, and new procedures of data analysis and interpretation - including computational and quantum-mechanical methods - capable of advancing MR spectroscopy and imaging.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信