静脉注射血红素--一种潜在的血红素加氧酶-1 激活剂--并不能保护人体免受胃食管反流术后急性胰腺炎的影响:随机多中心多国安慰剂对照试验的结果

IF 2.8 2区 医学 Q2 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY
Rawad A. Yared , Chieh-Chang Chen , Astrid Vandorpe , Marianna Arvanitakis , Myriam Delhaye , Michael Fernandez Y. Viesca , Vincent Huberty , Daniel Blero , Emmanuel Toussaint , Axel Hittelet , Didier Verset , Walter Margos , Olivier Le Moine , Hassane Njimi , Wei-Chih Liao , Jacques Devière , Arnaud Lemmers
{"title":"静脉注射血红素--一种潜在的血红素加氧酶-1 激活剂--并不能保护人体免受胃食管反流术后急性胰腺炎的影响:随机多中心多国安慰剂对照试验的结果","authors":"Rawad A. Yared ,&nbsp;Chieh-Chang Chen ,&nbsp;Astrid Vandorpe ,&nbsp;Marianna Arvanitakis ,&nbsp;Myriam Delhaye ,&nbsp;Michael Fernandez Y. Viesca ,&nbsp;Vincent Huberty ,&nbsp;Daniel Blero ,&nbsp;Emmanuel Toussaint ,&nbsp;Axel Hittelet ,&nbsp;Didier Verset ,&nbsp;Walter Margos ,&nbsp;Olivier Le Moine ,&nbsp;Hassane Njimi ,&nbsp;Wei-Chih Liao ,&nbsp;Jacques Devière ,&nbsp;Arnaud Lemmers","doi":"10.1016/j.pan.2024.02.009","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><p>Hemin, a heme oxygenase 1 activator has shown efficacy in the prevention and treatment of acute pancreatitis in mouse models. We conducted a randomized controlled trial (RCT) to assess the protective effect of Hemin administration to prevent post-endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) pancreatitis (PEP) in patients at risk.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>In this multicenter, multinational, placebo-controlled, double-blind RCT, we assigned patients at risk for PEP to receive a single intravenous dose of Hemin (4 mg/kg) or placebo immediately after ERCP. Patients were considered to be at risk on the basis of validated patient- and/or procedure-related risk factors. Neither rectal NSAIDs nor pancreatic stent insertion were allowed in randomized patients. The primary outcome was the incidence of PEP. Secondary outcomes included lipase elevation, mortality, safety, and length of stay.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>A total of 282 of the 294 randomized patients had complete follow-up. Groups were similar in terms of clinical, laboratory, and technical risk factors for PEP. PEP occurred in 16 of 142 patients (11.3%) in the Hemin group and in 20 of 140 patients (14.3%) in the placebo group (p = 0.48). Incidence of severe PEP reached 0.7% and 4.3% in the Hemin and placebo groups, respectively (p = 0.07). Significant lipase elevation after ERCP did not differ between groups. Length of hospital stay, mortality and severe adverse events rates were similar between groups.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>We failed to detect large improvements in PEP rate among participants at risk for PEP who received IV hemin immediately after the procedure compared to placebo.</p></div><div><h3>Trial registration number</h3><p><span>ClinicalTrials.gov</span><svg><path></path></svg> number, NCT01855841).</p></div>","PeriodicalId":19976,"journal":{"name":"Pancreatology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Intravenous Hemin, a potential heme oxygenase-1 activator, does not protect from post-ERCP acute pancreatitis in humans: Results of a randomized multicentric multinational placebo-controlled trial\",\"authors\":\"Rawad A. Yared ,&nbsp;Chieh-Chang Chen ,&nbsp;Astrid Vandorpe ,&nbsp;Marianna Arvanitakis ,&nbsp;Myriam Delhaye ,&nbsp;Michael Fernandez Y. Viesca ,&nbsp;Vincent Huberty ,&nbsp;Daniel Blero ,&nbsp;Emmanuel Toussaint ,&nbsp;Axel Hittelet ,&nbsp;Didier Verset ,&nbsp;Walter Margos ,&nbsp;Olivier Le Moine ,&nbsp;Hassane Njimi ,&nbsp;Wei-Chih Liao ,&nbsp;Jacques Devière ,&nbsp;Arnaud Lemmers\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.pan.2024.02.009\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Objective</h3><p>Hemin, a heme oxygenase 1 activator has shown efficacy in the prevention and treatment of acute pancreatitis in mouse models. We conducted a randomized controlled trial (RCT) to assess the protective effect of Hemin administration to prevent post-endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) pancreatitis (PEP) in patients at risk.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>In this multicenter, multinational, placebo-controlled, double-blind RCT, we assigned patients at risk for PEP to receive a single intravenous dose of Hemin (4 mg/kg) or placebo immediately after ERCP. Patients were considered to be at risk on the basis of validated patient- and/or procedure-related risk factors. Neither rectal NSAIDs nor pancreatic stent insertion were allowed in randomized patients. The primary outcome was the incidence of PEP. Secondary outcomes included lipase elevation, mortality, safety, and length of stay.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>A total of 282 of the 294 randomized patients had complete follow-up. Groups were similar in terms of clinical, laboratory, and technical risk factors for PEP. PEP occurred in 16 of 142 patients (11.3%) in the Hemin group and in 20 of 140 patients (14.3%) in the placebo group (p = 0.48). Incidence of severe PEP reached 0.7% and 4.3% in the Hemin and placebo groups, respectively (p = 0.07). Significant lipase elevation after ERCP did not differ between groups. Length of hospital stay, mortality and severe adverse events rates were similar between groups.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>We failed to detect large improvements in PEP rate among participants at risk for PEP who received IV hemin immediately after the procedure compared to placebo.</p></div><div><h3>Trial registration number</h3><p><span>ClinicalTrials.gov</span><svg><path></path></svg> number, NCT01855841).</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19976,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Pancreatology\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-02-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Pancreatology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S142439032400036X\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pancreatology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S142439032400036X","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的血红素是一种血红素加氧酶1激活剂,在小鼠模型中显示出预防和治疗急性胰腺炎的功效。方法在这项多中心、跨国、安慰剂对照、双盲的随机对照试验(RCT)中,我们让有胰腺炎风险的患者在接受内镜逆行胰胆管造影术(ERCP)后立即接受单次静脉注射剂量的海明(4 毫克/千克)或安慰剂。根据已验证的患者和/或手术相关风险因素,患者被视为高危人群。随机患者不得使用直肠非甾体抗炎药或插入胰腺支架。主要结果是PEP的发生率。次要结果包括脂肪酶升高、死亡率、安全性和住院时间。 结果 294名随机患者中,共有282人完成了随访。各组患者的临床、实验室和技术风险因素相似。赫敏组 142 例患者中有 16 例(11.3%)发生 PEP,安慰剂组 140 例患者中有 20 例(14.3%)发生 PEP(P = 0.48)。在 Hemin 组和安慰剂组中,严重 PEP 的发生率分别为 0.7% 和 4.3%(p = 0.07)。ERCP术后脂肪酶显著升高在各组之间没有差异。住院时间、死亡率和严重不良事件发生率在各组之间相似。结论与安慰剂相比,在术后立即接受静脉注射海明的有PEP风险的参与者中,我们未能发现PEP率的大幅提高。试验注册号ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT01855841)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Intravenous Hemin, a potential heme oxygenase-1 activator, does not protect from post-ERCP acute pancreatitis in humans: Results of a randomized multicentric multinational placebo-controlled trial

Objective

Hemin, a heme oxygenase 1 activator has shown efficacy in the prevention and treatment of acute pancreatitis in mouse models. We conducted a randomized controlled trial (RCT) to assess the protective effect of Hemin administration to prevent post-endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) pancreatitis (PEP) in patients at risk.

Methods

In this multicenter, multinational, placebo-controlled, double-blind RCT, we assigned patients at risk for PEP to receive a single intravenous dose of Hemin (4 mg/kg) or placebo immediately after ERCP. Patients were considered to be at risk on the basis of validated patient- and/or procedure-related risk factors. Neither rectal NSAIDs nor pancreatic stent insertion were allowed in randomized patients. The primary outcome was the incidence of PEP. Secondary outcomes included lipase elevation, mortality, safety, and length of stay.

Results

A total of 282 of the 294 randomized patients had complete follow-up. Groups were similar in terms of clinical, laboratory, and technical risk factors for PEP. PEP occurred in 16 of 142 patients (11.3%) in the Hemin group and in 20 of 140 patients (14.3%) in the placebo group (p = 0.48). Incidence of severe PEP reached 0.7% and 4.3% in the Hemin and placebo groups, respectively (p = 0.07). Significant lipase elevation after ERCP did not differ between groups. Length of hospital stay, mortality and severe adverse events rates were similar between groups.

Conclusion

We failed to detect large improvements in PEP rate among participants at risk for PEP who received IV hemin immediately after the procedure compared to placebo.

Trial registration number

ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT01855841).

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Pancreatology
Pancreatology 医学-胃肠肝病学
CiteScore
7.20
自引率
5.60%
发文量
194
审稿时长
44 days
期刊介绍: Pancreatology is the official journal of the International Association of Pancreatology (IAP), the European Pancreatic Club (EPC) and several national societies and study groups around the world. Dedicated to the understanding and treatment of exocrine as well as endocrine pancreatic disease, this multidisciplinary periodical publishes original basic, translational and clinical pancreatic research from a range of fields including gastroenterology, oncology, surgery, pharmacology, cellular and molecular biology as well as endocrinology, immunology and epidemiology. Readers can expect to gain new insights into pancreatic physiology and into the pathogenesis, diagnosis, therapeutic approaches and prognosis of pancreatic diseases. The journal features original articles, case reports, consensus guidelines and topical, cutting edge reviews, thus representing a source of valuable, novel information for clinical and basic researchers alike.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信