Jie Liu , Xiang-Zhen Shi , Li Yang , Chang-Yi Liu , Jin-Cheng Wang , Rui-Min Zhu , Xue-Li Shi , Qiu-Feng Liu
{"title":"基于综合评估框架的中国气候损害评估","authors":"Jie Liu , Xiang-Zhen Shi , Li Yang , Chang-Yi Liu , Jin-Cheng Wang , Rui-Min Zhu , Xue-Li Shi , Qiu-Feng Liu","doi":"10.1016/j.accre.2024.01.012","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Developing a localized and consistent model framework for climate loss and damage assessment is crucial for the policy-making of climate change mitigation and adaptation. This study introduces a comprehensive, multidisciplinary Integrated Assessment Model (IAM) framework for evaluating climate damage in China, utilizing BCC-SESM climate model and FUND sectoral climate damage model under the SSP2-RCPs scenario. Employing a bottom-up approach, the research estimates climate damage across eight major sectors, recalibrates sectoral climate damage functions and parameters for China, and elucidates distinctions among direct climate loss, market climate loss, and aggregate climate loss. The findings reveal that the total climate damage function for China follows a quadratic pattern in response to temperature rise. By 2050, the estimated climate damage is projected to be 5.4%, 5.7%, and 8.2% of GDP under RCP2.6, RCP4.5, and RCP8.5, respectively. Additionally, both direct and market climate losses are projected to remain below 2% of GDP by 2050, while the aggregate climate loss could reach as high as 8.2%, which is predominantly attributed to non-market sectors. From a sectoral perspective, under the RCP8.5 scenario, human health damage constitutes the largest share (61.9%) of the total climate loss by 2050, followed by sea-level rise damage (18.6%). This study sheds lights on the adaptation policy that should attach importance to the non-market sectors, particularly focusing on human health and sea-level rise.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":48628,"journal":{"name":"Advances in Climate Change Research","volume":"15 1","pages":"Pages 124-133"},"PeriodicalIF":6.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1674927824000248/pdfft?md5=d6063964e1e7457767e16c51c14025bb&pid=1-s2.0-S1674927824000248-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Assessment of climate damage in China based on integrated assessment framework\",\"authors\":\"Jie Liu , Xiang-Zhen Shi , Li Yang , Chang-Yi Liu , Jin-Cheng Wang , Rui-Min Zhu , Xue-Li Shi , Qiu-Feng Liu\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.accre.2024.01.012\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Developing a localized and consistent model framework for climate loss and damage assessment is crucial for the policy-making of climate change mitigation and adaptation. This study introduces a comprehensive, multidisciplinary Integrated Assessment Model (IAM) framework for evaluating climate damage in China, utilizing BCC-SESM climate model and FUND sectoral climate damage model under the SSP2-RCPs scenario. Employing a bottom-up approach, the research estimates climate damage across eight major sectors, recalibrates sectoral climate damage functions and parameters for China, and elucidates distinctions among direct climate loss, market climate loss, and aggregate climate loss. The findings reveal that the total climate damage function for China follows a quadratic pattern in response to temperature rise. By 2050, the estimated climate damage is projected to be 5.4%, 5.7%, and 8.2% of GDP under RCP2.6, RCP4.5, and RCP8.5, respectively. Additionally, both direct and market climate losses are projected to remain below 2% of GDP by 2050, while the aggregate climate loss could reach as high as 8.2%, which is predominantly attributed to non-market sectors. From a sectoral perspective, under the RCP8.5 scenario, human health damage constitutes the largest share (61.9%) of the total climate loss by 2050, followed by sea-level rise damage (18.6%). This study sheds lights on the adaptation policy that should attach importance to the non-market sectors, particularly focusing on human health and sea-level rise.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48628,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Advances in Climate Change Research\",\"volume\":\"15 1\",\"pages\":\"Pages 124-133\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-02-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1674927824000248/pdfft?md5=d6063964e1e7457767e16c51c14025bb&pid=1-s2.0-S1674927824000248-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Advances in Climate Change Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"89\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1674927824000248\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"地球科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Advances in Climate Change Research","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1674927824000248","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
为气候损失和损害评估开发一个本地化的、一致的模型框架对于减缓和适应气候变化的决策至关重要。本研究利用 BCC-SESM 气候模型和 FUND 行业气候损失模型,在 SSP2-RCPs 情景下引入了一个全面、多学科的综合评估模型(IAM)框架,用于评估中国的气候损失。研究采用自下而上的方法,估算了八个主要部门的气候损失,重新校准了中国部门气候损失函数和参数,并阐明了直接气候损失、市场气候损失和总体气候损失之间的区别。研究结果表明,中国的总体气候损失函数对气温上升的响应呈二次型。到 2050 年,在 RCP2.6、RCP4.5 和 RCP8.5 条件下,预计气候损失分别占 GDP 的 5.4%、5.7% 和 8.2%。此外,到 2050 年,直接气候损失和市场气候损失预计仍将低于 GDP 的 2%,而总体气候损失可能高达 8.2%,这主要归因于非市场部门。从部门角度看,在 RCP8.5 情景下,到 2050 年,人类健康损害占气候总损失的最大份额(61.9%),其次是海平面上升损害(18.6%)。本研究揭示了适应政策应重视非市场部门,特别是关注人类健康和海平面上升。
Assessment of climate damage in China based on integrated assessment framework
Developing a localized and consistent model framework for climate loss and damage assessment is crucial for the policy-making of climate change mitigation and adaptation. This study introduces a comprehensive, multidisciplinary Integrated Assessment Model (IAM) framework for evaluating climate damage in China, utilizing BCC-SESM climate model and FUND sectoral climate damage model under the SSP2-RCPs scenario. Employing a bottom-up approach, the research estimates climate damage across eight major sectors, recalibrates sectoral climate damage functions and parameters for China, and elucidates distinctions among direct climate loss, market climate loss, and aggregate climate loss. The findings reveal that the total climate damage function for China follows a quadratic pattern in response to temperature rise. By 2050, the estimated climate damage is projected to be 5.4%, 5.7%, and 8.2% of GDP under RCP2.6, RCP4.5, and RCP8.5, respectively. Additionally, both direct and market climate losses are projected to remain below 2% of GDP by 2050, while the aggregate climate loss could reach as high as 8.2%, which is predominantly attributed to non-market sectors. From a sectoral perspective, under the RCP8.5 scenario, human health damage constitutes the largest share (61.9%) of the total climate loss by 2050, followed by sea-level rise damage (18.6%). This study sheds lights on the adaptation policy that should attach importance to the non-market sectors, particularly focusing on human health and sea-level rise.
期刊介绍:
Advances in Climate Change Research publishes scientific research and analyses on climate change and the interactions of climate change with society. This journal encompasses basic science and economic, social, and policy research, including studies on mitigation and adaptation to climate change.
Advances in Climate Change Research attempts to promote research in climate change and provide an impetus for the application of research achievements in numerous aspects, such as socioeconomic sustainable development, responses to the adaptation and mitigation of climate change, diplomatic negotiations of climate and environment policies, and the protection and exploitation of natural resources.