基于熵的观察研究:通过改变芬太尼和异丙酚给药的时间间隔来评估麻醉诱导所需的异丙酚剂量

Chetan Shivaram, Suresh Bhat, Neeta Santha
{"title":"基于熵的观察研究:通过改变芬太尼和异丙酚给药的时间间隔来评估麻醉诱导所需的异丙酚剂量","authors":"Chetan Shivaram, Suresh Bhat, Neeta Santha","doi":"10.4103/jmedsci.jmedsci_47_23","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n \n \n Propofol is the preferred drug for the induction of anesthesia in many centers. However, its ubiquitous use is hampered by adverse effects. The rationale behind our study is to prove that whether the administration of an opioid drug before propofol induction, lowers the amount of propofol requirement for balanced anesthesia, and enhances hemodynamic stability.\n \n \n \n The present study intends to know the consequence of the differing time intervals between the administration of fentanyl and propofol on the dosage of propofol required to achieve induction of general anesthesia.\n \n \n \n In this observational study, 84 patients were included in the study. Patients who received propofol immediately after fentanyl injection were included in Group 1, whereas patients who received propofol at 3 min and 6 min after fentanyl injection, respectively, were grouped as Group 2 and Group 3. The total propofol required, the hemodynamic variations and the entropy values were recorded. SSPS version 25.09 (IBM) was used for statistical analysis.\n \n \n \n In this study, it was observed that there was a significant reduction in propofol requirement in Group 2 and Group 3 compared with Group 1. The incidence of hypotension was seen in about 42.9% of Group 1 when compared to Group 2 and 3, which was 28.6% and 17.8%, respectively. Furthermore, the entropy values in Group 3 were initially higher and later were comparable in all the groups.\n \n \n \n Our study concluded that as the duration between the administration of propofol and fentanyl increases, the hemodynamic stability also increases and there is no variation in the depth of anesthesia attained in the distinct study population.\n","PeriodicalId":16486,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Medical Sciences","volume":"40 10","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"An Entropy Based Observational Study to Assess the Dosage of Propofol required for Induction of Anaesthesia by Varying the Time Intervals between Fentanyl and Propofol Administration\",\"authors\":\"Chetan Shivaram, Suresh Bhat, Neeta Santha\",\"doi\":\"10.4103/jmedsci.jmedsci_47_23\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n \\n \\n Propofol is the preferred drug for the induction of anesthesia in many centers. However, its ubiquitous use is hampered by adverse effects. The rationale behind our study is to prove that whether the administration of an opioid drug before propofol induction, lowers the amount of propofol requirement for balanced anesthesia, and enhances hemodynamic stability.\\n \\n \\n \\n The present study intends to know the consequence of the differing time intervals between the administration of fentanyl and propofol on the dosage of propofol required to achieve induction of general anesthesia.\\n \\n \\n \\n In this observational study, 84 patients were included in the study. Patients who received propofol immediately after fentanyl injection were included in Group 1, whereas patients who received propofol at 3 min and 6 min after fentanyl injection, respectively, were grouped as Group 2 and Group 3. The total propofol required, the hemodynamic variations and the entropy values were recorded. SSPS version 25.09 (IBM) was used for statistical analysis.\\n \\n \\n \\n In this study, it was observed that there was a significant reduction in propofol requirement in Group 2 and Group 3 compared with Group 1. The incidence of hypotension was seen in about 42.9% of Group 1 when compared to Group 2 and 3, which was 28.6% and 17.8%, respectively. Furthermore, the entropy values in Group 3 were initially higher and later were comparable in all the groups.\\n \\n \\n \\n Our study concluded that as the duration between the administration of propofol and fentanyl increases, the hemodynamic stability also increases and there is no variation in the depth of anesthesia attained in the distinct study population.\\n\",\"PeriodicalId\":16486,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Medical Sciences\",\"volume\":\"40 10\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-02-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Medical Sciences\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4103/jmedsci.jmedsci_47_23\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Medical Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/jmedsci.jmedsci_47_23","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在许多中心,丙泊酚是麻醉诱导的首选药物。然而,丙泊酚的普遍使用却受到不良反应的阻碍。我们的研究旨在证明在异丙酚诱导前使用阿片类药物是否能降低平衡麻醉所需的异丙酚用量,并增强血液动力学的稳定性。 本研究旨在了解芬太尼和异丙酚给药时间间隔不同对实现全身麻醉诱导所需的异丙酚剂量的影响。 这项观察性研究共纳入了 84 名患者。在注射芬太尼后立即接受异丙酚的患者被归为第一组,而在注射芬太尼后 3 分钟和 6 分钟分别接受异丙酚的患者被归为第二组和第三组。 研究记录了所需的异丙酚总量、血液动力学变化和熵值。统计分析采用 SSPS 25.09 版(IBM)。 本研究观察到,与第一组相比,第二组和第三组的异丙酚需求量显著减少;与第二组和第三组分别为 28.6% 和 17.8% 的低血压发生率相比,第一组的低血压发生率约为 42.9%。此外,第 3 组的熵值最初较高,后来在所有组中不相上下。 我们的研究得出结论,随着异丙酚和芬太尼给药间隔时间的延长,血液动力学的稳定性也会增加,不同研究人群达到的麻醉深度没有差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
An Entropy Based Observational Study to Assess the Dosage of Propofol required for Induction of Anaesthesia by Varying the Time Intervals between Fentanyl and Propofol Administration
Propofol is the preferred drug for the induction of anesthesia in many centers. However, its ubiquitous use is hampered by adverse effects. The rationale behind our study is to prove that whether the administration of an opioid drug before propofol induction, lowers the amount of propofol requirement for balanced anesthesia, and enhances hemodynamic stability. The present study intends to know the consequence of the differing time intervals between the administration of fentanyl and propofol on the dosage of propofol required to achieve induction of general anesthesia. In this observational study, 84 patients were included in the study. Patients who received propofol immediately after fentanyl injection were included in Group 1, whereas patients who received propofol at 3 min and 6 min after fentanyl injection, respectively, were grouped as Group 2 and Group 3. The total propofol required, the hemodynamic variations and the entropy values were recorded. SSPS version 25.09 (IBM) was used for statistical analysis. In this study, it was observed that there was a significant reduction in propofol requirement in Group 2 and Group 3 compared with Group 1. The incidence of hypotension was seen in about 42.9% of Group 1 when compared to Group 2 and 3, which was 28.6% and 17.8%, respectively. Furthermore, the entropy values in Group 3 were initially higher and later were comparable in all the groups. Our study concluded that as the duration between the administration of propofol and fentanyl increases, the hemodynamic stability also increases and there is no variation in the depth of anesthesia attained in the distinct study population.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信