利用工作实例促进分数概念的解释:形成性试点研究

Amber Y. Wang, Robin F. Schumacher, Barbara J. Dougherty, Samantha Wavell, Joseph A. Dimino, Russell Gersten
{"title":"利用工作实例促进分数概念的解释:形成性试点研究","authors":"Amber Y. Wang, Robin F. Schumacher, Barbara J. Dougherty, Samantha Wavell, Joseph A. Dimino, Russell Gersten","doi":"10.1177/09388982241230131","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This pilot study examined the feasibility of using worked examples as a mechanism to improve verbal explanations of fractions concepts among Grade 5 students with mathematics difficulties in a small-scale randomized controlled trial (RCT) before scaling up to a large-scale RCT. Students ( N = 49) were randomly assigned to a business-as-usual (BAU) comparison group and to two variants of intervention. One intervention condition received both correct and incorrect worked example solutions, the other received correct solutions only. On a measure of verbal explanations, intervention students significantly outperformed students in BAU. Furthermore, students who received both correct and incorrect solutions significantly outperformed students who received correct solutions only on verbal explanations. On fractions proficiency outcomes, results were not significant between intervention and BAU or between the two intervention groups; however, positive findings demonstrate promise for using worked examples to elicit and develop students’ verbal explanations of fractions concepts.","PeriodicalId":142235,"journal":{"name":"Learning Disabilities Research & Practice","volume":"353 2‐3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Using worked examples to promote explanations of fractions concepts: A formative pilot study\",\"authors\":\"Amber Y. Wang, Robin F. Schumacher, Barbara J. Dougherty, Samantha Wavell, Joseph A. Dimino, Russell Gersten\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/09388982241230131\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This pilot study examined the feasibility of using worked examples as a mechanism to improve verbal explanations of fractions concepts among Grade 5 students with mathematics difficulties in a small-scale randomized controlled trial (RCT) before scaling up to a large-scale RCT. Students ( N = 49) were randomly assigned to a business-as-usual (BAU) comparison group and to two variants of intervention. One intervention condition received both correct and incorrect worked example solutions, the other received correct solutions only. On a measure of verbal explanations, intervention students significantly outperformed students in BAU. Furthermore, students who received both correct and incorrect solutions significantly outperformed students who received correct solutions only on verbal explanations. On fractions proficiency outcomes, results were not significant between intervention and BAU or between the two intervention groups; however, positive findings demonstrate promise for using worked examples to elicit and develop students’ verbal explanations of fractions concepts.\",\"PeriodicalId\":142235,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Learning Disabilities Research & Practice\",\"volume\":\"353 2‐3\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-02-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Learning Disabilities Research & Practice\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/09388982241230131\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Learning Disabilities Research & Practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/09388982241230131","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本试验性研究探讨了在扩大到大规模随机对照试验(RCT)之前,在小规模随机对照试验(RCT)中使用工作示例作为一种机制来改进对有数学困难的五年级学生的分数概念的口头解释的可行性。学生(49 人)被随机分配到一个 "一切照旧"(BAU)对比组和两个不同的干预组。一种干预条件是同时接受正确和错误的工作示例解决方案,另一种干预条件是只接受正确的解决方案。在口头解释方面,接受干预的学生明显优于接受 BAU 的学生。此外,在口头解释方面,同时获得正确和错误解法的学生明显优于只获得正确解法的学生。在分数能力结果方面,干预组与 BAU 组之间或两个干预组之间的结果并不显著;但是,积极的研究结果表明,使用工作实例来激发和发展学生对分数概念的口头解释是有前景的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Using worked examples to promote explanations of fractions concepts: A formative pilot study
This pilot study examined the feasibility of using worked examples as a mechanism to improve verbal explanations of fractions concepts among Grade 5 students with mathematics difficulties in a small-scale randomized controlled trial (RCT) before scaling up to a large-scale RCT. Students ( N = 49) were randomly assigned to a business-as-usual (BAU) comparison group and to two variants of intervention. One intervention condition received both correct and incorrect worked example solutions, the other received correct solutions only. On a measure of verbal explanations, intervention students significantly outperformed students in BAU. Furthermore, students who received both correct and incorrect solutions significantly outperformed students who received correct solutions only on verbal explanations. On fractions proficiency outcomes, results were not significant between intervention and BAU or between the two intervention groups; however, positive findings demonstrate promise for using worked examples to elicit and develop students’ verbal explanations of fractions concepts.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信