吃虫子会让你烦吗?人类食虫的情绪

IF 3.4 3区 经济学 Q1 AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS & POLICY
Andreia C.B. Ferreira, R. Rodrigues, Ana R. Gouveia, Oliva M. D. Martins, Hugo Ferreira, J. Pereira, Paulo Duarte
{"title":"吃虫子会让你烦吗?人类食虫的情绪","authors":"Andreia C.B. Ferreira, R. Rodrigues, Ana R. Gouveia, Oliva M. D. Martins, Hugo Ferreira, J. Pereira, Paulo Duarte","doi":"10.1108/bfj-12-2022-1075","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"PurposeThe use of insects as food is a proposed solution for the increased demand for food worldwide, but it lacks acceptance because of restrictive emotional factors. This article aims to understand better customers' emotions’ role in considering and consuming insect-based food.Design/methodology/approachTo assess their acceptance, an experiment was developed with 38 participants living in Portugal to identify how people feel when consuming processed insect bars compared to cereal bars (of equal flavour). A video was recorded “before”, “during” and “after” the consumption of such foods, and the triggered emotions and affective states were identified using the Facial Action Coding System (FACS) and the circumplex model of affect, respectively. After consumption, the Self-Assessment Manikin (SAM) was asked to be completed.FindingsIt was observed that the valence and arousal of the emotions and affective states triggered during consumption were higher in the insect bar than in the cereal bar. Its consumption resulted in surprise and a positive evaluation. Processed insect-based foods may result in a potentially increased acceptance of this new food alternative in the market.Originality/valuePrior studies briefly identified disgust as a primary emotion activated by insect-based food. The current research deeply studied emotional responses to insect-based processed foods in the Western world using the dimensional emotional models. This study offers arguments for the insect-based food industry to invest in processed food justified by its potential for acceptance. In addition, it motivates further research focused on other insect-based products (e.g. non-processed ones).","PeriodicalId":9231,"journal":{"name":"British Food Journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Does it bug you eating bugs? The emotions of anthropoentomophagy\",\"authors\":\"Andreia C.B. Ferreira, R. Rodrigues, Ana R. Gouveia, Oliva M. D. Martins, Hugo Ferreira, J. Pereira, Paulo Duarte\",\"doi\":\"10.1108/bfj-12-2022-1075\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"PurposeThe use of insects as food is a proposed solution for the increased demand for food worldwide, but it lacks acceptance because of restrictive emotional factors. This article aims to understand better customers' emotions’ role in considering and consuming insect-based food.Design/methodology/approachTo assess their acceptance, an experiment was developed with 38 participants living in Portugal to identify how people feel when consuming processed insect bars compared to cereal bars (of equal flavour). A video was recorded “before”, “during” and “after” the consumption of such foods, and the triggered emotions and affective states were identified using the Facial Action Coding System (FACS) and the circumplex model of affect, respectively. After consumption, the Self-Assessment Manikin (SAM) was asked to be completed.FindingsIt was observed that the valence and arousal of the emotions and affective states triggered during consumption were higher in the insect bar than in the cereal bar. Its consumption resulted in surprise and a positive evaluation. Processed insect-based foods may result in a potentially increased acceptance of this new food alternative in the market.Originality/valuePrior studies briefly identified disgust as a primary emotion activated by insect-based food. The current research deeply studied emotional responses to insect-based processed foods in the Western world using the dimensional emotional models. This study offers arguments for the insect-based food industry to invest in processed food justified by its potential for acceptance. In addition, it motivates further research focused on other insect-based products (e.g. non-processed ones).\",\"PeriodicalId\":9231,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"British Food Journal\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-02-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"British Food Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1108/bfj-12-2022-1075\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"经济学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS & POLICY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"British Food Journal","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/bfj-12-2022-1075","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS & POLICY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的使用昆虫作为食品是应对全球食品需求增长的一个建议方案,但由于情感因素的限制,这种方案缺乏认可度。为了评估昆虫食品的接受程度,我们与居住在葡萄牙的 38 名参与者进行了一项实验,以确定人们在食用昆虫加工食品和谷物食品(口味相同)时的感受。实验录制了食用此类食品 "前"、"中 "和 "后 "的视频,并分别使用面部动作编码系统(FACS)和情感的环状模型确定了引发的情绪和情感状态。研究结果表明,昆虫棒在食用过程中引发的情绪和情感状态的价值和唤醒程度高于谷物棒。食用昆虫棒会带来惊喜和积极的评价。昆虫加工食品可能会提高市场对这种新食品替代品的接受度。目前的研究利用维度情感模型深入研究了西方国家对昆虫加工食品的情感反应。这项研究为昆虫食品行业投资加工食品提供了论据,因为加工食品具有被接受的潜力。此外,它还推动了对其他昆虫食品(如非加工食品)的进一步研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Does it bug you eating bugs? The emotions of anthropoentomophagy
PurposeThe use of insects as food is a proposed solution for the increased demand for food worldwide, but it lacks acceptance because of restrictive emotional factors. This article aims to understand better customers' emotions’ role in considering and consuming insect-based food.Design/methodology/approachTo assess their acceptance, an experiment was developed with 38 participants living in Portugal to identify how people feel when consuming processed insect bars compared to cereal bars (of equal flavour). A video was recorded “before”, “during” and “after” the consumption of such foods, and the triggered emotions and affective states were identified using the Facial Action Coding System (FACS) and the circumplex model of affect, respectively. After consumption, the Self-Assessment Manikin (SAM) was asked to be completed.FindingsIt was observed that the valence and arousal of the emotions and affective states triggered during consumption were higher in the insect bar than in the cereal bar. Its consumption resulted in surprise and a positive evaluation. Processed insect-based foods may result in a potentially increased acceptance of this new food alternative in the market.Originality/valuePrior studies briefly identified disgust as a primary emotion activated by insect-based food. The current research deeply studied emotional responses to insect-based processed foods in the Western world using the dimensional emotional models. This study offers arguments for the insect-based food industry to invest in processed food justified by its potential for acceptance. In addition, it motivates further research focused on other insect-based products (e.g. non-processed ones).
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
British Food Journal
British Food Journal 工程技术-食品科技
CiteScore
6.90
自引率
15.20%
发文量
219
审稿时长
18-36 weeks
期刊介绍: After 115 years, the British Food Journal (BFJ) continues to be highly respected worldwide for its broad and unique interdisciplinary coverage of the latest food-related double blind peer-reviewed research. It links all sectors of this dynamic industry, keeping abreast of emerging trends, topical and controversial issues and informing and stimulating debate. - See more at: http://emeraldgrouppublishing.com/products/journals/journals.htm?id=bfj#sthash.O3wH4pEh.dpuf
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信