铁基和铝基混凝剂在去除有机物和消毒副产物前体方面的比较

IF 1.5 4区 环境科学与生态学 Q4 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
Euis Nurul Hidayah, Okik Hendriyanto Cahyonugroho, Rizka Novembrianto, Kindriari Nurma Wahyusi, Endang Srihari
{"title":"铁基和铝基混凝剂在去除有机物和消毒副产物前体方面的比较","authors":"Euis Nurul Hidayah,&nbsp;Okik Hendriyanto Cahyonugroho,&nbsp;Rizka Novembrianto,&nbsp;Kindriari Nurma Wahyusi,&nbsp;Endang Srihari","doi":"10.1002/clen.202300177","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Surface water is renowned for its natural organic matter, constituting approximately 45% of total dissolved organic carbon (DOC) which can be removed in water treatment plants. However, residual DOC in water can react with chlorine to form several carcinogenic disinfectant by-products (DBPs). This study aimed to examine the molecular weight of organic fractions dissolved in three different water sources that act as precursors to the formation of DBPs species. The coagulants used were Al- and Fe-based, frequently used in water treatment plants to remove organic fractions. Characterization of DOC in source water served as the first step in determining the performance of both coagulants in terms of organic properties. The results showed that the selected surface waters had similar DOC characteristics, including biopolymers, humic substances, building blocks, and a low molecular weight. These fractions contributed to the formation of trihalomethanes (THMs) and haloacetic acids (HAAs). The Fe-based coagulant was more effective than the Al-based coagulant in removing all organic fractions and reducing THMs compared to HAAs. Furthermore, one-way ANOVA analysis showed a significant difference in the average removal of organic fractions and DBP species between the Fe-based and Al-based coagulants. The Fe-based coagulant showed higher efficiency in removing biopolymers, dibromochloromethane, and chlorodibromoacetic acid than the Al-based coagulant. In contrast, the Al-based coagulant had better performance in reducing dibromo HAA and tribromo HAA. Both coagulants had no significant difference in extracting other organic fractions or DBPs species.</p>","PeriodicalId":10306,"journal":{"name":"Clean-soil Air Water","volume":"52 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison of Fe-based and Al-based coagulants in the removal of organic and disinfection by-product precursors\",\"authors\":\"Euis Nurul Hidayah,&nbsp;Okik Hendriyanto Cahyonugroho,&nbsp;Rizka Novembrianto,&nbsp;Kindriari Nurma Wahyusi,&nbsp;Endang Srihari\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/clen.202300177\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Surface water is renowned for its natural organic matter, constituting approximately 45% of total dissolved organic carbon (DOC) which can be removed in water treatment plants. However, residual DOC in water can react with chlorine to form several carcinogenic disinfectant by-products (DBPs). This study aimed to examine the molecular weight of organic fractions dissolved in three different water sources that act as precursors to the formation of DBPs species. The coagulants used were Al- and Fe-based, frequently used in water treatment plants to remove organic fractions. Characterization of DOC in source water served as the first step in determining the performance of both coagulants in terms of organic properties. The results showed that the selected surface waters had similar DOC characteristics, including biopolymers, humic substances, building blocks, and a low molecular weight. These fractions contributed to the formation of trihalomethanes (THMs) and haloacetic acids (HAAs). The Fe-based coagulant was more effective than the Al-based coagulant in removing all organic fractions and reducing THMs compared to HAAs. Furthermore, one-way ANOVA analysis showed a significant difference in the average removal of organic fractions and DBP species between the Fe-based and Al-based coagulants. The Fe-based coagulant showed higher efficiency in removing biopolymers, dibromochloromethane, and chlorodibromoacetic acid than the Al-based coagulant. In contrast, the Al-based coagulant had better performance in reducing dibromo HAA and tribromo HAA. Both coagulants had no significant difference in extracting other organic fractions or DBPs species.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":10306,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Clean-soil Air Water\",\"volume\":\"52 3\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-02-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Clean-soil Air Water\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/clen.202300177\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clean-soil Air Water","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/clen.202300177","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

地表水以其天然有机物而闻名,约占总溶解有机碳 (DOC) 的 45%,可在水处理厂中去除。然而,水中残留的 DOC 会与氯发生反应,形成多种致癌的消毒剂副产品(DBPs)。本研究旨在检测溶解在三种不同水源中作为 DBPs 物种形成前体的有机组分的分子量。使用的混凝剂是水处理厂常用的铝基和铁基混凝剂,用于去除有机馏分。对原水中的 DOC 进行表征是确定两种混凝剂有机特性性能的第一步。结果表明,所选地表水具有类似的 DOC 特性,包括生物聚合物、腐殖质、构件和低分子量。这些馏分有助于形成三卤甲烷(THMs)和卤乙酸(HAAs)。与铝基混凝剂相比,铁基混凝剂在去除所有有机馏分以及减少三卤甲烷(THMs)和卤乙酸(HAAs)方面更为有效。此外,单因子方差分析显示,铁基混凝剂和铝基混凝剂对有机馏分和 DBP 物种的平均去除率存在显著差异。与铝基混凝剂相比,铁基混凝剂去除生物聚合物、二溴氯甲烷和氯二溴乙酸的效率更高。相比之下,铝基混凝剂在减少二溴 HAA 和三溴 HAA 方面表现更好。两种混凝剂在萃取其他有机馏分或 DBPs 物种方面没有明显差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Comparison of Fe-based and Al-based coagulants in the removal of organic and disinfection by-product precursors

Comparison of Fe-based and Al-based coagulants in the removal of organic and disinfection by-product precursors

Surface water is renowned for its natural organic matter, constituting approximately 45% of total dissolved organic carbon (DOC) which can be removed in water treatment plants. However, residual DOC in water can react with chlorine to form several carcinogenic disinfectant by-products (DBPs). This study aimed to examine the molecular weight of organic fractions dissolved in three different water sources that act as precursors to the formation of DBPs species. The coagulants used were Al- and Fe-based, frequently used in water treatment plants to remove organic fractions. Characterization of DOC in source water served as the first step in determining the performance of both coagulants in terms of organic properties. The results showed that the selected surface waters had similar DOC characteristics, including biopolymers, humic substances, building blocks, and a low molecular weight. These fractions contributed to the formation of trihalomethanes (THMs) and haloacetic acids (HAAs). The Fe-based coagulant was more effective than the Al-based coagulant in removing all organic fractions and reducing THMs compared to HAAs. Furthermore, one-way ANOVA analysis showed a significant difference in the average removal of organic fractions and DBP species between the Fe-based and Al-based coagulants. The Fe-based coagulant showed higher efficiency in removing biopolymers, dibromochloromethane, and chlorodibromoacetic acid than the Al-based coagulant. In contrast, the Al-based coagulant had better performance in reducing dibromo HAA and tribromo HAA. Both coagulants had no significant difference in extracting other organic fractions or DBPs species.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Clean-soil Air Water
Clean-soil Air Water 环境科学-海洋与淡水生物学
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
5.90%
发文量
88
审稿时长
3.6 months
期刊介绍: CLEAN covers all aspects of Sustainability and Environmental Safety. The journal focuses on organ/human--environment interactions giving interdisciplinary insights on a broad range of topics including air pollution, waste management, the water cycle, and environmental conservation. With a 2019 Journal Impact Factor of 1.603 (Journal Citation Reports (Clarivate Analytics, 2020), the journal publishes an attractive mixture of peer-reviewed scientific reviews, research papers, and short communications. Papers dealing with environmental sustainability issues from such fields as agriculture, biological sciences, energy, food sciences, geography, geology, meteorology, nutrition, soil and water sciences, etc., are welcome.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信