Vadthya Jagan, Bhavadish Chary Maheshwaram, Mallesh Usirikapally, Praveen Kumar Balachandran, B. Nagi Reddy, Sankeerthana Mettu, C. Dhanamjayulu, G. Arunkumar, K. C. Saranya, Baseem Khan
{"title":"针对增强型超高增益 Z 网络拓扑结构的不同 PWM 技术分析","authors":"Vadthya Jagan, Bhavadish Chary Maheshwaram, Mallesh Usirikapally, Praveen Kumar Balachandran, B. Nagi Reddy, Sankeerthana Mettu, C. Dhanamjayulu, G. Arunkumar, K. C. Saranya, Baseem Khan","doi":"10.1155/2024/6645798","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>In these modern times, the Z-source inverters (ZSIs) have become a revolutionary invention ever since the year 2002. The pulse-width modulation (PWM) technique used for most of the ZSIs is simple boost control PWM (SBC-PWM), and the SBC-PWM implies for a greater voltage stress on the inverter bridge and provides less boost factor. Likewise, many topologies for the basic Z-source topologies are evolved, and different PWM techniques are applied to them such as maximum boost control (MBC), maximum boost control with third harmonic injection (MBC-THI), maximum constant boost control (MCBC), and constant boost control with third harmonic injection (CBC-THI). All these mentioned PWM techniques are compared, and the converter opted in this paper is an enhanced ultrahigh gain active-switched quasi-Z-source inverter (EUHG-qZSI). The comparisons discussed in this brief are bridge stress, voltage gain, and voltage boost variation under each control strategy implementation. The theoretical and simulation evaluation for the abovementioned findings is presented in this paper, and the best PWM among them is maximum boost control (MBC).</p>","PeriodicalId":51293,"journal":{"name":"International Transactions on Electrical Energy Systems","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Analysis of Different PWM Techniques for Enhanced Ultrahigh Gain Z-Network Topology\",\"authors\":\"Vadthya Jagan, Bhavadish Chary Maheshwaram, Mallesh Usirikapally, Praveen Kumar Balachandran, B. Nagi Reddy, Sankeerthana Mettu, C. Dhanamjayulu, G. Arunkumar, K. C. Saranya, Baseem Khan\",\"doi\":\"10.1155/2024/6645798\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>In these modern times, the Z-source inverters (ZSIs) have become a revolutionary invention ever since the year 2002. The pulse-width modulation (PWM) technique used for most of the ZSIs is simple boost control PWM (SBC-PWM), and the SBC-PWM implies for a greater voltage stress on the inverter bridge and provides less boost factor. Likewise, many topologies for the basic Z-source topologies are evolved, and different PWM techniques are applied to them such as maximum boost control (MBC), maximum boost control with third harmonic injection (MBC-THI), maximum constant boost control (MCBC), and constant boost control with third harmonic injection (CBC-THI). All these mentioned PWM techniques are compared, and the converter opted in this paper is an enhanced ultrahigh gain active-switched quasi-Z-source inverter (EUHG-qZSI). The comparisons discussed in this brief are bridge stress, voltage gain, and voltage boost variation under each control strategy implementation. The theoretical and simulation evaluation for the abovementioned findings is presented in this paper, and the best PWM among them is maximum boost control (MBC).</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":51293,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Transactions on Electrical Energy Systems\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-02-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Transactions on Electrical Energy Systems\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1155/2024/6645798\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, ELECTRICAL & ELECTRONIC\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Transactions on Electrical Energy Systems","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1155/2024/6645798","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, ELECTRICAL & ELECTRONIC","Score":null,"Total":0}
Analysis of Different PWM Techniques for Enhanced Ultrahigh Gain Z-Network Topology
In these modern times, the Z-source inverters (ZSIs) have become a revolutionary invention ever since the year 2002. The pulse-width modulation (PWM) technique used for most of the ZSIs is simple boost control PWM (SBC-PWM), and the SBC-PWM implies for a greater voltage stress on the inverter bridge and provides less boost factor. Likewise, many topologies for the basic Z-source topologies are evolved, and different PWM techniques are applied to them such as maximum boost control (MBC), maximum boost control with third harmonic injection (MBC-THI), maximum constant boost control (MCBC), and constant boost control with third harmonic injection (CBC-THI). All these mentioned PWM techniques are compared, and the converter opted in this paper is an enhanced ultrahigh gain active-switched quasi-Z-source inverter (EUHG-qZSI). The comparisons discussed in this brief are bridge stress, voltage gain, and voltage boost variation under each control strategy implementation. The theoretical and simulation evaluation for the abovementioned findings is presented in this paper, and the best PWM among them is maximum boost control (MBC).
期刊介绍:
International Transactions on Electrical Energy Systems publishes original research results on key advances in the generation, transmission, and distribution of electrical energy systems. Of particular interest are submissions concerning the modeling, analysis, optimization and control of advanced electric power systems.
Manuscripts on topics of economics, finance, policies, insulation materials, low-voltage power electronics, plasmas, and magnetics will generally not be considered for review.