Lee R. Long, Mark Foster, Kara Burr, J. Kim Penberthy, Tracy N. Baker, James P. McCullough
{"title":"拆解认知行为分析心理治疗系统的试点研究:识别有效成分","authors":"Lee R. Long, Mark Foster, Kara Burr, J. Kim Penberthy, Tracy N. Baker, James P. McCullough","doi":"10.1007/s10608-024-10467-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Background</h3><p>CBASP is a learning acquisition model of psychotherapy and until this present study, has not been systematically dismantled to identify the active ingredient.</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Methods</h3><p>The present investigation is the first formal dismantling pilot-study conducted to date on the Cognitive Behavioral Analysis System of Psychotherapy (CBASP). The two major treatment components of CBASP, Situational Analysis (SA) and the Interpersonal Discrimination Exercise (IDE), were administered alone and with CBASP treatment-as-usual (the combination of both) to determine if there were active ingredients operative in the model. Secondly, we questioned if the dismantling of CBASP should continue in a larger study in an effort to answer the greater dismantling question of whether to administer both SA and IDE separately based on the active ingredient outcomes.</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Results</h3><p>The study did achieve visually inspected differential data patterns across the three groups of the dependent measures. Based on these outcomes, a larger dismantling study seems warranted and is recommended.</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Conclusions</h3><p>We strongly urge that a larger dismantling study using a similar design be conducted in an effort to further the dismantling process of the CBASP model.</p>","PeriodicalId":48316,"journal":{"name":"Cognitive Therapy and Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Pilot Study Dismantling the Cognitive Behavioral Analysis System of Psychotherapy: Identifying the Active Ingredients\",\"authors\":\"Lee R. Long, Mark Foster, Kara Burr, J. Kim Penberthy, Tracy N. Baker, James P. McCullough\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s10608-024-10467-z\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<h3 data-test=\\\"abstract-sub-heading\\\">Background</h3><p>CBASP is a learning acquisition model of psychotherapy and until this present study, has not been systematically dismantled to identify the active ingredient.</p><h3 data-test=\\\"abstract-sub-heading\\\">Methods</h3><p>The present investigation is the first formal dismantling pilot-study conducted to date on the Cognitive Behavioral Analysis System of Psychotherapy (CBASP). The two major treatment components of CBASP, Situational Analysis (SA) and the Interpersonal Discrimination Exercise (IDE), were administered alone and with CBASP treatment-as-usual (the combination of both) to determine if there were active ingredients operative in the model. Secondly, we questioned if the dismantling of CBASP should continue in a larger study in an effort to answer the greater dismantling question of whether to administer both SA and IDE separately based on the active ingredient outcomes.</p><h3 data-test=\\\"abstract-sub-heading\\\">Results</h3><p>The study did achieve visually inspected differential data patterns across the three groups of the dependent measures. Based on these outcomes, a larger dismantling study seems warranted and is recommended.</p><h3 data-test=\\\"abstract-sub-heading\\\">Conclusions</h3><p>We strongly urge that a larger dismantling study using a similar design be conducted in an effort to further the dismantling process of the CBASP model.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48316,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Cognitive Therapy and Research\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-02-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Cognitive Therapy and Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10608-024-10467-z\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cognitive Therapy and Research","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10608-024-10467-z","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
背景CBASP是一种心理治疗的学习习得模式,在本研究之前,尚未对其进行过系统的拆解以确定其有效成分。我们对 CBASP 的两个主要治疗组成部分--情境分析(SA)和人际歧视练习(IDE)--进行了单独治疗和 CBASP 正常治疗(两者的结合),以确定该模型中是否存在有效成分。其次,我们质疑是否应在更大规模的研究中继续对 CBASP 进行拆解,以回答是否应根据活性成分结果对 SA 和 IDE 分别进行治疗这一更大的拆解问题。结论我们强烈建议采用类似的设计进行更大规模的拆解研究,以进一步推动 CBASP 模型的拆解过程。
Pilot Study Dismantling the Cognitive Behavioral Analysis System of Psychotherapy: Identifying the Active Ingredients
Background
CBASP is a learning acquisition model of psychotherapy and until this present study, has not been systematically dismantled to identify the active ingredient.
Methods
The present investigation is the first formal dismantling pilot-study conducted to date on the Cognitive Behavioral Analysis System of Psychotherapy (CBASP). The two major treatment components of CBASP, Situational Analysis (SA) and the Interpersonal Discrimination Exercise (IDE), were administered alone and with CBASP treatment-as-usual (the combination of both) to determine if there were active ingredients operative in the model. Secondly, we questioned if the dismantling of CBASP should continue in a larger study in an effort to answer the greater dismantling question of whether to administer both SA and IDE separately based on the active ingredient outcomes.
Results
The study did achieve visually inspected differential data patterns across the three groups of the dependent measures. Based on these outcomes, a larger dismantling study seems warranted and is recommended.
Conclusions
We strongly urge that a larger dismantling study using a similar design be conducted in an effort to further the dismantling process of the CBASP model.
期刊介绍:
Cognitive Therapy and Research (COTR) focuses on the investigation of cognitive processes in human adaptation and adjustment and cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT). It is an interdisciplinary journal welcoming submissions from diverse areas of psychology, including cognitive, clinical, developmental, experimental, personality, social, learning, affective neuroscience, emotion research, therapy mechanism, and pharmacotherapy.