利用地球静止卫星风云四号 A 的 AOD 和机器学习模型对大曼谷地区每小时 PM2.5 进行时空估算

IF 2.9 4区 环境科学与生态学 Q3 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
Nishit Aman, Kasemsan Manomaiphiboon, Di Xian, Ling Gao, Lin Tian, Natchanok Pala-En, Yangjun Wang, Komsilp Wangyao
{"title":"利用地球静止卫星风云四号 A 的 AOD 和机器学习模型对大曼谷地区每小时 PM2.5 进行时空估算","authors":"Nishit Aman,&nbsp;Kasemsan Manomaiphiboon,&nbsp;Di Xian,&nbsp;Ling Gao,&nbsp;Lin Tian,&nbsp;Natchanok Pala-En,&nbsp;Yangjun Wang,&nbsp;Komsilp Wangyao","doi":"10.1007/s11869-024-01524-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>This study used four individual machine learning (ML) models (random forest, adaptive boosting, gradient boosting, and extreme gradient boosting), and a stacked ensemble model (SEM) for PM<sub>2.5</sub> estimation over Greater Bangkok (GBK) during the dry season for 2018–2022. Aerosol optical depth (AOD) from Fengyun-4A satellite was used as the main predictor variable. The other predictor variables include meteorological variables, fire hotspots, vegetation index, terrain elevation, and population density. Surface PM<sub>2.5</sub> from 17 air quality monitoring stations was used for model development and evaluation. Satellite AOD aligns reasonably well with AOD from two AERONET stations in the study area in terms of correlation coefficient (<i>r</i>), mean bias (MB), mean error (ME), and root mean square error (RMSE). Among the individual models, adaptive boosting performed the best with <i>r</i> = 0.75, MB = 0.55 µg m<sup>−3</sup>, ME = 9.1 µg m<sup>−3</sup>, and RMSE = 12.9 µg m<sup>−3</sup>. As for SEM which comprises all individual models, it outperformed every individual model, with <i>r</i> = 0.84, zero MB, ME = 7.2 µg m<sup>−3</sup>, and RMSE = 10.4 µg m<sup>−3</sup>. In two additional cases of haze hours and clean hours, SEM is best overall while adaptive boosting is superior to the other individual ML models. The case of haze hours has lower model predictability, suggesting elevated PM<sub>2.5</sub> is difficult to predict. SEM was thus chosen to map PM<sub>2.5</sub> as well as exposure intensity over GBK. Good agreement between the observed and predicted diurnal and monthly patterns is achieved by every model. PM<sub>2.5</sub> tends to be relatively high at 08–10 LT and declines in later hours, corresponding to higher traffic emissions in the morning and daytime meteorological conditions more favorable to dilute air pollutants, respectively. PM<sub>2.5</sub> intensifies in the winter but decreases in March and April. During these two months, the areas outside Bangkok tend to have higher PM<sub>2.5</sub> than within Bangkok, possibly linked to active summertime biomass burning in those areas that are less urbanized with more agricultural lands. Relatively high exposure intensity is constrained to Bangkok due likely to its much denser population. The findings indicate a significant potential for leveraging the Fengyun-4A satellite data and ML to advance space-based air quality monitoring for Thailand and other data-scare regions in Southeast Asia. A satellite-based PM<sub>2.5</sub> dataset could support the formulation of effective air quality management strategies in GBK.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":49109,"journal":{"name":"Air Quality Atmosphere and Health","volume":"17 7","pages":"1519 - 1534"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Spatiotemporal estimation of hourly PM2.5 using AOD derived from geostationary satellite Fengyun-4A and machine learning models for Greater Bangkok\",\"authors\":\"Nishit Aman,&nbsp;Kasemsan Manomaiphiboon,&nbsp;Di Xian,&nbsp;Ling Gao,&nbsp;Lin Tian,&nbsp;Natchanok Pala-En,&nbsp;Yangjun Wang,&nbsp;Komsilp Wangyao\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s11869-024-01524-3\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>This study used four individual machine learning (ML) models (random forest, adaptive boosting, gradient boosting, and extreme gradient boosting), and a stacked ensemble model (SEM) for PM<sub>2.5</sub> estimation over Greater Bangkok (GBK) during the dry season for 2018–2022. Aerosol optical depth (AOD) from Fengyun-4A satellite was used as the main predictor variable. The other predictor variables include meteorological variables, fire hotspots, vegetation index, terrain elevation, and population density. Surface PM<sub>2.5</sub> from 17 air quality monitoring stations was used for model development and evaluation. Satellite AOD aligns reasonably well with AOD from two AERONET stations in the study area in terms of correlation coefficient (<i>r</i>), mean bias (MB), mean error (ME), and root mean square error (RMSE). Among the individual models, adaptive boosting performed the best with <i>r</i> = 0.75, MB = 0.55 µg m<sup>−3</sup>, ME = 9.1 µg m<sup>−3</sup>, and RMSE = 12.9 µg m<sup>−3</sup>. As for SEM which comprises all individual models, it outperformed every individual model, with <i>r</i> = 0.84, zero MB, ME = 7.2 µg m<sup>−3</sup>, and RMSE = 10.4 µg m<sup>−3</sup>. In two additional cases of haze hours and clean hours, SEM is best overall while adaptive boosting is superior to the other individual ML models. The case of haze hours has lower model predictability, suggesting elevated PM<sub>2.5</sub> is difficult to predict. SEM was thus chosen to map PM<sub>2.5</sub> as well as exposure intensity over GBK. Good agreement between the observed and predicted diurnal and monthly patterns is achieved by every model. PM<sub>2.5</sub> tends to be relatively high at 08–10 LT and declines in later hours, corresponding to higher traffic emissions in the morning and daytime meteorological conditions more favorable to dilute air pollutants, respectively. PM<sub>2.5</sub> intensifies in the winter but decreases in March and April. During these two months, the areas outside Bangkok tend to have higher PM<sub>2.5</sub> than within Bangkok, possibly linked to active summertime biomass burning in those areas that are less urbanized with more agricultural lands. Relatively high exposure intensity is constrained to Bangkok due likely to its much denser population. The findings indicate a significant potential for leveraging the Fengyun-4A satellite data and ML to advance space-based air quality monitoring for Thailand and other data-scare regions in Southeast Asia. A satellite-based PM<sub>2.5</sub> dataset could support the formulation of effective air quality management strategies in GBK.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49109,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Air Quality Atmosphere and Health\",\"volume\":\"17 7\",\"pages\":\"1519 - 1534\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-02-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Air Quality Atmosphere and Health\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11869-024-01524-3\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Air Quality Atmosphere and Health","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11869-024-01524-3","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究使用了四个单独的机器学习(ML)模型(随机森林、自适应增强、梯度增强和极端梯度增强)和一个堆叠集合模型(SEM)来估算2018-2022年旱季大曼谷地区(GBK)的PM2.5。风云四号 A 卫星的气溶胶光学深度(AOD)被用作主要预测变量。其他预测变量包括气象变量、火灾热点、植被指数、地形高程和人口密度。17 个空气质量监测站的地面 PM2.5 被用于模型开发和评估。在相关系数(r)、平均偏差(MB)、平均误差(ME)和均方根误差(RMSE)方面,卫星 AOD 与研究区域内两个 AERONET 监测站的 AOD 大致吻合。在单个模型中,自适应增强模型表现最好,r = 0.75,MB = 0.55 µg m-3,ME = 9.1 µg m-3,RMSE = 12.9 µg m-3。至于由所有单个模型组成的 SEM,其表现优于所有单个模型,r = 0.84,MB 为 0,ME = 7.2 µg m-3,RMSE = 10.4 µg m-3。在灰霾小时和清洁小时这两种额外情况下,SEM 的总体表现最佳,而自适应增强则优于其他单个 ML 模型。雾霾时段的模型预测性较低,表明 PM2.5 的升高难以预测。因此,选择了 SEM 来绘制 GBK 的 PM2.5 以及暴露强度图。每个模型都能在观测和预测的昼夜模式和月度模式之间实现良好的一致性。PM2.5往往在08-10时相对较高,并在晚些时候下降,这分别与早晨较高的交通排放量和白天更有利于稀释空气污染物的气象条件相对应。PM2.5 在冬季会加剧,但在 3 月和 4 月会下降。在这两个月中,曼谷以外地区的 PM2.5 往往高于曼谷以内地区,这可能与那些城市化程度较低、农田较多的地区夏季活跃的生物质燃烧有关。曼谷的暴露强度相对较高,这可能是由于曼谷的人口密度更大。研究结果表明,利用风云四号 A 卫星数据和多边监测模式推进泰国和东南亚其他数据敏感地区的天基空气质量监测具有巨大潜力。基于卫星的 PM2.5 数据集可为制定有效的 GBK 空气质量管理策略提供支持。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Spatiotemporal estimation of hourly PM2.5 using AOD derived from geostationary satellite Fengyun-4A and machine learning models for Greater Bangkok

Spatiotemporal estimation of hourly PM2.5 using AOD derived from geostationary satellite Fengyun-4A and machine learning models for Greater Bangkok

Spatiotemporal estimation of hourly PM2.5 using AOD derived from geostationary satellite Fengyun-4A and machine learning models for Greater Bangkok

This study used four individual machine learning (ML) models (random forest, adaptive boosting, gradient boosting, and extreme gradient boosting), and a stacked ensemble model (SEM) for PM2.5 estimation over Greater Bangkok (GBK) during the dry season for 2018–2022. Aerosol optical depth (AOD) from Fengyun-4A satellite was used as the main predictor variable. The other predictor variables include meteorological variables, fire hotspots, vegetation index, terrain elevation, and population density. Surface PM2.5 from 17 air quality monitoring stations was used for model development and evaluation. Satellite AOD aligns reasonably well with AOD from two AERONET stations in the study area in terms of correlation coefficient (r), mean bias (MB), mean error (ME), and root mean square error (RMSE). Among the individual models, adaptive boosting performed the best with r = 0.75, MB = 0.55 µg m−3, ME = 9.1 µg m−3, and RMSE = 12.9 µg m−3. As for SEM which comprises all individual models, it outperformed every individual model, with r = 0.84, zero MB, ME = 7.2 µg m−3, and RMSE = 10.4 µg m−3. In two additional cases of haze hours and clean hours, SEM is best overall while adaptive boosting is superior to the other individual ML models. The case of haze hours has lower model predictability, suggesting elevated PM2.5 is difficult to predict. SEM was thus chosen to map PM2.5 as well as exposure intensity over GBK. Good agreement between the observed and predicted diurnal and monthly patterns is achieved by every model. PM2.5 tends to be relatively high at 08–10 LT and declines in later hours, corresponding to higher traffic emissions in the morning and daytime meteorological conditions more favorable to dilute air pollutants, respectively. PM2.5 intensifies in the winter but decreases in March and April. During these two months, the areas outside Bangkok tend to have higher PM2.5 than within Bangkok, possibly linked to active summertime biomass burning in those areas that are less urbanized with more agricultural lands. Relatively high exposure intensity is constrained to Bangkok due likely to its much denser population. The findings indicate a significant potential for leveraging the Fengyun-4A satellite data and ML to advance space-based air quality monitoring for Thailand and other data-scare regions in Southeast Asia. A satellite-based PM2.5 dataset could support the formulation of effective air quality management strategies in GBK.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Air Quality Atmosphere and Health
Air Quality Atmosphere and Health ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES-
CiteScore
8.80
自引率
2.00%
发文量
146
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Air Quality, Atmosphere, and Health is a multidisciplinary journal which, by its very name, illustrates the broad range of work it publishes and which focuses on atmospheric consequences of human activities and their implications for human and ecological health. It offers research papers, critical literature reviews and commentaries, as well as special issues devoted to topical subjects or themes. International in scope, the journal presents papers that inform and stimulate a global readership, as the topic addressed are global in their import. Consequently, we do not encourage submission of papers involving local data that relate to local problems. Unless they demonstrate wide applicability, these are better submitted to national or regional journals. Air Quality, Atmosphere & Health addresses such topics as acid precipitation; airborne particulate matter; air quality monitoring and management; exposure assessment; risk assessment; indoor air quality; atmospheric chemistry; atmospheric modeling and prediction; air pollution climatology; climate change and air quality; air pollution measurement; atmospheric impact assessment; forest-fire emissions; atmospheric science; greenhouse gases; health and ecological effects; clean air technology; regional and global change and satellite measurements. This journal benefits a diverse audience of researchers, public health officials and policy makers addressing problems that call for solutions based in evidence from atmospheric and exposure assessment scientists, epidemiologists, and risk assessors. Publication in the journal affords the opportunity to reach beyond defined disciplinary niches to this broader readership.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信