用绵羊清除秋季生长的牧草:对头割青贮饲料产量和质量以及奶牛后续生产性能的影响

IF 2.7 3区 农林科学 Q1 AGRONOMY
Aimee-Louise Craig, Alan W. Gordon, Conrad P. Ferris
{"title":"用绵羊清除秋季生长的牧草:对头割青贮饲料产量和质量以及奶牛后续生产性能的影响","authors":"Aimee-Louise Craig,&nbsp;Alan W. Gordon,&nbsp;Conrad P. Ferris","doi":"10.1111/gfs.12654","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Grass which grows during the autumn is perceived by some farmers to have a negative impact on the nutritive value of silage produced the following spring. The impact of removing herbage in the autumn using sheep, on silage yield and quality the following spring, and on performance of cows offered these silages, was investigated in two experiments. Following harvest of third-cut silage in September, a grass sward was split into blocks which were either grazed by sheep during November and December or left ungrazed. Herbage was harvested and ensiled the following May and offered to late-lactation Holstein cows in a two-period balanced change-over design feeding experiment comprising two 28-d periods. In Experiment 1, silage quality was unaffected by autumn grazing treatment but in Experiment 2, silage from swards grazed in autumn had a higher metabolizable energy concentration (0.5 MJ kg<sup>−1</sup> dry matter [DM]; <i>p</i> = .016). In Experiment 1, intakes were unaffected, while cows offered silage from the grazed sward (GS) had a greater milk (0.8 kg d<sup>−1</sup>; <i>p</i> &lt; .001) and protein yield (0.03 kg d<sup>−1</sup>; <i>p</i> = .014) than cows offered silage from the ungrazed sward, but fat plus protein yield was unaffected. In Experiment 2, cows offered GS had greater DM intake (1.5 kg d<sup>−1</sup>; <i>p</i> &lt; .001) and fat yield (0.15 kg d<sup>−1</sup>; <i>p</i> = .047), but fat plus protein yield was not significantly different between treatments. In conclusion, winter grazing using sheep has potential to improve silage quality, but with marginal benefits on individual cow performance.</p>","PeriodicalId":12767,"journal":{"name":"Grass and Forage Science","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Removal of autumn-growth herbage using sheep: Effects on yield and quality of first cut silage and subsequent cow performance\",\"authors\":\"Aimee-Louise Craig,&nbsp;Alan W. Gordon,&nbsp;Conrad P. Ferris\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/gfs.12654\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Grass which grows during the autumn is perceived by some farmers to have a negative impact on the nutritive value of silage produced the following spring. The impact of removing herbage in the autumn using sheep, on silage yield and quality the following spring, and on performance of cows offered these silages, was investigated in two experiments. Following harvest of third-cut silage in September, a grass sward was split into blocks which were either grazed by sheep during November and December or left ungrazed. Herbage was harvested and ensiled the following May and offered to late-lactation Holstein cows in a two-period balanced change-over design feeding experiment comprising two 28-d periods. In Experiment 1, silage quality was unaffected by autumn grazing treatment but in Experiment 2, silage from swards grazed in autumn had a higher metabolizable energy concentration (0.5 MJ kg<sup>−1</sup> dry matter [DM]; <i>p</i> = .016). In Experiment 1, intakes were unaffected, while cows offered silage from the grazed sward (GS) had a greater milk (0.8 kg d<sup>−1</sup>; <i>p</i> &lt; .001) and protein yield (0.03 kg d<sup>−1</sup>; <i>p</i> = .014) than cows offered silage from the ungrazed sward, but fat plus protein yield was unaffected. In Experiment 2, cows offered GS had greater DM intake (1.5 kg d<sup>−1</sup>; <i>p</i> &lt; .001) and fat yield (0.15 kg d<sup>−1</sup>; <i>p</i> = .047), but fat plus protein yield was not significantly different between treatments. In conclusion, winter grazing using sheep has potential to improve silage quality, but with marginal benefits on individual cow performance.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12767,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Grass and Forage Science\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-02-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Grass and Forage Science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/gfs.12654\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"AGRONOMY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Grass and Forage Science","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/gfs.12654","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AGRONOMY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

一些牧场主认为,秋季生长的草会对来年春季生产的青贮饲料的营养价值产生负面影响。在两项实验中,研究了用羊在秋季清除草料对第二年春季青贮饲料产量和质量的影响,以及对食用这些青贮饲料的奶牛生产性能的影响。在 9 月份收获三茬青贮饲料后,将草地分成若干块,在 11 月和 12 月期间由绵羊放牧或不放牧。次年 5 月收割并腌制青贮饲料,然后在两期平衡转换设计饲喂试验中喂给哺乳后期的荷斯坦奶牛,试验分为两个 28 天的阶段。在实验 1 中,青贮饲料的质量不受秋季放牧处理的影响,但在实验 2 中,来自秋季放牧草场的青贮饲料具有更高的代谢能浓度(0.5 MJ kg-1 干物质 [DM];p = .016)。在实验 1 中,奶牛的摄入量未受影响,而与未放牧草地的青贮饲料相比,放牧草地青贮饲料(GS)的奶牛产奶量(0.8 千克/天-1;p = 0.001)和蛋白质产量(0.03 千克/天-1;p = 0.014)更高,但脂肪和蛋白质产量未受影响。在实验 2 中,提供 GS 的奶牛的 DM 摄入量(1.5 kg d-1;p = 0.001)和脂肪产量(0.15 kg d-1;p = 0.047)均高于提供未放牧草地青贮饲料的奶牛,但脂肪加蛋白质产量在不同处理之间没有显著差异。总之,使用绵羊进行冬季放牧有可能提高青贮饲料的质量,但对奶牛个体性能的影响微乎其微。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Removal of autumn-growth herbage using sheep: Effects on yield and quality of first cut silage and subsequent cow performance

Grass which grows during the autumn is perceived by some farmers to have a negative impact on the nutritive value of silage produced the following spring. The impact of removing herbage in the autumn using sheep, on silage yield and quality the following spring, and on performance of cows offered these silages, was investigated in two experiments. Following harvest of third-cut silage in September, a grass sward was split into blocks which were either grazed by sheep during November and December or left ungrazed. Herbage was harvested and ensiled the following May and offered to late-lactation Holstein cows in a two-period balanced change-over design feeding experiment comprising two 28-d periods. In Experiment 1, silage quality was unaffected by autumn grazing treatment but in Experiment 2, silage from swards grazed in autumn had a higher metabolizable energy concentration (0.5 MJ kg−1 dry matter [DM]; p = .016). In Experiment 1, intakes were unaffected, while cows offered silage from the grazed sward (GS) had a greater milk (0.8 kg d−1; p < .001) and protein yield (0.03 kg d−1; p = .014) than cows offered silage from the ungrazed sward, but fat plus protein yield was unaffected. In Experiment 2, cows offered GS had greater DM intake (1.5 kg d−1; p < .001) and fat yield (0.15 kg d−1; p = .047), but fat plus protein yield was not significantly different between treatments. In conclusion, winter grazing using sheep has potential to improve silage quality, but with marginal benefits on individual cow performance.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Grass and Forage Science
Grass and Forage Science 农林科学-农艺学
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
8.30%
发文量
37
审稿时长
12 months
期刊介绍: Grass and Forage Science is a major English language journal that publishes the results of research and development in all aspects of grass and forage production, management and utilization; reviews of the state of knowledge on relevant topics; and book reviews. Authors are also invited to submit papers on non-agricultural aspects of grassland management such as recreational and amenity use and the environmental implications of all grassland systems. The Journal considers papers from all climatic zones.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信