Julianne A. Walsh PhD, RN , Kristen A. Sethares PhD, RN, CNE, FAHA, FHFSA , Jennifer Dunbar Viveiros PhD, RN, CNE , Marilyn E. Asselin PhD, RN
{"title":"反思性日记促进批判性反思后模拟教育","authors":"Julianne A. Walsh PhD, RN , Kristen A. Sethares PhD, RN, CNE, FAHA, FHFSA , Jennifer Dunbar Viveiros PhD, RN, CNE , Marilyn E. Asselin PhD, RN","doi":"10.1016/j.ecns.2024.101511","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Reflective journaling may be a useful method to promote the processes of reflection and critical reflection post simulation debriefing.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Guided by the AMNP and CRI models, this 3-week quasi-experimental two group pretest-posttest study tested the effects of guided reflective journaling on reflective thinking and critical reflective thinking in 54 prelicensure nursing students (n = 25 intervention and 29 control). The Reflection subscale of the Reflective Thinking Inventory (RTI, 3-15, higher better reflection) and Critical Reflective Thinking Inventory (CRIAT, 0-180, higher scores better critical reflection) measured reflection and critical reflection, respectively.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>MANCOVA demonstrated no differences over time and no interaction effect on the outcome variables. There was a difference in level of reflection between groups with the control group demonstrating greater scores at both time points. Mean scores for critical reflection were slightly higher post intervention for the intervention group.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Findings suggest guided reflective journaling post-SBE may enhance critical reflection with a greater dose.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":48753,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Simulation in Nursing","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Reflective Journaling to Promote Critical Reflective Thinking Post-Simulation-Based Education\",\"authors\":\"Julianne A. Walsh PhD, RN , Kristen A. Sethares PhD, RN, CNE, FAHA, FHFSA , Jennifer Dunbar Viveiros PhD, RN, CNE , Marilyn E. Asselin PhD, RN\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ecns.2024.101511\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Reflective journaling may be a useful method to promote the processes of reflection and critical reflection post simulation debriefing.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Guided by the AMNP and CRI models, this 3-week quasi-experimental two group pretest-posttest study tested the effects of guided reflective journaling on reflective thinking and critical reflective thinking in 54 prelicensure nursing students (n = 25 intervention and 29 control). The Reflection subscale of the Reflective Thinking Inventory (RTI, 3-15, higher better reflection) and Critical Reflective Thinking Inventory (CRIAT, 0-180, higher scores better critical reflection) measured reflection and critical reflection, respectively.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>MANCOVA demonstrated no differences over time and no interaction effect on the outcome variables. There was a difference in level of reflection between groups with the control group demonstrating greater scores at both time points. Mean scores for critical reflection were slightly higher post intervention for the intervention group.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Findings suggest guided reflective journaling post-SBE may enhance critical reflection with a greater dose.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48753,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Clinical Simulation in Nursing\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-02-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Clinical Simulation in Nursing\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1876139924000033\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"NURSING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Simulation in Nursing","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1876139924000033","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
Reflective Journaling to Promote Critical Reflective Thinking Post-Simulation-Based Education
Background
Reflective journaling may be a useful method to promote the processes of reflection and critical reflection post simulation debriefing.
Methods
Guided by the AMNP and CRI models, this 3-week quasi-experimental two group pretest-posttest study tested the effects of guided reflective journaling on reflective thinking and critical reflective thinking in 54 prelicensure nursing students (n = 25 intervention and 29 control). The Reflection subscale of the Reflective Thinking Inventory (RTI, 3-15, higher better reflection) and Critical Reflective Thinking Inventory (CRIAT, 0-180, higher scores better critical reflection) measured reflection and critical reflection, respectively.
Results
MANCOVA demonstrated no differences over time and no interaction effect on the outcome variables. There was a difference in level of reflection between groups with the control group demonstrating greater scores at both time points. Mean scores for critical reflection were slightly higher post intervention for the intervention group.
Conclusion
Findings suggest guided reflective journaling post-SBE may enhance critical reflection with a greater dose.
期刊介绍:
Clinical Simulation in Nursing is an international, peer reviewed journal published online monthly. Clinical Simulation in Nursing is the official journal of the International Nursing Association for Clinical Simulation & Learning (INACSL) and reflects its mission to advance the science of healthcare simulation.
We will review and accept articles from other health provider disciplines, if they are determined to be of interest to our readership. The journal accepts manuscripts meeting one or more of the following criteria:
Research articles and literature reviews (e.g. systematic, scoping, umbrella, integrative, etc.) about simulation
Innovative teaching/learning strategies using simulation
Articles updating guidelines, regulations, and legislative policies that impact simulation
Leadership for simulation
Simulation operations
Clinical and academic uses of simulation.