金融知识的性别差异和测量误差

IF 4.3 2区 经济学 Q1 BUSINESS, FINANCE
Edoardo Lanciano, Daniele Previati, Ornella Ricci, F. Saverio Stentella Lopes
{"title":"金融知识的性别差异和测量误差","authors":"Edoardo Lanciano,&nbsp;Daniele Previati,&nbsp;Ornella Ricci,&nbsp;F. Saverio Stentella Lopes","doi":"10.1016/j.jbef.2024.100896","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>We study gender differences in stock market participation and financial resilience, appropriately controlling for financial literacy, as suggested by Almenberg and Dreber (2015). Financial literacy is very difficult to measure accurately, and our proxies generally contain a random error that spills over to other correlated variables, such as gender. Our main results show that after addressing measurement error with the instrumental variable approach proposed by Gillen et al. (2019), the gender gap in financial resilience is substantially reduced and becomes statistically indistinguishable from zero. This evidence suggests that financial literacy surveys should be carefully designed to reduce measurement error, for example by including multiple elicitations of the same item and providing a panel component.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":47026,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Finance","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Gender differences and measurement error in financial literacy\",\"authors\":\"Edoardo Lanciano,&nbsp;Daniele Previati,&nbsp;Ornella Ricci,&nbsp;F. Saverio Stentella Lopes\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jbef.2024.100896\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>We study gender differences in stock market participation and financial resilience, appropriately controlling for financial literacy, as suggested by Almenberg and Dreber (2015). Financial literacy is very difficult to measure accurately, and our proxies generally contain a random error that spills over to other correlated variables, such as gender. Our main results show that after addressing measurement error with the instrumental variable approach proposed by Gillen et al. (2019), the gender gap in financial resilience is substantially reduced and becomes statistically indistinguishable from zero. This evidence suggests that financial literacy surveys should be carefully designed to reduce measurement error, for example by including multiple elicitations of the same item and providing a panel component.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":47026,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Finance\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-02-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Finance\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"96\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S221463502400011X\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"经济学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"BUSINESS, FINANCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Finance","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S221463502400011X","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BUSINESS, FINANCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

根据 Almenberg 和 Dreber(2015 年)的建议,我们在适当控制金融素养的情况下,研究了股票市场参与度和金融复原力方面的性别差异。金融素养很难精确测量,我们的代用指标通常包含随机误差,这种误差会波及性别等其他相关变量。我们的主要结果表明,在使用 Gillen 等人(2019)提出的工具变量方法解决测量误差问题后,金融适应能力方面的性别差距大幅缩小,在统计上与零无异。这一证据表明,金融素养调查应精心设计,以减少测量误差,例如通过对同一项目进行多次征询和提供面板调查部分。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Gender differences and measurement error in financial literacy

We study gender differences in stock market participation and financial resilience, appropriately controlling for financial literacy, as suggested by Almenberg and Dreber (2015). Financial literacy is very difficult to measure accurately, and our proxies generally contain a random error that spills over to other correlated variables, such as gender. Our main results show that after addressing measurement error with the instrumental variable approach proposed by Gillen et al. (2019), the gender gap in financial resilience is substantially reduced and becomes statistically indistinguishable from zero. This evidence suggests that financial literacy surveys should be carefully designed to reduce measurement error, for example by including multiple elicitations of the same item and providing a panel component.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
13.20
自引率
6.10%
发文量
75
审稿时长
69 days
期刊介绍: Behavioral and Experimental Finance represent lenses and approaches through which we can view financial decision-making. The aim of the journal is to publish high quality research in all fields of finance, where such research is carried out with a behavioral perspective and / or is carried out via experimental methods. It is open to but not limited to papers which cover investigations of biases, the role of various neurological markers in financial decision making, national and organizational culture as it impacts financial decision making, sentiment and asset pricing, the design and implementation of experiments to investigate financial decision making and trading, methodological experiments, and natural experiments. Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Finance welcomes full-length and short letter papers in the area of behavioral finance and experimental finance. The focus is on rapid dissemination of high-impact research in these areas.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信