Chloe Bedard, Sara King-Dowling, Brian W Timmons, Mark A Ferro
{"title":"对患有和未患有慢性疾病的 3 至 5 岁儿童的粗大运动技能进行配对分析。","authors":"Chloe Bedard, Sara King-Dowling, Brian W Timmons, Mark A Ferro","doi":"10.1123/pes.2023-0069","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The purpose of this study was to compare the gross motor skills of children with a chronic physical illness with those of their healthy peers.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Data for children with a chronic physical illness come from the Multimorbidity in Children and Youth Across the Life Course study, and data from children without a physical illness come from the Health Outcomes and Physical Activity in Preschoolers study. Multimorbidity in Children and Youth Across the Life Course and Health Outcomes and Physical Activity in Preschoolers included children ages 3-5 years and administered the Peabody Development Motor Scales-second edition. Participants were sex and age matched (20 male and 15 female pairs; Mage = 54.03 [9.5] mo).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Gross motor skills scores were \"below average\" for 47% of children with a physical illness compared with 9% of children without a physical illness (P = .003). Matched-paired t tests detected significant differences in total gross motor scores (dz = -0.35), locomotor (dz = -0.31), and object control (dz = -0.39) scores, with healthy children exhibiting better motor skills, and no significant difference in stationary scores (dz = -0.19).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This skill gap may increase burden on children with physical illness and future research should assess gross motor skills longitudinally to establish whether the gap widens with age.</p>","PeriodicalId":49712,"journal":{"name":"Pediatric Exercise Science","volume":" ","pages":"1-6"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Matched-Pair Analysis of Gross Motor Skills of 3- to 5-Year-Old Children With and Without a Chronic Physical Illness.\",\"authors\":\"Chloe Bedard, Sara King-Dowling, Brian W Timmons, Mark A Ferro\",\"doi\":\"10.1123/pes.2023-0069\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The purpose of this study was to compare the gross motor skills of children with a chronic physical illness with those of their healthy peers.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Data for children with a chronic physical illness come from the Multimorbidity in Children and Youth Across the Life Course study, and data from children without a physical illness come from the Health Outcomes and Physical Activity in Preschoolers study. Multimorbidity in Children and Youth Across the Life Course and Health Outcomes and Physical Activity in Preschoolers included children ages 3-5 years and administered the Peabody Development Motor Scales-second edition. Participants were sex and age matched (20 male and 15 female pairs; Mage = 54.03 [9.5] mo).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Gross motor skills scores were \\\"below average\\\" for 47% of children with a physical illness compared with 9% of children without a physical illness (P = .003). Matched-paired t tests detected significant differences in total gross motor scores (dz = -0.35), locomotor (dz = -0.31), and object control (dz = -0.39) scores, with healthy children exhibiting better motor skills, and no significant difference in stationary scores (dz = -0.19).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This skill gap may increase burden on children with physical illness and future research should assess gross motor skills longitudinally to establish whether the gap widens with age.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49712,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Pediatric Exercise Science\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1-6\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-02-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Pediatric Exercise Science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1123/pes.2023-0069\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"PEDIATRICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pediatric Exercise Science","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1123/pes.2023-0069","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PEDIATRICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
目的:本研究旨在比较患有慢性躯体疾病的儿童与健康儿童的粗大运动技能:患有慢性躯体疾病的儿童的数据来自 "儿童和青少年一生中的多病症"(Multimorbidity in Children and Youth Across the Life Course)研究,无躯体疾病儿童的数据来自 "学龄前儿童的健康结果和体育活动"(Health Outcomes and Physical Activity in Preschoolers)研究。儿童和青少年一生中的多病症研究》和《学龄前儿童的健康结果和体育活动》的研究对象包括 3-5 岁的儿童,并使用了皮博迪发育运动量表(第二版)。参与者的性别和年龄均匹配(20 对男性和 15 对女性;年龄 = 54.03 [9.5] 个月):结果:47%患有躯体疾病的儿童的粗大运动技能得分 "低于平均水平",相比之下,9%未患有躯体疾病的儿童的粗大运动技能得分 "低于平均水平"(P = .003)。配对 t 检验发现,健康儿童在粗大运动总分(dz = -0.35)、运动(dz = -0.31)和物体控制(dz = -0.39)得分方面存在显著差异,而健康儿童的运动技能更好,但在静止得分方面没有显著差异(dz = -0.19):这种技能差距可能会增加罹患躯体疾病儿童的负担,未来的研究应纵向评估粗大运动技能,以确定这种差距是否会随着年龄的增长而扩大。
A Matched-Pair Analysis of Gross Motor Skills of 3- to 5-Year-Old Children With and Without a Chronic Physical Illness.
Purpose: The purpose of this study was to compare the gross motor skills of children with a chronic physical illness with those of their healthy peers.
Methods: Data for children with a chronic physical illness come from the Multimorbidity in Children and Youth Across the Life Course study, and data from children without a physical illness come from the Health Outcomes and Physical Activity in Preschoolers study. Multimorbidity in Children and Youth Across the Life Course and Health Outcomes and Physical Activity in Preschoolers included children ages 3-5 years and administered the Peabody Development Motor Scales-second edition. Participants were sex and age matched (20 male and 15 female pairs; Mage = 54.03 [9.5] mo).
Results: Gross motor skills scores were "below average" for 47% of children with a physical illness compared with 9% of children without a physical illness (P = .003). Matched-paired t tests detected significant differences in total gross motor scores (dz = -0.35), locomotor (dz = -0.31), and object control (dz = -0.39) scores, with healthy children exhibiting better motor skills, and no significant difference in stationary scores (dz = -0.19).
Conclusions: This skill gap may increase burden on children with physical illness and future research should assess gross motor skills longitudinally to establish whether the gap widens with age.
期刊介绍:
Pediatric Exercise Science is a journal committed to enriching the scientific knowledge of exercise during childhood and adolescence. To this end it publishes information that contributes to an understanding of (a) the unique aspects of the physiologic, physical, biochemical, and psychologic responses of children to exercise, (b) the role of exercise in the treatment of pediatric chronic diseases, (c) the importance of physical activity in the prevention of illness and preservation of wellness, and (d) the means by which participation in sports may be made safer and more enjoyable for children and youth. Consideration will be given for publication of work by various methodologies consistent with the scientific approach.
Besides original research, the journal includes review articles, abstracts from other journals, book reviews, and editorial comments. Pediatric Exercise Science encourages the expression of conflicting opinions regarding children and exercise by providing a forum for alternative viewpoints. At the same time it serves as a means of accumulating a base of research information that will allow application of experimental data to clinical practice. The scientific disciplines contributing to this body of knowledge are diverse. Therefore it is the purpose of this journal to provide a common focus for disseminating advances in the science of exercise during childhood. In doing so, the journal allows the opportunity for cross-fertilization of ideas between disciplines that will potentiate the growth of knowledge in this field. Pediatric Exercise Science seeks to stimulate new ideas regarding exercise in children and to increase the awareness of scientists, health care providers, and physical educators of the importance of exercise during childhood.