初级臼齿过早脱落后固定式和活动式间隙保持器的成功率和失败率。

IF 1.3 4区 医学 Q3 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE
Maria Abdin, Eilaf Ahmed, Rakan Hamad, Christian Splieth, Julian Schmoeckel
{"title":"初级臼齿过早脱落后固定式和活动式间隙保持器的成功率和失败率。","authors":"Maria Abdin, Eilaf Ahmed, Rakan Hamad, Christian Splieth, Julian Schmoeckel","doi":"10.3290/j.qi.b4984249","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The evidence base for the use of space maintainers is relatively sparce despite being used for decades after the premature loss of primary molars. This study aims to increase the dental evidence base via investigating retrospectively the success rates of prefabricated fixed and removable space maintainers inserted from 2019 to 2021 and followed up until February 2023 at a specialized university clinic and to identify reasons for any reported minor and major failure. The authors hypothesized that there is no significant difference in failure rates between fixed and removable space maintainers inserted after the premature loss of a single primary molar per quadrant.</p><p><strong>Method and materials: </strong>Patients' digital records were searched yielding 645 space maintainers. After the application of inclusion criteria, 157 (67%) fixed prefabricated space maintainers in 112 children and 77 (33%) removable space maintainers in 61 children were analyzed for an average of 18.4 ± 9.5 months.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Kaplan-Meier survival analysis with Mantel-Cox statistics showed an overall cumulative survival time of 31.6 months (SE = 1.15, 95% CI = 29.4 to 33.9). Major failure occurred significantly more in removable maintainers (n = 40/67, 59.7%), mostly due to loss of the appliance, compared to fixed space maintainers (n = 27/67, 40.3%; P < .001). The present study indicates that space maintainers were mainly placed in young children with high caries experience, where treatment was mostly possible using advanced behavior management.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Fixed space maintainers had a significantly lower failure rate than their removable counterpart. However, both require continual repairs, preservation, or even replacement till the eruption of the permanent tooth.</p>","PeriodicalId":20831,"journal":{"name":"Quintessence international","volume":"0 0","pages":"304-312"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Success rates and failures of fixed and removable space maintainers after the premature loss of primary molars.\",\"authors\":\"Maria Abdin, Eilaf Ahmed, Rakan Hamad, Christian Splieth, Julian Schmoeckel\",\"doi\":\"10.3290/j.qi.b4984249\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The evidence base for the use of space maintainers is relatively sparce despite being used for decades after the premature loss of primary molars. This study aims to increase the dental evidence base via investigating retrospectively the success rates of prefabricated fixed and removable space maintainers inserted from 2019 to 2021 and followed up until February 2023 at a specialized university clinic and to identify reasons for any reported minor and major failure. The authors hypothesized that there is no significant difference in failure rates between fixed and removable space maintainers inserted after the premature loss of a single primary molar per quadrant.</p><p><strong>Method and materials: </strong>Patients' digital records were searched yielding 645 space maintainers. After the application of inclusion criteria, 157 (67%) fixed prefabricated space maintainers in 112 children and 77 (33%) removable space maintainers in 61 children were analyzed for an average of 18.4 ± 9.5 months.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Kaplan-Meier survival analysis with Mantel-Cox statistics showed an overall cumulative survival time of 31.6 months (SE = 1.15, 95% CI = 29.4 to 33.9). Major failure occurred significantly more in removable maintainers (n = 40/67, 59.7%), mostly due to loss of the appliance, compared to fixed space maintainers (n = 27/67, 40.3%; P < .001). The present study indicates that space maintainers were mainly placed in young children with high caries experience, where treatment was mostly possible using advanced behavior management.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Fixed space maintainers had a significantly lower failure rate than their removable counterpart. However, both require continual repairs, preservation, or even replacement till the eruption of the permanent tooth.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":20831,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Quintessence international\",\"volume\":\"0 0\",\"pages\":\"304-312\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-04-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Quintessence international\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3290/j.qi.b4984249\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Quintessence international","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3290/j.qi.b4984249","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

尽管在初级臼齿过早脱落后使用间隙保持器(SMs)已有数十年之久,但其使用的证据基础相对匮乏。因此,本研究旨在通过回顾性调查一家大学专科诊所在 2019 年至 2021 年期间植入预制固定和可移动间隙保持器的成功率,并随访至 2023 年 2 月,从而增加牙科的证据基础,并找出任何报告的轻微和重大失败的原因。作者假设,在每个象限过早丧失一颗主臼齿后安装的固定式和活动式间隙保持器在失败率上没有显著差异。作者搜索了患者的数字记录,共获得 645 个间隙保持器。根据纳入标准,对112名儿童的157颗(67%)预制固定义齿和61名儿童的77颗(33%)可摘义齿进行了平均18.4个月(±9.5)的分析。采用曼特尔-考克斯统计法进行的卡普兰-米尔生存分析显示,总体累积生存时间为 31.6 个月(SE=1.15,95% CI=29.4-33.9)。与固定间隙义齿维护者(n=27/67,40.3%;P<0.05)相比,可摘义齿维护者(n=40/67,59.7%)的主要失败原因是义齿脱落,而固定间隙义齿维护者(n=27/67,40.3%;P<0.05)的主要失败原因是义齿脱落。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Success rates and failures of fixed and removable space maintainers after the premature loss of primary molars.

Objective: The evidence base for the use of space maintainers is relatively sparce despite being used for decades after the premature loss of primary molars. This study aims to increase the dental evidence base via investigating retrospectively the success rates of prefabricated fixed and removable space maintainers inserted from 2019 to 2021 and followed up until February 2023 at a specialized university clinic and to identify reasons for any reported minor and major failure. The authors hypothesized that there is no significant difference in failure rates between fixed and removable space maintainers inserted after the premature loss of a single primary molar per quadrant.

Method and materials: Patients' digital records were searched yielding 645 space maintainers. After the application of inclusion criteria, 157 (67%) fixed prefabricated space maintainers in 112 children and 77 (33%) removable space maintainers in 61 children were analyzed for an average of 18.4 ± 9.5 months.

Results: Kaplan-Meier survival analysis with Mantel-Cox statistics showed an overall cumulative survival time of 31.6 months (SE = 1.15, 95% CI = 29.4 to 33.9). Major failure occurred significantly more in removable maintainers (n = 40/67, 59.7%), mostly due to loss of the appliance, compared to fixed space maintainers (n = 27/67, 40.3%; P < .001). The present study indicates that space maintainers were mainly placed in young children with high caries experience, where treatment was mostly possible using advanced behavior management.

Conclusions: Fixed space maintainers had a significantly lower failure rate than their removable counterpart. However, both require continual repairs, preservation, or even replacement till the eruption of the permanent tooth.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Quintessence international
Quintessence international 医学-牙科与口腔外科
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
5.30%
发文量
11
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: QI has a new contemporary design but continues its time-honored tradition of serving the needs of the general practitioner with clinically relevant articles that are scientifically based. Dr Eli Eliav and his editorial board are dedicated to practitioners worldwide through the presentation of high-level research, useful clinical procedures, and educational short case reports and clinical notes. Rigorous but timely manuscript review is the first order of business in their quest to publish a high-quality selection of articles in the multiple specialties and disciplines that encompass dentistry.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信