住院药物使用治疗中的认知矫正:阶梯式随机试验

IF 1.7 3区 心理学 Q4 NEUROSCIENCES
Neuropsychological Rehabilitation Pub Date : 2024-12-01 Epub Date: 2024-02-15 DOI:10.1080/09602011.2024.2314879
Talia Nardo, Jamie Berry, Daniel Barker, Hassan Assareh, Jo Lunn, Antoinette Sedwell, Jennifer Batchelor, Anthony Shakeshaft, Peter J Kelly, Pooria Sarrami, Skye Russell, Megan James
{"title":"住院药物使用治疗中的认知矫正:阶梯式随机试验","authors":"Talia Nardo, Jamie Berry, Daniel Barker, Hassan Assareh, Jo Lunn, Antoinette Sedwell, Jennifer Batchelor, Anthony Shakeshaft, Peter J Kelly, Pooria Sarrami, Skye Russell, Megan James","doi":"10.1080/09602011.2024.2314879","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>ABSTRACT</b>Executive dysfunction is common in individuals with substance use disorder (SUD) and presents a barrier to treatment engagement. The study aimed to investigate the effectiveness of cognitive remediation (CR) for improving executive functioning and treatment retention in patients with SUD, using a stepped-wedge cluster randomized controlled trial. The sample included 527 adults enrolled across ten residential SUD treatment providers in NSW, Australia. The intervention consisted of 12 hours of CR delivered over six weeks in a group format. The comparator was treatment-as-usual (TAU). Primary outcomes included self-reported executive functioning and proportion of treatment completed (PoTC), measured as the number of days in treatment divided by the planned treatment duration. Intention-to-treat analysis did not find significant differences for self-reported executive functioning (mean difference = -2.49, 95%CI [-5.07, 0.09], <i>p</i> = .059) or PoTC (adjusted mean ratio = 1.09, 95%CI [0.88, 1.36], <i>p</i> = .442). Due to high dropout from the intention-to-treat sample (56%) a post-hoc analysis was conducted using a per-protocol approach, in which CR was associated with improved self-reported executive functioning (mean difference = -3.33, 95%CI [-6.10, -0.57], <i>p</i> = .019) and improved likelihood of treatment graduation (adjusted odds ratio = 2.43, 95%CI [1.43, 4.11], <i>p</i> < .001). More research is required to develop a CR approach that results in service-wide treatment effectiveness.</p>","PeriodicalId":54729,"journal":{"name":"Neuropsychological Rehabilitation","volume":" ","pages":"1378-1403"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Cognitive remediation in residential substance use treatment: A randomized stepped-wedge trial.\",\"authors\":\"Talia Nardo, Jamie Berry, Daniel Barker, Hassan Assareh, Jo Lunn, Antoinette Sedwell, Jennifer Batchelor, Anthony Shakeshaft, Peter J Kelly, Pooria Sarrami, Skye Russell, Megan James\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/09602011.2024.2314879\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p><b>ABSTRACT</b>Executive dysfunction is common in individuals with substance use disorder (SUD) and presents a barrier to treatment engagement. The study aimed to investigate the effectiveness of cognitive remediation (CR) for improving executive functioning and treatment retention in patients with SUD, using a stepped-wedge cluster randomized controlled trial. The sample included 527 adults enrolled across ten residential SUD treatment providers in NSW, Australia. The intervention consisted of 12 hours of CR delivered over six weeks in a group format. The comparator was treatment-as-usual (TAU). Primary outcomes included self-reported executive functioning and proportion of treatment completed (PoTC), measured as the number of days in treatment divided by the planned treatment duration. Intention-to-treat analysis did not find significant differences for self-reported executive functioning (mean difference = -2.49, 95%CI [-5.07, 0.09], <i>p</i> = .059) or PoTC (adjusted mean ratio = 1.09, 95%CI [0.88, 1.36], <i>p</i> = .442). Due to high dropout from the intention-to-treat sample (56%) a post-hoc analysis was conducted using a per-protocol approach, in which CR was associated with improved self-reported executive functioning (mean difference = -3.33, 95%CI [-6.10, -0.57], <i>p</i> = .019) and improved likelihood of treatment graduation (adjusted odds ratio = 2.43, 95%CI [1.43, 4.11], <i>p</i> < .001). More research is required to develop a CR approach that results in service-wide treatment effectiveness.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":54729,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Neuropsychological Rehabilitation\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1378-1403\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Neuropsychological Rehabilitation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/09602011.2024.2314879\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/2/15 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"NEUROSCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neuropsychological Rehabilitation","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/09602011.2024.2314879","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/2/15 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

摘要执行功能障碍在药物使用障碍(SUD)患者中很常见,是参与治疗的一个障碍。本研究采用阶梯式群组随机对照试验,旨在调查认知矫正(CR)对改善药物滥用障碍患者的执行功能和治疗保持率的有效性。样本包括在澳大利亚新南威尔士州十家药物滥用住院治疗机构接受治疗的 527 名成人。干预措施包括在六周内以小组形式进行 12 小时的 CR 治疗。对照组为常规治疗(TAU)。主要结果包括自我报告的执行功能和完成治疗的比例(PoTC),以治疗天数除以计划治疗时间来衡量。意向治疗分析未发现自我报告的执行功能(平均差异 = -2.49,95%CI [-5.07, 0.09],p = .059)或 PoTC(调整后平均比率 = 1.09,95%CI [0.88, 1.36],p = .442)有显著差异。由于意向治疗样本的高辍学率(56%),我们采用按协议方法进行了事后分析,结果显示 CR 与自我报告的执行功能改善有关(平均差 = -3.33,95%CI [-6.10, -0.57],p = .019),与治疗毕业的可能性改善有关(调整后的几率比 = 2.43,95%CI [1.43, 4.11],p = .059)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Cognitive remediation in residential substance use treatment: A randomized stepped-wedge trial.

ABSTRACTExecutive dysfunction is common in individuals with substance use disorder (SUD) and presents a barrier to treatment engagement. The study aimed to investigate the effectiveness of cognitive remediation (CR) for improving executive functioning and treatment retention in patients with SUD, using a stepped-wedge cluster randomized controlled trial. The sample included 527 adults enrolled across ten residential SUD treatment providers in NSW, Australia. The intervention consisted of 12 hours of CR delivered over six weeks in a group format. The comparator was treatment-as-usual (TAU). Primary outcomes included self-reported executive functioning and proportion of treatment completed (PoTC), measured as the number of days in treatment divided by the planned treatment duration. Intention-to-treat analysis did not find significant differences for self-reported executive functioning (mean difference = -2.49, 95%CI [-5.07, 0.09], p = .059) or PoTC (adjusted mean ratio = 1.09, 95%CI [0.88, 1.36], p = .442). Due to high dropout from the intention-to-treat sample (56%) a post-hoc analysis was conducted using a per-protocol approach, in which CR was associated with improved self-reported executive functioning (mean difference = -3.33, 95%CI [-6.10, -0.57], p = .019) and improved likelihood of treatment graduation (adjusted odds ratio = 2.43, 95%CI [1.43, 4.11], p < .001). More research is required to develop a CR approach that results in service-wide treatment effectiveness.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Neuropsychological Rehabilitation
Neuropsychological Rehabilitation 医学-神经科学
CiteScore
6.30
自引率
7.40%
发文量
78
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Neuropsychological Rehabilitation publishes human experimental and clinical research related to rehabilitation, recovery of function, and brain plasticity. The journal is aimed at clinicians who wish to inform their practice in the light of the latest scientific research; at researchers in neurorehabilitation; and finally at researchers in cognitive neuroscience and related fields interested in the mechanisms of recovery and rehabilitation. Papers on neuropsychological assessment will be considered, and special topic reviews (2500-5000 words) addressing specific key questions in rehabilitation, recovery and brain plasticity will also be welcomed. The latter will enter a fast-track refereeing process.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信