医疗保健专业人员教练计划的实施--障碍与促进因素回顾。

IF 1.9 4区 医学 Q3 HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES
E. J. Jansen, K. Czabanowska, A. P. J. de Pagter, R. J. de Koeijer
{"title":"医疗保健专业人员教练计划的实施--障碍与促进因素回顾。","authors":"E. J. Jansen,&nbsp;K. Czabanowska,&nbsp;A. P. J. de Pagter,&nbsp;R. J. de Koeijer","doi":"10.1002/hpm.3761","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>The European Union faces severe and worsening personnel shortages in healthcare. Coaching has emerged as a human-centred strategy to enhance sustainable employment and retention. While the number of efficacy studies on coaching continues to grow, knowledge about the barriers and facilitators to implementing coaching interventions among healthcare professionals (HCPs) remains scarce.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Objectives</h3>\n \n <p>This systematic review aimed to describe common barriers and facilitators to the implementation of coaching interventions for HCPs.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>In April 2023, five databases were searched for eligible articles. Barriers and facilitators were systematically identified and mapped onto the constructs of the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR). Directed content analysis yielded thematic areas and a reporting frequency.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>A total of thirty (<i>n</i> = 30) studies were included in this review, representing twenty-five (<i>n</i> = 25) distinct coaching programmes. Implementation determinants were clustered under two CFIR domains: the <i>Inner Setting</i> (8 facilitators, 5 barriers) and <i>Implementation Process</i> (6 facilitators, 1 barrier). Barriers included (i) limited organisational capacity, (ii) lack of psychological safety, (iii) competing work demands, and (iv) insufficient leadership buy-in, while facilitators were the (i) allocation of protected time for participants and coaches, (ii) promotion through opinion leaders, (iii) embeddedness in existing Continuous Professional Development programmes, and (iv) programme co-creation.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>The findings of this study provide practical insights to guide the future implementation of coaching interventions at an organisational level. In particular, the identified barriers and facilitators suggest, for optimal efficacy and sustainment, coaching interventions must be implemented within a safe, supportive organisational climate.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":47637,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Health Planning and Management","volume":"39 3","pages":"860-878"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/hpm.3761","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Implementing coaching programmes for healthcare professionals—A review of the barriers and facilitators\",\"authors\":\"E. J. Jansen,&nbsp;K. Czabanowska,&nbsp;A. P. J. de Pagter,&nbsp;R. J. de Koeijer\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/hpm.3761\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Background</h3>\\n \\n <p>The European Union faces severe and worsening personnel shortages in healthcare. Coaching has emerged as a human-centred strategy to enhance sustainable employment and retention. While the number of efficacy studies on coaching continues to grow, knowledge about the barriers and facilitators to implementing coaching interventions among healthcare professionals (HCPs) remains scarce.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Objectives</h3>\\n \\n <p>This systematic review aimed to describe common barriers and facilitators to the implementation of coaching interventions for HCPs.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Methods</h3>\\n \\n <p>In April 2023, five databases were searched for eligible articles. Barriers and facilitators were systematically identified and mapped onto the constructs of the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR). Directed content analysis yielded thematic areas and a reporting frequency.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Results</h3>\\n \\n <p>A total of thirty (<i>n</i> = 30) studies were included in this review, representing twenty-five (<i>n</i> = 25) distinct coaching programmes. Implementation determinants were clustered under two CFIR domains: the <i>Inner Setting</i> (8 facilitators, 5 barriers) and <i>Implementation Process</i> (6 facilitators, 1 barrier). Barriers included (i) limited organisational capacity, (ii) lack of psychological safety, (iii) competing work demands, and (iv) insufficient leadership buy-in, while facilitators were the (i) allocation of protected time for participants and coaches, (ii) promotion through opinion leaders, (iii) embeddedness in existing Continuous Professional Development programmes, and (iv) programme co-creation.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\\n \\n <p>The findings of this study provide practical insights to guide the future implementation of coaching interventions at an organisational level. In particular, the identified barriers and facilitators suggest, for optimal efficacy and sustainment, coaching interventions must be implemented within a safe, supportive organisational climate.</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":47637,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Health Planning and Management\",\"volume\":\"39 3\",\"pages\":\"860-878\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-02-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/hpm.3761\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Health Planning and Management\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/hpm.3761\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Health Planning and Management","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/hpm.3761","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:欧盟面临着严重且日益恶化的医疗保健人员短缺问题。辅导已成为一种以人为本的策略,可促进可持续就业和留住人才。虽然有关教练的有效性研究数量不断增加,但有关在医疗保健专业人员(HCPs)中实施教练干预的障碍和促进因素的知识仍然很少:本系统综述旨在描述针对医护人员实施辅导干预的常见障碍和促进因素:2023 年 4 月,我们在五个数据库中搜索了符合条件的文章。系统地识别了障碍和促进因素,并将其映射到实施研究综合框架(CFIR)的构架上。定向内容分析得出了主题领域和报告频率:共有 30 (n = 30) 项研究被纳入本综述,代表了 25 (n = 25) 个不同的辅导计划。实施的决定因素被归入两个 CFIR 领域:内部环境(8 个促进因素,5 个障碍)和实施过程(6 个促进因素,1 个障碍)。障碍包括:(i) 组织能力有限;(ii) 缺乏心理安全感;(iii) 工作需求相互竞争;(iv) 领导层支持不足;而促进因素则包括:(i) 为参与者和教练分配受保护的时间;(ii) 通过舆论领袖进行宣传;(iii) 嵌入现有的持续专业发展计划;(iv) 共同创建计划:本研究的结果为指导今后在组织层面实施教练干预措施提供了实用的见解。特别是,所发现的障碍和促进因素表明,为了达到最佳效果和持续性,必须在安全、支持性的组织氛围中实施教练干预。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Implementing coaching programmes for healthcare professionals—A review of the barriers and facilitators

Implementing coaching programmes for healthcare professionals—A review of the barriers and facilitators

Background

The European Union faces severe and worsening personnel shortages in healthcare. Coaching has emerged as a human-centred strategy to enhance sustainable employment and retention. While the number of efficacy studies on coaching continues to grow, knowledge about the barriers and facilitators to implementing coaching interventions among healthcare professionals (HCPs) remains scarce.

Objectives

This systematic review aimed to describe common barriers and facilitators to the implementation of coaching interventions for HCPs.

Methods

In April 2023, five databases were searched for eligible articles. Barriers and facilitators were systematically identified and mapped onto the constructs of the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR). Directed content analysis yielded thematic areas and a reporting frequency.

Results

A total of thirty (n = 30) studies were included in this review, representing twenty-five (n = 25) distinct coaching programmes. Implementation determinants were clustered under two CFIR domains: the Inner Setting (8 facilitators, 5 barriers) and Implementation Process (6 facilitators, 1 barrier). Barriers included (i) limited organisational capacity, (ii) lack of psychological safety, (iii) competing work demands, and (iv) insufficient leadership buy-in, while facilitators were the (i) allocation of protected time for participants and coaches, (ii) promotion through opinion leaders, (iii) embeddedness in existing Continuous Professional Development programmes, and (iv) programme co-creation.

Conclusion

The findings of this study provide practical insights to guide the future implementation of coaching interventions at an organisational level. In particular, the identified barriers and facilitators suggest, for optimal efficacy and sustainment, coaching interventions must be implemented within a safe, supportive organisational climate.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
3.70%
发文量
197
期刊介绍: Policy making and implementation, planning and management are widely recognized as central to effective health systems and services and to better health. Globalization, and the economic circumstances facing groups of countries worldwide, meanwhile present a great challenge for health planning and management. The aim of this quarterly journal is to offer a forum for publications which direct attention to major issues in health policy, planning and management. The intention is to maintain a balance between theory and practice, from a variety of disciplines, fields and perspectives. The Journal is explicitly international and multidisciplinary in scope and appeal: articles about policy, planning and management in countries at various stages of political, social, cultural and economic development are welcomed, as are those directed at the different levels (national, regional, local) of the health sector. Manuscripts are invited from a spectrum of different disciplines e.g., (the social sciences, management and medicine) as long as they advance our knowledge and understanding of the health sector. The Journal is therefore global, and eclectic.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信