甘氨酸和赤藓糖醇处理后不同氧化锆种植体表面的湿润性

Lauren Mistretta, Rafael Delgado-Ruiz, Georgios E Romanos
{"title":"甘氨酸和赤藓糖醇处理后不同氧化锆种植体表面的湿润性","authors":"Lauren Mistretta, Rafael Delgado-Ruiz, Georgios E Romanos","doi":"10.11607/jomi.10862","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To investigate whether the wettability of two zirconia (Zr) implant disk surfaces is affected by glycine and erythritol air polishing using the following wetting solutions as test mediums: saline, bovine serum albumin (BSA), bovine thrombin, and bovine artificial blood.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>The two types of Zr disks used were SDS (Swiss Dental Solutions; n = 6) and Patent (Zircon Medical AG; n = 6). Surface parameters (Sa, Sz, Sdr, Ssk, Sku, and Spd) were measured to determine their initial surface roughness. Air polishing was completed using glycine or erythritol powders using the AIRFLOW PERIO device (EMS Dental). The wettability of the disk surfaces was evaluated by the contact angle analysis applied to the treated and untreated disks using four wetting solutions, including saline, BSA, bovine thrombin, and bovine artificial blood. In total, 720 contact angle measurements were completed with n = 30 per group. Statistical analysis was performed using one-way ANOVA and the post-hoc Tukey HSD test.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The results indicate that SDS has a greater wettability than Patent before and after air polishing. The wettability of surfaces treated with glycine was hydrophobic in some cases. Erythritol increased the surface wettability of Zr disks more than glycine. BSA and bovine artificial blood had lower contact angles than saline and bovine thrombin for both types of untreated disks.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The initial wettability of Zr disks differs between manufacturers, and air polishing with erythritol powder increases the wettability of Zr implant disks for saline, bovine serum, bovine thrombin, and bovine artificial blood.</p>","PeriodicalId":94230,"journal":{"name":"The International journal of oral & maxillofacial implants","volume":"0 0","pages":"837-844"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Wettability of Different Zirconia Implant Surfaces after Glycine and Erythritol Treatment.\",\"authors\":\"Lauren Mistretta, Rafael Delgado-Ruiz, Georgios E Romanos\",\"doi\":\"10.11607/jomi.10862\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To investigate whether the wettability of two zirconia (Zr) implant disk surfaces is affected by glycine and erythritol air polishing using the following wetting solutions as test mediums: saline, bovine serum albumin (BSA), bovine thrombin, and bovine artificial blood.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>The two types of Zr disks used were SDS (Swiss Dental Solutions; n = 6) and Patent (Zircon Medical AG; n = 6). Surface parameters (Sa, Sz, Sdr, Ssk, Sku, and Spd) were measured to determine their initial surface roughness. Air polishing was completed using glycine or erythritol powders using the AIRFLOW PERIO device (EMS Dental). The wettability of the disk surfaces was evaluated by the contact angle analysis applied to the treated and untreated disks using four wetting solutions, including saline, BSA, bovine thrombin, and bovine artificial blood. In total, 720 contact angle measurements were completed with n = 30 per group. Statistical analysis was performed using one-way ANOVA and the post-hoc Tukey HSD test.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The results indicate that SDS has a greater wettability than Patent before and after air polishing. The wettability of surfaces treated with glycine was hydrophobic in some cases. Erythritol increased the surface wettability of Zr disks more than glycine. BSA and bovine artificial blood had lower contact angles than saline and bovine thrombin for both types of untreated disks.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The initial wettability of Zr disks differs between manufacturers, and air polishing with erythritol powder increases the wettability of Zr implant disks for saline, bovine serum, bovine thrombin, and bovine artificial blood.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":94230,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The International journal of oral & maxillofacial implants\",\"volume\":\"0 0\",\"pages\":\"837-844\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The International journal of oral & maxillofacial implants\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.11607/jomi.10862\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The International journal of oral & maxillofacial implants","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.11607/jomi.10862","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:本体外研究旨在以生理盐水、牛血清白蛋白、牛凝血酶和牛人工血为测试介质,探讨甘氨酸和赤藓糖醇气抛光是否会影响两种氧化锆种植体盘表面的润湿性:氧化锆盘由两家种植公司提供:SDS.(Swiss Dental Solutions, Plymouth, MA, USA) (n=6) 和 Patent.(Zircon Medical AG, Altendorf, Switzerland) (n=6).测量表面参数(Sa、Sz、Sdr、Ssk、Sku 和 Spd)以确定其初始表面粗糙度。使用 AIRFLOW.PERIO 设备(由 Electro Medical Systems (EMS) 制造)完成。通过使用四种润湿溶液(生理盐水、牛血清白蛋白 (BSA)、牛凝血酶和牛人工血)对处理过和未处理过的磁盘进行接触角分析,评估磁盘表面的润湿性。总共完成了 720 次接触角测量,每组 n=30 次。统计分析采用单因素方差分析和事后 Tukey HSD 检验:结果表明,在空气抛光前后,SDS.比 Patent.具有更高的润湿性。用甘氨酸处理过的表面在某些情况下具有疏水性。与甘氨酸相比,赤藓糖醇增加了氧化锆盘的表面润湿性。对于未经处理的氧化锆盘,BSA 和牛人工血的接触角均低于生理盐水和牛凝血酶:结论:不同制造商生产的氧化锆盘的初始润湿性不同,使用赤藓糖醇粉末进行空气抛光可提高氧化锆植入盘对生理盐水、牛血清、牛凝血酶和牛人工血的润湿性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Wettability of Different Zirconia Implant Surfaces after Glycine and Erythritol Treatment.

Purpose: To investigate whether the wettability of two zirconia (Zr) implant disk surfaces is affected by glycine and erythritol air polishing using the following wetting solutions as test mediums: saline, bovine serum albumin (BSA), bovine thrombin, and bovine artificial blood.

Materials and methods: The two types of Zr disks used were SDS (Swiss Dental Solutions; n = 6) and Patent (Zircon Medical AG; n = 6). Surface parameters (Sa, Sz, Sdr, Ssk, Sku, and Spd) were measured to determine their initial surface roughness. Air polishing was completed using glycine or erythritol powders using the AIRFLOW PERIO device (EMS Dental). The wettability of the disk surfaces was evaluated by the contact angle analysis applied to the treated and untreated disks using four wetting solutions, including saline, BSA, bovine thrombin, and bovine artificial blood. In total, 720 contact angle measurements were completed with n = 30 per group. Statistical analysis was performed using one-way ANOVA and the post-hoc Tukey HSD test.

Results: The results indicate that SDS has a greater wettability than Patent before and after air polishing. The wettability of surfaces treated with glycine was hydrophobic in some cases. Erythritol increased the surface wettability of Zr disks more than glycine. BSA and bovine artificial blood had lower contact angles than saline and bovine thrombin for both types of untreated disks.

Conclusions: The initial wettability of Zr disks differs between manufacturers, and air polishing with erythritol powder increases the wettability of Zr implant disks for saline, bovine serum, bovine thrombin, and bovine artificial blood.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信