处理具有交叉分类结构的项目级数据的方法:以学生对教学的评价为例。

IF 5.3 3区 心理学 Q1 MATHEMATICS, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS
Multivariate Behavioral Research Pub Date : 2024-05-01 Epub Date: 2024-02-13 DOI:10.1080/00273171.2023.2288589
Sijia Huang
{"title":"处理具有交叉分类结构的项目级数据的方法:以学生对教学的评价为例。","authors":"Sijia Huang","doi":"10.1080/00273171.2023.2288589","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Student evaluation of teaching (SET) questionnaires are ubiquitously applied in higher education institutions in North America for both formative and summative purposes. Data collected from SET questionnaires are usually item-level data with cross-classified structure, which are characterized by multivariate categorical outcomes (i.e., multiple Likert-type items in the questionnaires) and cross-classified structure (i.e., non-nested students and instructors). Recently, a new approach, namely the cross-classified IRT model, was proposed for appropriately handling SET data. To inform researchers in higher education, in this article, the cross-classified IRT model, along with three existing approaches applied in SET studies, including the cross-classified random effects model (CCREM), the multilevel item response theory (MLIRT) model, and a two-step integrated strategy, was reviewed. The strengths and weaknesses of each of the four approaches were also discussed. Additionally, the new and existing approaches were compared through an empirical data analysis and a preliminary simulation study. This article concluded by providing general suggestions to researchers for analyzing SET data and discussing limitations and future research directions.</p>","PeriodicalId":53155,"journal":{"name":"Multivariate Behavioral Research","volume":" ","pages":"523-542"},"PeriodicalIF":5.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Approaches to Item-Level Data with Cross-Classified Structure: An Illustration with Student Evaluation of Teaching.\",\"authors\":\"Sijia Huang\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/00273171.2023.2288589\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Student evaluation of teaching (SET) questionnaires are ubiquitously applied in higher education institutions in North America for both formative and summative purposes. Data collected from SET questionnaires are usually item-level data with cross-classified structure, which are characterized by multivariate categorical outcomes (i.e., multiple Likert-type items in the questionnaires) and cross-classified structure (i.e., non-nested students and instructors). Recently, a new approach, namely the cross-classified IRT model, was proposed for appropriately handling SET data. To inform researchers in higher education, in this article, the cross-classified IRT model, along with three existing approaches applied in SET studies, including the cross-classified random effects model (CCREM), the multilevel item response theory (MLIRT) model, and a two-step integrated strategy, was reviewed. The strengths and weaknesses of each of the four approaches were also discussed. Additionally, the new and existing approaches were compared through an empirical data analysis and a preliminary simulation study. This article concluded by providing general suggestions to researchers for analyzing SET data and discussing limitations and future research directions.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":53155,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Multivariate Behavioral Research\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"523-542\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-05-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Multivariate Behavioral Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/00273171.2023.2288589\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/2/13 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"MATHEMATICS, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Multivariate Behavioral Research","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/00273171.2023.2288589","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/2/13 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MATHEMATICS, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在北美的高等教育机构中,学生教学评价(SET)问卷被广泛应用于形成性和总结性教学评价。从 SET 问卷中收集的数据通常是具有交叉分类结构的项目级数据,其特点是多变量分类结果(即问卷中有多个李克特类型的项目)和交叉分类结构(即非嵌套的学生和教师)。最近,有人提出了一种新方法,即交叉分类 IRT 模型,用于适当处理 SET 数据。为了给高等教育研究人员提供参考,本文回顾了交叉分类 IRT 模型以及应用于 SET 研究的三种现有方法,包括交叉分类随机效应模型 (CCREM)、多层次项目反应理论 (MLIRT) 模型和两步综合策略。还讨论了这四种方法各自的优缺点。此外,还通过实证数据分析和初步模拟研究对新方法和现有方法进行了比较。文章最后为研究人员提供了分析 SET 数据的一般建议,并讨论了局限性和未来研究方向。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Approaches to Item-Level Data with Cross-Classified Structure: An Illustration with Student Evaluation of Teaching.

Student evaluation of teaching (SET) questionnaires are ubiquitously applied in higher education institutions in North America for both formative and summative purposes. Data collected from SET questionnaires are usually item-level data with cross-classified structure, which are characterized by multivariate categorical outcomes (i.e., multiple Likert-type items in the questionnaires) and cross-classified structure (i.e., non-nested students and instructors). Recently, a new approach, namely the cross-classified IRT model, was proposed for appropriately handling SET data. To inform researchers in higher education, in this article, the cross-classified IRT model, along with three existing approaches applied in SET studies, including the cross-classified random effects model (CCREM), the multilevel item response theory (MLIRT) model, and a two-step integrated strategy, was reviewed. The strengths and weaknesses of each of the four approaches were also discussed. Additionally, the new and existing approaches were compared through an empirical data analysis and a preliminary simulation study. This article concluded by providing general suggestions to researchers for analyzing SET data and discussing limitations and future research directions.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Multivariate Behavioral Research
Multivariate Behavioral Research 数学-数学跨学科应用
CiteScore
7.60
自引率
2.60%
发文量
49
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Multivariate Behavioral Research (MBR) publishes a variety of substantive, methodological, and theoretical articles in all areas of the social and behavioral sciences. Most MBR articles fall into one of two categories. Substantive articles report on applications of sophisticated multivariate research methods to study topics of substantive interest in personality, health, intelligence, industrial/organizational, and other behavioral science areas. Methodological articles present and/or evaluate new developments in multivariate methods, or address methodological issues in current research. We also encourage submission of integrative articles related to pedagogy involving multivariate research methods, and to historical treatments of interest and relevance to multivariate research methods.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信