单侧空间疏忽可能无法通过基于表现的功能疏忽评估检测出来。

IF 2.1 4区 医学 Q1 REHABILITATION
Emily S Grattan, Brice Hounshel Smith, Katie Mullen, Michelle L Woodbury
{"title":"单侧空间疏忽可能无法通过基于表现的功能疏忽评估检测出来。","authors":"Emily S Grattan, Brice Hounshel Smith, Katie Mullen, Michelle L Woodbury","doi":"10.5014/ajot.2024.050497","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Importance: </strong>Unilateral spatial neglect (neglect) poststroke is disabling. It is critical that people with neglect are identified so that treatment can be provided to maximize independence. However, there is some evidence to suggest that existing assessments may not adequately measure neglect. It is unclear whether assessments also fail to identify people with neglect entirely.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To determine whether there are stroke survivors who self-report neglect symptoms that are not detected by therapist-rated assessments and to compare self-report and therapist-ratings.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Cross-sectional study.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>U.S. university research center.</p><p><strong>Participants: </strong>Unilateral stroke survivors (N = 133).</p><p><strong>Intervention: </strong>Not applicable.</p><p><strong>Outcomes and measures: </strong>The Catherine Bergego Scale (CBS) was administered to participants and scored by a trained occupational therapist. The parallel self-evaluation anosognosia form was also administered to participants to self-report and rate neglect symptoms.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Forty-eight participants (36.1%) were classified as without neglect on the basis of therapist-rated total CBS scores, yet 30 (62.5%) of these 48 participants reported symptoms of neglect on the CBS self-evaluation anosognosia form. There was a significant difference (p < .001) between therapist-rated and self-rated total CBS scores.</p><p><strong>Conclusions and relevance: </strong>Our results indicate that many stroke survivors report some level of disability associated with neglect yet do not meet the criteria to be classified as having neglect according to a commonly used therapist-rated performance-based measure. Plain-Language Summary: The findings of this study contribute to the evidence that existing assessments used by occupational therapists to measure performance-based neglect may not always detect neglect symptoms comprehensively in people poststroke. The finding also suggest that we may be missing neglect symptoms entirely. Occupational therapists should consider using various methods to assess for neglect, including patient self-report and comprehensive occupational profiles. Clinicians should also thoroughly screen all clients with stroke for neglect, regardless of lesion location.</p>","PeriodicalId":48317,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Occupational Therapy","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11017738/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Unilateral Spatial Neglect May Not Be Detected by Performance-Based Functional Neglect Assessment.\",\"authors\":\"Emily S Grattan, Brice Hounshel Smith, Katie Mullen, Michelle L Woodbury\",\"doi\":\"10.5014/ajot.2024.050497\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Importance: </strong>Unilateral spatial neglect (neglect) poststroke is disabling. It is critical that people with neglect are identified so that treatment can be provided to maximize independence. However, there is some evidence to suggest that existing assessments may not adequately measure neglect. It is unclear whether assessments also fail to identify people with neglect entirely.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To determine whether there are stroke survivors who self-report neglect symptoms that are not detected by therapist-rated assessments and to compare self-report and therapist-ratings.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Cross-sectional study.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>U.S. university research center.</p><p><strong>Participants: </strong>Unilateral stroke survivors (N = 133).</p><p><strong>Intervention: </strong>Not applicable.</p><p><strong>Outcomes and measures: </strong>The Catherine Bergego Scale (CBS) was administered to participants and scored by a trained occupational therapist. The parallel self-evaluation anosognosia form was also administered to participants to self-report and rate neglect symptoms.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Forty-eight participants (36.1%) were classified as without neglect on the basis of therapist-rated total CBS scores, yet 30 (62.5%) of these 48 participants reported symptoms of neglect on the CBS self-evaluation anosognosia form. There was a significant difference (p < .001) between therapist-rated and self-rated total CBS scores.</p><p><strong>Conclusions and relevance: </strong>Our results indicate that many stroke survivors report some level of disability associated with neglect yet do not meet the criteria to be classified as having neglect according to a commonly used therapist-rated performance-based measure. Plain-Language Summary: The findings of this study contribute to the evidence that existing assessments used by occupational therapists to measure performance-based neglect may not always detect neglect symptoms comprehensively in people poststroke. The finding also suggest that we may be missing neglect symptoms entirely. Occupational therapists should consider using various methods to assess for neglect, including patient self-report and comprehensive occupational profiles. Clinicians should also thoroughly screen all clients with stroke for neglect, regardless of lesion location.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48317,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"American Journal of Occupational Therapy\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11017738/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"American Journal of Occupational Therapy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5014/ajot.2024.050497\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"REHABILITATION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Occupational Therapy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5014/ajot.2024.050497","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

重要性:中风后单侧空间忽略(忽视)会导致残疾。识别忽视患者至关重要,这样才能提供治疗,最大限度地提高患者的独立性。然而,有证据表明,现有的评估可能无法充分测量忽视。目前还不清楚评估是否也不能完全识别忽视患者:确定是否有中风幸存者自我报告的忽视症状未被治疗师评定的评估发现,并比较自我报告和治疗师评定:设计:横断面研究:参与者:单侧中风幸存者(N:干预措施:不适用:结果和测量凯瑟琳-伯格戈量表(CBS)由一名训练有素的职业治疗师对参与者进行施测和评分。同时还对参与者进行平行的自我评估认知表,以对忽视症状进行自我报告和评分:根据治疗师评定的 CBS 总分,48 名参与者(36.1%)被归类为无忽视,但这 48 名参与者中有 30 人(62.5%)在 CBS 自我评估认知表中报告了忽视症状。治疗师评定的 CBS 总分与自我评定的 CBS 总分之间存在明显差异(p < .001):我们的研究结果表明,许多中风幸存者报告了与忽视相关的某种程度的残疾,但根据常用的治疗师评分标准,他们并不符合被归类为忽视的标准。通俗摘要:本研究结果有助于证明职业治疗师用于衡量基于表现的忽视的现有评估方法可能并不总能全面检测出中风后患者的忽视症状。研究结果还表明,我们可能会完全遗漏忽视症状。职业治疗师应考虑使用各种方法来评估忽视,包括患者自我报告和综合职业档案。临床医生还应对所有中风患者进行彻底的忽视筛查,无论病变位置如何。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Unilateral Spatial Neglect May Not Be Detected by Performance-Based Functional Neglect Assessment.

Importance: Unilateral spatial neglect (neglect) poststroke is disabling. It is critical that people with neglect are identified so that treatment can be provided to maximize independence. However, there is some evidence to suggest that existing assessments may not adequately measure neglect. It is unclear whether assessments also fail to identify people with neglect entirely.

Objective: To determine whether there are stroke survivors who self-report neglect symptoms that are not detected by therapist-rated assessments and to compare self-report and therapist-ratings.

Design: Cross-sectional study.

Setting: U.S. university research center.

Participants: Unilateral stroke survivors (N = 133).

Intervention: Not applicable.

Outcomes and measures: The Catherine Bergego Scale (CBS) was administered to participants and scored by a trained occupational therapist. The parallel self-evaluation anosognosia form was also administered to participants to self-report and rate neglect symptoms.

Results: Forty-eight participants (36.1%) were classified as without neglect on the basis of therapist-rated total CBS scores, yet 30 (62.5%) of these 48 participants reported symptoms of neglect on the CBS self-evaluation anosognosia form. There was a significant difference (p < .001) between therapist-rated and self-rated total CBS scores.

Conclusions and relevance: Our results indicate that many stroke survivors report some level of disability associated with neglect yet do not meet the criteria to be classified as having neglect according to a commonly used therapist-rated performance-based measure. Plain-Language Summary: The findings of this study contribute to the evidence that existing assessments used by occupational therapists to measure performance-based neglect may not always detect neglect symptoms comprehensively in people poststroke. The finding also suggest that we may be missing neglect symptoms entirely. Occupational therapists should consider using various methods to assess for neglect, including patient self-report and comprehensive occupational profiles. Clinicians should also thoroughly screen all clients with stroke for neglect, regardless of lesion location.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.10
自引率
10.30%
发文量
406
期刊介绍: The American Journal of Occupational Therapy (AJOT) is an official publication of the American Occupational Therapy Association, Inc. and is published 6 times per year. This peer reviewed journal focuses on research, practice, and health care issues in the field of occupational therapy. AOTA members receive 6 issues of AJOT per year and have online access to archived abstracts and full-text articles. Nonmembers may view abstracts online but must purchase full-text articles.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信