{"title":"股票市场会预测公司案件中的事件和最高法院的裁决吗?","authors":"Yehuda Davis , Suresh Govindaraj , Kate Suslava","doi":"10.1016/j.gfj.2024.100946","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>This paper investigates stock market reactions to judicial events in the United States Supreme Court (SCOTUS) involving at least one public firm. Using a comprehensive dataset of >500 SCOTUS cases from 1948 to 2018, we find that the stock market reacts significantly to both the grant of <em>certiorari</em> and the announcement of the final decision. In particular, the stock market reaction to the petitioner and respondent being granted <em>certiorari</em> is significantly negative, portending general higher uncertainty ahead. Furthermore, the stock market reaction to the final decisions for winning (losing) firms is positive (negative). In addition, we find that case characteristics, such as parties involved and the type of legal issue, explain some of the cross-sectional variations in the stock returns across cases. Our tests also show that there is no prior information leakage and no stock price drift following the events.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":46907,"journal":{"name":"Global Finance Journal","volume":"60 ","pages":"Article 100946"},"PeriodicalIF":5.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Does the stock market anticipate events and supreme court decisions in corporate cases?\",\"authors\":\"Yehuda Davis , Suresh Govindaraj , Kate Suslava\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.gfj.2024.100946\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>This paper investigates stock market reactions to judicial events in the United States Supreme Court (SCOTUS) involving at least one public firm. Using a comprehensive dataset of >500 SCOTUS cases from 1948 to 2018, we find that the stock market reacts significantly to both the grant of <em>certiorari</em> and the announcement of the final decision. In particular, the stock market reaction to the petitioner and respondent being granted <em>certiorari</em> is significantly negative, portending general higher uncertainty ahead. Furthermore, the stock market reaction to the final decisions for winning (losing) firms is positive (negative). In addition, we find that case characteristics, such as parties involved and the type of legal issue, explain some of the cross-sectional variations in the stock returns across cases. Our tests also show that there is no prior information leakage and no stock price drift following the events.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":46907,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Global Finance Journal\",\"volume\":\"60 \",\"pages\":\"Article 100946\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-02-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Global Finance Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"96\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1044028324000188\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"经济学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"BUSINESS, FINANCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Global Finance Journal","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1044028324000188","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BUSINESS, FINANCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
Does the stock market anticipate events and supreme court decisions in corporate cases?
This paper investigates stock market reactions to judicial events in the United States Supreme Court (SCOTUS) involving at least one public firm. Using a comprehensive dataset of >500 SCOTUS cases from 1948 to 2018, we find that the stock market reacts significantly to both the grant of certiorari and the announcement of the final decision. In particular, the stock market reaction to the petitioner and respondent being granted certiorari is significantly negative, portending general higher uncertainty ahead. Furthermore, the stock market reaction to the final decisions for winning (losing) firms is positive (negative). In addition, we find that case characteristics, such as parties involved and the type of legal issue, explain some of the cross-sectional variations in the stock returns across cases. Our tests also show that there is no prior information leakage and no stock price drift following the events.
期刊介绍:
Global Finance Journal provides a forum for the exchange of ideas and techniques among academicians and practitioners and, thereby, advances applied research in global financial management. Global Finance Journal publishes original, creative, scholarly research that integrates theory and practice and addresses a readership in both business and academia. Articles reflecting pragmatic research are sought in areas such as financial management, investment, banking and financial services, accounting, and taxation. Global Finance Journal welcomes contributions from scholars in both the business and academic community and encourages collaborative research from this broad base worldwide.