股票市场会预测公司案件中的事件和最高法院的裁决吗?

IF 5.5 2区 经济学 Q1 BUSINESS, FINANCE
Yehuda Davis , Suresh Govindaraj , Kate Suslava
{"title":"股票市场会预测公司案件中的事件和最高法院的裁决吗?","authors":"Yehuda Davis ,&nbsp;Suresh Govindaraj ,&nbsp;Kate Suslava","doi":"10.1016/j.gfj.2024.100946","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>This paper investigates stock market reactions to judicial events in the United States Supreme Court (SCOTUS) involving at least one public firm. Using a comprehensive dataset of &gt;500 SCOTUS cases from 1948 to 2018, we find that the stock market reacts significantly to both the grant of <em>certiorari</em> and the announcement of the final decision. In particular, the stock market reaction to the petitioner and respondent being granted <em>certiorari</em> is significantly negative, portending general higher uncertainty ahead. Furthermore, the stock market reaction to the final decisions for winning (losing) firms is positive (negative). In addition, we find that case characteristics, such as parties involved and the type of legal issue, explain some of the cross-sectional variations in the stock returns across cases. Our tests also show that there is no prior information leakage and no stock price drift following the events.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":46907,"journal":{"name":"Global Finance Journal","volume":"60 ","pages":"Article 100946"},"PeriodicalIF":5.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Does the stock market anticipate events and supreme court decisions in corporate cases?\",\"authors\":\"Yehuda Davis ,&nbsp;Suresh Govindaraj ,&nbsp;Kate Suslava\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.gfj.2024.100946\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>This paper investigates stock market reactions to judicial events in the United States Supreme Court (SCOTUS) involving at least one public firm. Using a comprehensive dataset of &gt;500 SCOTUS cases from 1948 to 2018, we find that the stock market reacts significantly to both the grant of <em>certiorari</em> and the announcement of the final decision. In particular, the stock market reaction to the petitioner and respondent being granted <em>certiorari</em> is significantly negative, portending general higher uncertainty ahead. Furthermore, the stock market reaction to the final decisions for winning (losing) firms is positive (negative). In addition, we find that case characteristics, such as parties involved and the type of legal issue, explain some of the cross-sectional variations in the stock returns across cases. Our tests also show that there is no prior information leakage and no stock price drift following the events.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":46907,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Global Finance Journal\",\"volume\":\"60 \",\"pages\":\"Article 100946\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-02-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Global Finance Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"96\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1044028324000188\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"经济学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"BUSINESS, FINANCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Global Finance Journal","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1044028324000188","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BUSINESS, FINANCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文研究了股市对美国最高法院(SCOTUS)至少涉及一家上市公司的司法事件的反应。通过使用 1948 年至 2018 年的 >500 个 SCOTUS 案件的综合数据集,我们发现股票市场对批准诉讼保全和宣布最终判决都有显著反应。特别是,请愿人和答辩人获得诉讼保全的股市反应明显为负,预示着未来的不确定性普遍较高。此外,股市对胜诉(败诉)公司最终裁决的反应为正(负)。此外,我们还发现,案件特征(如涉案各方和法律问题类型)可以解释不同案件中股票回报率的部分横截面差异。我们的检验还表明,在事件发生后不存在事先信息泄露和股价漂移。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Does the stock market anticipate events and supreme court decisions in corporate cases?

This paper investigates stock market reactions to judicial events in the United States Supreme Court (SCOTUS) involving at least one public firm. Using a comprehensive dataset of >500 SCOTUS cases from 1948 to 2018, we find that the stock market reacts significantly to both the grant of certiorari and the announcement of the final decision. In particular, the stock market reaction to the petitioner and respondent being granted certiorari is significantly negative, portending general higher uncertainty ahead. Furthermore, the stock market reaction to the final decisions for winning (losing) firms is positive (negative). In addition, we find that case characteristics, such as parties involved and the type of legal issue, explain some of the cross-sectional variations in the stock returns across cases. Our tests also show that there is no prior information leakage and no stock price drift following the events.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Global Finance Journal
Global Finance Journal BUSINESS, FINANCE-
CiteScore
7.30
自引率
13.50%
发文量
106
审稿时长
53 days
期刊介绍: Global Finance Journal provides a forum for the exchange of ideas and techniques among academicians and practitioners and, thereby, advances applied research in global financial management. Global Finance Journal publishes original, creative, scholarly research that integrates theory and practice and addresses a readership in both business and academia. Articles reflecting pragmatic research are sought in areas such as financial management, investment, banking and financial services, accounting, and taxation. Global Finance Journal welcomes contributions from scholars in both the business and academic community and encourages collaborative research from this broad base worldwide.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信