利用机器学习模型开发并验证预测中老年人死亡率的实验室检测预后指数:一项前瞻性队列研究。

Chi-Hsien Huang, Yao-Hwei Fang, Shu Zhang, I-Chien Wu, Shu-Chun Chuang, Hsing-Yi Chang, Yi-Fen Tsai, Wei-Ting Tseng, Ray-Chin Wu, Yen-Tze Liu, Li-Ming Lien, Chung-Chou Juan, Chikako Tange, Rei Otsuka, Hidenori Arai, Chih-Cheng Hsu, Chao Agnes Hsiung
{"title":"利用机器学习模型开发并验证预测中老年人死亡率的实验室检测预后指数:一项前瞻性队列研究。","authors":"Chi-Hsien Huang, Yao-Hwei Fang, Shu Zhang, I-Chien Wu, Shu-Chun Chuang, Hsing-Yi Chang, Yi-Fen Tsai, Wei-Ting Tseng, Ray-Chin Wu, Yen-Tze Liu, Li-Ming Lien, Chung-Chou Juan, Chikako Tange, Rei Otsuka, Hidenori Arai, Chih-Cheng Hsu, Chao Agnes Hsiung","doi":"10.1093/gerona/glae041","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Prognostic indices can enhance personalized predictions of health burdens. However, a simple, practical, and reproducible tool is lacking for clinical use. This study aimed to develop a machine learning-based prognostic index for predicting all-cause mortality in community-dwelling older individuals.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We utilized the Healthy Aging Longitudinal Study in Taiwan (HALST) cohort, encompassing data from 5 663 participants. Over the 5-year follow-up, 447 deaths were confirmed. A machine learning-based routine blood examination prognostic index (MARBE-PI) was developed using common laboratory tests based on machine learning techniques. Participants were grouped into multiple risk categories by stratum-specific likelihood ratio analysis based on their MARBE-PI scores. The MARBE-PI was subsequently externally validated with an independent population-based cohort from Japan.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Beyond age, sex, education level, and BMI, 6 laboratory tests (low-density lipoprotein, albumin, aspartate aminotransferase, lymphocyte count, high-sensitivity C-reactive protein, and creatinine) emerged as pivotal predictors via stepwise logistic regression (LR) for 5-year mortality. The area under curves of MARBE-PI constructed by LR were 0.799 (95% confidence interval [95% CI]: 0.778-0.819) and 0.756 (95% CI: 0.694-0.814) for the internal and external validation data sets, and were 0.801 (95% CI: 0.790-0.811) and 0.809 (95% CI: 0.774-0.845) for the extended 10-year mortality in both data sets, respectively. Risk categories stratified by MARBE-PI showed a consistent dose-response association with mortality. The MARBE-PI also performed comparably with indices constructed with clinical health deficits and/or laboratory results.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The MARBE-PI is considered the most applicable measure for risk stratification in busy clinical settings. It holds potential to pinpoint older individuals at elevated mortality risk, thereby aiding clinical decision-making.</p>","PeriodicalId":94243,"journal":{"name":"The journals of gerontology. Series A, Biological sciences and medical sciences","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Develop and Validate a Prognostic Index With Laboratory Tests to Predict Mortality in Middle-Aged and Older Adults Using Machine Learning Models: A Prospective Cohort Study.\",\"authors\":\"Chi-Hsien Huang, Yao-Hwei Fang, Shu Zhang, I-Chien Wu, Shu-Chun Chuang, Hsing-Yi Chang, Yi-Fen Tsai, Wei-Ting Tseng, Ray-Chin Wu, Yen-Tze Liu, Li-Ming Lien, Chung-Chou Juan, Chikako Tange, Rei Otsuka, Hidenori Arai, Chih-Cheng Hsu, Chao Agnes Hsiung\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/gerona/glae041\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Prognostic indices can enhance personalized predictions of health burdens. However, a simple, practical, and reproducible tool is lacking for clinical use. This study aimed to develop a machine learning-based prognostic index for predicting all-cause mortality in community-dwelling older individuals.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We utilized the Healthy Aging Longitudinal Study in Taiwan (HALST) cohort, encompassing data from 5 663 participants. Over the 5-year follow-up, 447 deaths were confirmed. A machine learning-based routine blood examination prognostic index (MARBE-PI) was developed using common laboratory tests based on machine learning techniques. Participants were grouped into multiple risk categories by stratum-specific likelihood ratio analysis based on their MARBE-PI scores. The MARBE-PI was subsequently externally validated with an independent population-based cohort from Japan.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Beyond age, sex, education level, and BMI, 6 laboratory tests (low-density lipoprotein, albumin, aspartate aminotransferase, lymphocyte count, high-sensitivity C-reactive protein, and creatinine) emerged as pivotal predictors via stepwise logistic regression (LR) for 5-year mortality. The area under curves of MARBE-PI constructed by LR were 0.799 (95% confidence interval [95% CI]: 0.778-0.819) and 0.756 (95% CI: 0.694-0.814) for the internal and external validation data sets, and were 0.801 (95% CI: 0.790-0.811) and 0.809 (95% CI: 0.774-0.845) for the extended 10-year mortality in both data sets, respectively. Risk categories stratified by MARBE-PI showed a consistent dose-response association with mortality. The MARBE-PI also performed comparably with indices constructed with clinical health deficits and/or laboratory results.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The MARBE-PI is considered the most applicable measure for risk stratification in busy clinical settings. It holds potential to pinpoint older individuals at elevated mortality risk, thereby aiding clinical decision-making.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":94243,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The journals of gerontology. Series A, Biological sciences and medical sciences\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-05-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The journals of gerontology. Series A, Biological sciences and medical sciences\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/gerona/glae041\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The journals of gerontology. Series A, Biological sciences and medical sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/gerona/glae041","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:预后指数可以增强对健康负担的个性化预测。然而,临床上还缺乏一种简单、实用且可重复使用的工具。本研究旨在开发一种基于机器学习的预后指数,用于预测社区老年人的全因死亡率:方法:我们利用了台湾健康老龄化纵向研究(HALST)队列,其中包括 5663 名参与者的数据。在为期 5 年的随访中,有 447 例死亡得到确认。基于机器学习技术,利用常见的实验室检测方法开发出了基于机器学习的常规血液检查预后指数(MARBE-PI)。根据 MARBE-PI 分数,通过分层似然比分析将参与者分为多个风险类别。随后,MARBE-PI 在日本的一个独立人群队列中进行了外部验证:除年龄、性别、教育程度和体重指数外,通过逐步逻辑回归,六项实验室检测(低密度脂蛋白、白蛋白、谷草转氨酶、淋巴细胞计数、hsCRP 和肌酐)成为预测 5 年死亡率的关键因素。在内部和外部验证数据集中,通过逻辑回归构建的 MARBE-PI 的 AUC 分别为 0.799(95% CI:0.778-0.819)和 0.756(95% CI:0.694-0.814);在这两个数据集中,通过逻辑回归构建的 MARBE-PI 的 AUC 分别为 0.801(95% CI:0.790-0.811)和 0.809(95% CI:0.774-0.845)。按 MARBE-PI 分层的风险类别与死亡率呈一致的剂量-反应关系。MARBE-PI的表现也与根据临床健康缺陷和/或实验室结果构建的指数相当:MARBE-PI被认为是在繁忙的临床环境中最适用于风险分层的测量方法。结论:MARBE-PI 被认为是在繁忙的临床环境中最适用于风险分层的测量方法,它有可能准确定位死亡风险较高的老年人,从而帮助临床决策。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Develop and Validate a Prognostic Index With Laboratory Tests to Predict Mortality in Middle-Aged and Older Adults Using Machine Learning Models: A Prospective Cohort Study.

Background: Prognostic indices can enhance personalized predictions of health burdens. However, a simple, practical, and reproducible tool is lacking for clinical use. This study aimed to develop a machine learning-based prognostic index for predicting all-cause mortality in community-dwelling older individuals.

Methods: We utilized the Healthy Aging Longitudinal Study in Taiwan (HALST) cohort, encompassing data from 5 663 participants. Over the 5-year follow-up, 447 deaths were confirmed. A machine learning-based routine blood examination prognostic index (MARBE-PI) was developed using common laboratory tests based on machine learning techniques. Participants were grouped into multiple risk categories by stratum-specific likelihood ratio analysis based on their MARBE-PI scores. The MARBE-PI was subsequently externally validated with an independent population-based cohort from Japan.

Results: Beyond age, sex, education level, and BMI, 6 laboratory tests (low-density lipoprotein, albumin, aspartate aminotransferase, lymphocyte count, high-sensitivity C-reactive protein, and creatinine) emerged as pivotal predictors via stepwise logistic regression (LR) for 5-year mortality. The area under curves of MARBE-PI constructed by LR were 0.799 (95% confidence interval [95% CI]: 0.778-0.819) and 0.756 (95% CI: 0.694-0.814) for the internal and external validation data sets, and were 0.801 (95% CI: 0.790-0.811) and 0.809 (95% CI: 0.774-0.845) for the extended 10-year mortality in both data sets, respectively. Risk categories stratified by MARBE-PI showed a consistent dose-response association with mortality. The MARBE-PI also performed comparably with indices constructed with clinical health deficits and/or laboratory results.

Conclusions: The MARBE-PI is considered the most applicable measure for risk stratification in busy clinical settings. It holds potential to pinpoint older individuals at elevated mortality risk, thereby aiding clinical decision-making.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信