基线特征会影响抑郁症状的治疗成功率吗?来自 CONEMO 的事后分组分析。

IF 3.6 3区 医学 Q1 PSYCHIATRY
Revista Brasileira de Psiquiatria Pub Date : 2024-01-01 Epub Date: 2024-01-30 DOI:10.47626/1516-4446-2023-3172
Heloísa Garcia Claro, Paulo Rossi Menezes, Ivan Filipe Fernandes, Nadine Seward, Juan Jaime Miranda, Maria Giovana Borges Saidel, Aline Geovanna de Lima Baquete, Kate L Daley, Suzana Aschar, Daniela Vera Cruz, Hellen Carolina Martins Castro, Thais Rocha, Julieta Quayle, Tim J Peters, Ricardo Araya
{"title":"基线特征会影响抑郁症状的治疗成功率吗?来自 CONEMO 的事后分组分析。","authors":"Heloísa Garcia Claro, Paulo Rossi Menezes, Ivan Filipe Fernandes, Nadine Seward, Juan Jaime Miranda, Maria Giovana Borges Saidel, Aline Geovanna de Lima Baquete, Kate L Daley, Suzana Aschar, Daniela Vera Cruz, Hellen Carolina Martins Castro, Thais Rocha, Julieta Quayle, Tim J Peters, Ricardo Araya","doi":"10.47626/1516-4446-2023-3172","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To ascertain whether sociodemographic and health-related characteristics known from previous research to have a substantive impact on recovery from depression modified the effect of a digital intervention designed to improve depressive symptoms (CONEMO).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The CONEMO study consisted of two randomized controlled trials, one conducted in Lima, Peru, and one in São Paulo, Brazil. As a secondary trial plan analysis, mixed logistic regression was used to explore interactions between the treatment arm and subgroups of interest defined by characteristics measured before randomization - suicidal ideation, race/color, age, gender, income, type of mobile phone, alcohol misuse, tobacco use, and diabetes/hypertension - in both trials. We estimated interaction effects between the treatment group and these subgroup factors for the secondary outcomes using linear mixed regression models.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Increased effects of the CONEMO intervention on the primary outcome (reduction of at least 50% in depressive symptom scores at 3-month follow-up) were observed among older and wealthier participants in the Lima trial (p = 0.030 and p = 0.001, respectively).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>There was no evidence of such differential effects in São Paulo, and no evidence of impact of any other secondary outcomes in either trial.</p><p><strong>Clinical trial registration: </strong>NCT02846662 (São Paulo, Brazil - SP), NCT03026426 (Lima, Peru - LI).</p>","PeriodicalId":21244,"journal":{"name":"Revista Brasileira de Psiquiatria","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11189110/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Do baseline participant characteristics impact the effectiveness of a mobile health intervention for depressive symptoms? A post-hoc subgroup analysis of the CONEMO trials.\",\"authors\":\"Heloísa Garcia Claro, Paulo Rossi Menezes, Ivan Filipe Fernandes, Nadine Seward, Juan Jaime Miranda, Maria Giovana Borges Saidel, Aline Geovanna de Lima Baquete, Kate L Daley, Suzana Aschar, Daniela Vera Cruz, Hellen Carolina Martins Castro, Thais Rocha, Julieta Quayle, Tim J Peters, Ricardo Araya\",\"doi\":\"10.47626/1516-4446-2023-3172\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To ascertain whether sociodemographic and health-related characteristics known from previous research to have a substantive impact on recovery from depression modified the effect of a digital intervention designed to improve depressive symptoms (CONEMO).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The CONEMO study consisted of two randomized controlled trials, one conducted in Lima, Peru, and one in São Paulo, Brazil. As a secondary trial plan analysis, mixed logistic regression was used to explore interactions between the treatment arm and subgroups of interest defined by characteristics measured before randomization - suicidal ideation, race/color, age, gender, income, type of mobile phone, alcohol misuse, tobacco use, and diabetes/hypertension - in both trials. We estimated interaction effects between the treatment group and these subgroup factors for the secondary outcomes using linear mixed regression models.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Increased effects of the CONEMO intervention on the primary outcome (reduction of at least 50% in depressive symptom scores at 3-month follow-up) were observed among older and wealthier participants in the Lima trial (p = 0.030 and p = 0.001, respectively).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>There was no evidence of such differential effects in São Paulo, and no evidence of impact of any other secondary outcomes in either trial.</p><p><strong>Clinical trial registration: </strong>NCT02846662 (São Paulo, Brazil - SP), NCT03026426 (Lima, Peru - LI).</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":21244,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Revista Brasileira de Psiquiatria\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11189110/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Revista Brasileira de Psiquiatria\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.47626/1516-4446-2023-3172\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/1/30 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHIATRY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista Brasileira de Psiquiatria","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.47626/1516-4446-2023-3172","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/30 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的作为二次试验计划分析,我们旨在研究随机化前测量的参与者特征是否会改变旨在改善抑郁症状的数字干预(CONEMO--情绪控制)对抑郁症康复的影响,该干预对以往的研究产生了实质性影响:采用混合逻辑回归法探讨治疗组与相关亚组(包括自杀倾向、种族/肤色、年龄、性别、收入、手机类型、酗酒、吸烟和糖尿病/高血压)之间的交互作用。我们使用线性混合回归模型估算了治疗组与这些亚组因素对次要结果的交互影响:在利马年龄较大和较富裕的参与者中观察到,CONEMO 干预对主要结果(三个月随访时抑郁症状得分至少减少 50%)的影响更大(p 值分别为 0.030 和 0.001)。同时,在圣保罗和这两个国家的任何其他次要结果层面,都没有证据表明存在这种差异效应:结论:在初级医疗机构中使用的数字化干预措施必须是可获得的。我们的结论是,除了利马试验中的收入和年龄外,技术干预 CONEMO 对所研究的大多数亚组没有异质性影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Do baseline participant characteristics impact the effectiveness of a mobile health intervention for depressive symptoms? A post-hoc subgroup analysis of the CONEMO trials.

Objective: To ascertain whether sociodemographic and health-related characteristics known from previous research to have a substantive impact on recovery from depression modified the effect of a digital intervention designed to improve depressive symptoms (CONEMO).

Methods: The CONEMO study consisted of two randomized controlled trials, one conducted in Lima, Peru, and one in São Paulo, Brazil. As a secondary trial plan analysis, mixed logistic regression was used to explore interactions between the treatment arm and subgroups of interest defined by characteristics measured before randomization - suicidal ideation, race/color, age, gender, income, type of mobile phone, alcohol misuse, tobacco use, and diabetes/hypertension - in both trials. We estimated interaction effects between the treatment group and these subgroup factors for the secondary outcomes using linear mixed regression models.

Results: Increased effects of the CONEMO intervention on the primary outcome (reduction of at least 50% in depressive symptom scores at 3-month follow-up) were observed among older and wealthier participants in the Lima trial (p = 0.030 and p = 0.001, respectively).

Conclusion: There was no evidence of such differential effects in São Paulo, and no evidence of impact of any other secondary outcomes in either trial.

Clinical trial registration: NCT02846662 (São Paulo, Brazil - SP), NCT03026426 (Lima, Peru - LI).

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Revista Brasileira de Psiquiatria
Revista Brasileira de Psiquiatria 医学-精神病学
CiteScore
6.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
83
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Revista Brasileira de Psiquiatria (RBP) is the official organ of the Associação Brasileira de Psiquiatria (ABP - Brazilian Association of Psychiatry). The Brazilian Journal of Psychiatry is a bimonthly publication that aims to publish original manuscripts in all areas of psychiatry, including public health, clinical epidemiology, basic science, and mental health problems. The journal is fully open access, and there are no article processing or publication fees. Articles must be written in English.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信