超保守通气孔是否会阻碍下颌切牙的牙髓再干预?一项实验室调查。

IF 1.9 Q2 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE
International Journal of Dentistry Pub Date : 2024-02-03 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.1155/2024/5516067
Caroline Meurer Luiz, Taynara Santos Goulart, Ketillyn da Silva Magalhães, Gilmar da Rosa Souza Junior, Lucas da Fonseca Roberti Garcia, Josiane de Almeida
{"title":"超保守通气孔是否会阻碍下颌切牙的牙髓再干预?一项实验室调查。","authors":"Caroline Meurer Luiz, Taynara Santos Goulart, Ketillyn da Silva Magalhães, Gilmar da Rosa Souza Junior, Lucas da Fonseca Roberti Garcia, Josiane de Almeida","doi":"10.1155/2024/5516067","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This study assessed the influence of the type of endodontic access cavity on endodontic reintervention. Twenty mandibular central incisors were distributed into two groups (<i>n</i> = 10): TradAC group-traditional access cavities and UltraAC.Inc group-ultraconservative access cavities. After endodontic access, the root canals were prepared and obturated by the single cone technique. The filling material was removed with the Reciproc R25 instrument, followed by reinstrumentation with the R40 instrument. Images acquisition of each root canal hemisection was performed in a stereomicroscope to quantify the amount of remaining filling material. The amount of remaining filling material attached to the root canal walls was expressed in square millimeter (mm<sup>2</sup>). Data were statistically analyzed (one-way ANOVA and post hoc Student's <i>t</i>-tests). There was no statistically significant difference between TradAC and UltraAC.Inc groups (<i>p</i> > 0.05). None of the tested endodontics' access showed root canal walls completely free of filling material. Ultraconservative access cavities in mandibular incisors had no negative impact on the filling material removal.</p>","PeriodicalId":13947,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Dentistry","volume":"2024 ","pages":"5516067"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10858794/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Do Ultraconservative Access Cavities Hinder Endodontic Reintervention in Mandibular Incisors? A Laboratory Investigation.\",\"authors\":\"Caroline Meurer Luiz, Taynara Santos Goulart, Ketillyn da Silva Magalhães, Gilmar da Rosa Souza Junior, Lucas da Fonseca Roberti Garcia, Josiane de Almeida\",\"doi\":\"10.1155/2024/5516067\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>This study assessed the influence of the type of endodontic access cavity on endodontic reintervention. Twenty mandibular central incisors were distributed into two groups (<i>n</i> = 10): TradAC group-traditional access cavities and UltraAC.Inc group-ultraconservative access cavities. After endodontic access, the root canals were prepared and obturated by the single cone technique. The filling material was removed with the Reciproc R25 instrument, followed by reinstrumentation with the R40 instrument. Images acquisition of each root canal hemisection was performed in a stereomicroscope to quantify the amount of remaining filling material. The amount of remaining filling material attached to the root canal walls was expressed in square millimeter (mm<sup>2</sup>). Data were statistically analyzed (one-way ANOVA and post hoc Student's <i>t</i>-tests). There was no statistically significant difference between TradAC and UltraAC.Inc groups (<i>p</i> > 0.05). None of the tested endodontics' access showed root canal walls completely free of filling material. Ultraconservative access cavities in mandibular incisors had no negative impact on the filling material removal.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":13947,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Dentistry\",\"volume\":\"2024 \",\"pages\":\"5516067\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-02-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10858794/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Dentistry\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1155/2024/5516067\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Dentistry","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1155/2024/5516067","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究评估了牙髓通路洞的类型对牙髓再干预的影响。20 颗下颌中切牙被分为两组(n = 10):TradAC 组--传统通路洞,UltraAC.Inc 组--超保守通路洞。根管治疗后,采用单锥技术对根管进行预备和钝化。用 Reciproc R25器械去除充填材料,然后用 R40器械重新插入。在体视显微镜下采集每个根管半切面的图像,以量化剩余填充材料的数量。附着在根管壁上的剩余填充材料量以平方毫米(mm2)表示。对数据进行统计分析(单因素方差分析和事后学生 t 检验)。TradAC 组和 UltraAC.Inc 组之间没有明显的统计学差异(p > 0.05)。在测试的根管治疗通路中,没有一个通路的根管壁完全没有充填材料。下颌切牙的超保守通路龋洞对充填材料的清除没有负面影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Do Ultraconservative Access Cavities Hinder Endodontic Reintervention in Mandibular Incisors? A Laboratory Investigation.

This study assessed the influence of the type of endodontic access cavity on endodontic reintervention. Twenty mandibular central incisors were distributed into two groups (n = 10): TradAC group-traditional access cavities and UltraAC.Inc group-ultraconservative access cavities. After endodontic access, the root canals were prepared and obturated by the single cone technique. The filling material was removed with the Reciproc R25 instrument, followed by reinstrumentation with the R40 instrument. Images acquisition of each root canal hemisection was performed in a stereomicroscope to quantify the amount of remaining filling material. The amount of remaining filling material attached to the root canal walls was expressed in square millimeter (mm2). Data were statistically analyzed (one-way ANOVA and post hoc Student's t-tests). There was no statistically significant difference between TradAC and UltraAC.Inc groups (p > 0.05). None of the tested endodontics' access showed root canal walls completely free of filling material. Ultraconservative access cavities in mandibular incisors had no negative impact on the filling material removal.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
International Journal of Dentistry
International Journal of Dentistry DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE-
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
4.80%
发文量
219
审稿时长
20 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信