Hasan Maral , Ömer Çeçen , Ayşegül Türk Baydır , Musa Türkmen
{"title":"杂交种 Salvia × karamanensis Celep & B. T. Drew 及其亲本 (Salvia aucheri Benth. subsp. canescens (Boiss. & Heldr.) Celep, Kahraman & Dogan × Salvia heldreichiana Boiss. ex Benth.) 的精油成分和抗氧化活性测定","authors":"Hasan Maral , Ömer Çeçen , Ayşegül Türk Baydır , Musa Türkmen","doi":"10.1016/j.bse.2024.104795","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Salvia × <em>karamanensis</em> is endemic to Türkiye and is a hybrid of <em>Salvia aucheri</em> subsp. <em>canescens</em> and <em>Salvia heldreichiana.</em> In this study, the essential oil content and composition of <em>S.</em> × <em>karamanensis</em> hybrid species and its parents <em>S. aucheri</em> subsp. <em>canescens</em>, <em>S. heldreichiana</em> were determined. Essential oils of the plants were obtained by hydro distillation method using Clevenger apparatus for 3 h and the essential oil components were determined by GC-MS. As a result of the distillation, it was determined that <em>S. aucheri</em> subsp. <em>canescens</em>, contains 0.80%, while <em>S.</em> × <em>karamanensis</em> and <em>S. heldreichiana</em> contain 0.64 and 0.48% essential oil, respectively. The major components of the essential oils were borneol, 1,8-cineole, camphor, α-pinene, borneol and α-terpineol. The DPPH antiradical activity of the samples was determined as 46.70 ± 0.09, 33.78 ± 0.68 and 25.93 ± 0.72 (<em>S. aucheri</em> subsp. <em>canescens</em>, <em>S.</em> × <em>karamanensis</em> and S. <em>heldreichiana</em>), respectively. The highest phenolic content in terms of gallic acid was obtained from <em>S. aucheri</em> subsp. <em>canescens</em> with 15,02 mg/100 ml, followed by <em>S.</em> × <em>karamanensis</em> with 14,43 mg/100 ml and S. <em>heldreichiana</em> with 13,43 mg/100 ml.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":8799,"journal":{"name":"Biochemical Systematics and Ecology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Determination of essential oil constituents and antioxidant activities of hybrid species Salvia × karamanensis Celep & B. T. Drew and its parents (Salvia aucheri Benth. subsp. canescens (Boiss. & Heldr.) Celep, Kahraman & Dogan × Salvia heldreichiana Boiss. ex Benth.)\",\"authors\":\"Hasan Maral , Ömer Çeçen , Ayşegül Türk Baydır , Musa Türkmen\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.bse.2024.104795\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Salvia × <em>karamanensis</em> is endemic to Türkiye and is a hybrid of <em>Salvia aucheri</em> subsp. <em>canescens</em> and <em>Salvia heldreichiana.</em> In this study, the essential oil content and composition of <em>S.</em> × <em>karamanensis</em> hybrid species and its parents <em>S. aucheri</em> subsp. <em>canescens</em>, <em>S. heldreichiana</em> were determined. Essential oils of the plants were obtained by hydro distillation method using Clevenger apparatus for 3 h and the essential oil components were determined by GC-MS. As a result of the distillation, it was determined that <em>S. aucheri</em> subsp. <em>canescens</em>, contains 0.80%, while <em>S.</em> × <em>karamanensis</em> and <em>S. heldreichiana</em> contain 0.64 and 0.48% essential oil, respectively. The major components of the essential oils were borneol, 1,8-cineole, camphor, α-pinene, borneol and α-terpineol. The DPPH antiradical activity of the samples was determined as 46.70 ± 0.09, 33.78 ± 0.68 and 25.93 ± 0.72 (<em>S. aucheri</em> subsp. <em>canescens</em>, <em>S.</em> × <em>karamanensis</em> and S. <em>heldreichiana</em>), respectively. The highest phenolic content in terms of gallic acid was obtained from <em>S. aucheri</em> subsp. <em>canescens</em> with 15,02 mg/100 ml, followed by <em>S.</em> × <em>karamanensis</em> with 14,43 mg/100 ml and S. <em>heldreichiana</em> with 13,43 mg/100 ml.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":8799,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Biochemical Systematics and Ecology\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-02-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Biochemical Systematics and Ecology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"99\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0305197824000127\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"生物学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"BIOCHEMISTRY & MOLECULAR BIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Biochemical Systematics and Ecology","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0305197824000127","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"BIOCHEMISTRY & MOLECULAR BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
Salvia × karamanensis 是土耳其特有的植物，是 Salvia aucheri subsp.本研究测定了 S. × karamanensis 杂交种及其亲本 S. aucheri subsp.使用 Clevenger 仪器通过水蒸馏法对植物精油进行 3 小时蒸馏，并通过气相色谱-质谱法测定精油成分。蒸馏结果表明，S. aucheri subsp. canescens 的精油含量为 0.80%，而 S. × karamanensis 和 S. heldreichiana 的精油含量分别为 0.64% 和 0.48%。精油的主要成分是龙脑、1,8-松油醇、樟脑、α-蒎烯、龙脑和α-松油醇。样品的 DPPH 抗自由基活性分别为 46.70 ± 0.09、33.78 ± 0.68 和 25.93 ± 0.72（S. aucheri subsp. canescens、S. × karamanensis 和 S. heldreichiana）。S. aucheri subsp. canescens 的没食子酸酚含量最高，为 15.02 毫克/100 毫升，其次是 S. × karamanensis，为 14.43 毫克/100 毫升，S. heldreichiana 为 13.43 毫克/100 毫升。
Determination of essential oil constituents and antioxidant activities of hybrid species Salvia × karamanensis Celep & B. T. Drew and its parents (Salvia aucheri Benth. subsp. canescens (Boiss. & Heldr.) Celep, Kahraman & Dogan × Salvia heldreichiana Boiss. ex Benth.)
Salvia × karamanensis is endemic to Türkiye and is a hybrid of Salvia aucheri subsp. canescens and Salvia heldreichiana. In this study, the essential oil content and composition of S. × karamanensis hybrid species and its parents S. aucheri subsp. canescens, S. heldreichiana were determined. Essential oils of the plants were obtained by hydro distillation method using Clevenger apparatus for 3 h and the essential oil components were determined by GC-MS. As a result of the distillation, it was determined that S. aucheri subsp. canescens, contains 0.80%, while S. × karamanensis and S. heldreichiana contain 0.64 and 0.48% essential oil, respectively. The major components of the essential oils were borneol, 1,8-cineole, camphor, α-pinene, borneol and α-terpineol. The DPPH antiradical activity of the samples was determined as 46.70 ± 0.09, 33.78 ± 0.68 and 25.93 ± 0.72 (S. aucheri subsp. canescens, S. × karamanensis and S. heldreichiana), respectively. The highest phenolic content in terms of gallic acid was obtained from S. aucheri subsp. canescens with 15,02 mg/100 ml, followed by S. × karamanensis with 14,43 mg/100 ml and S. heldreichiana with 13,43 mg/100 ml.
期刊介绍：
Biochemical Systematics and Ecology is devoted to the publication of original papers and reviews, both submitted and invited, in two subject areas: I) the application of biochemistry to problems relating to systematic biology of organisms (biochemical systematics); II) the role of biochemistry in interactions between organisms or between an organism and its environment (biochemical ecology).
In the Biochemical Systematics subject area, comparative studies of the distribution of (secondary) metabolites within a wider taxon (e.g. genus or family) are welcome. Comparative studies, encompassing multiple accessions of each of the taxa within their distribution are particularly encouraged. Welcome are also studies combining classical chemosystematic studies (such as comparative HPLC-MS or GC-MS investigations) with (macro-) molecular phylogenetic studies. Studies that involve the comparative use of compounds to help differentiate among species such as adulterants or substitutes that illustrate the applied use of chemosystematics are welcome. In contrast, studies solely employing macromolecular phylogenetic techniques (gene sequences, RAPD studies etc.) will be considered out of scope. Discouraged are manuscripts that report known or new compounds from a single source taxon without addressing a systematic hypothesis. Also considered out of scope are studies using outdated and hard to reproduce macromolecular techniques such as RAPDs in combination with standard chemosystematic techniques such as GC-FID and GC-MS.
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
京公网安备 11010802042870号
