{"title":"泰国口臭量表》和《口臭总和量表》的跨文化改编。","authors":"Chotima Lapnimitanun, Paswach Wiriyakijja, Oranart Matangkasombut, Orapin Komin","doi":"10.1111/odi.14891","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To cross-culturally adapt and validate the Thai version of the Xerostomia Inventory (XI) and Summated Xerostomia Inventory (SXI) for subjective evaluation of oral dryness in Thai middle-aged and older adults.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The original English versions of the XI and SXI were cross-culturally translated into Thai. Content validity was examined by the expert panel and 30 pilot subjects. The XI/SXI-Thai were then administered to 200 Thai adults (aged 50 years or older) for further assessment of psychometric properties. The standard question, the Bother Index, and the Xerostomia Questionnaire were used as comparator instruments for the evaluation of criterion and construct validity, respectively. Internal consistency reliability was assessed using Cronbach's alpha.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The final XI/SXI-Thai were found to have good content validity. Both scales were able to distinguish between xerostomia and non-xerostomia groups. We observed moderate to strong correlation between the XI/SXI-Thai and other comparator instruments, reflecting good criterion and construct validity. Cronbach's alpha values were 0.875 and 0.847 for the XI-Thai and SXI-Thai, respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The XI-Thai and SXI-Thai were found to be valid, reliable, and easily administrable instruments for xerostomia assessment in Thai middle-aged and older individuals in both clinical and research settings.</p>","PeriodicalId":19615,"journal":{"name":"Oral diseases","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Cross-cultural adaptation of the Thai Xerostomia Inventory and Summated Xerostomia Inventory.\",\"authors\":\"Chotima Lapnimitanun, Paswach Wiriyakijja, Oranart Matangkasombut, Orapin Komin\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/odi.14891\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To cross-culturally adapt and validate the Thai version of the Xerostomia Inventory (XI) and Summated Xerostomia Inventory (SXI) for subjective evaluation of oral dryness in Thai middle-aged and older adults.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The original English versions of the XI and SXI were cross-culturally translated into Thai. Content validity was examined by the expert panel and 30 pilot subjects. The XI/SXI-Thai were then administered to 200 Thai adults (aged 50 years or older) for further assessment of psychometric properties. The standard question, the Bother Index, and the Xerostomia Questionnaire were used as comparator instruments for the evaluation of criterion and construct validity, respectively. Internal consistency reliability was assessed using Cronbach's alpha.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The final XI/SXI-Thai were found to have good content validity. Both scales were able to distinguish between xerostomia and non-xerostomia groups. We observed moderate to strong correlation between the XI/SXI-Thai and other comparator instruments, reflecting good criterion and construct validity. Cronbach's alpha values were 0.875 and 0.847 for the XI-Thai and SXI-Thai, respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The XI-Thai and SXI-Thai were found to be valid, reliable, and easily administrable instruments for xerostomia assessment in Thai middle-aged and older individuals in both clinical and research settings.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19615,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Oral diseases\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Oral diseases\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/odi.14891\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/2/11 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Oral diseases","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/odi.14891","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/2/11 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
Cross-cultural adaptation of the Thai Xerostomia Inventory and Summated Xerostomia Inventory.
Objective: To cross-culturally adapt and validate the Thai version of the Xerostomia Inventory (XI) and Summated Xerostomia Inventory (SXI) for subjective evaluation of oral dryness in Thai middle-aged and older adults.
Methods: The original English versions of the XI and SXI were cross-culturally translated into Thai. Content validity was examined by the expert panel and 30 pilot subjects. The XI/SXI-Thai were then administered to 200 Thai adults (aged 50 years or older) for further assessment of psychometric properties. The standard question, the Bother Index, and the Xerostomia Questionnaire were used as comparator instruments for the evaluation of criterion and construct validity, respectively. Internal consistency reliability was assessed using Cronbach's alpha.
Results: The final XI/SXI-Thai were found to have good content validity. Both scales were able to distinguish between xerostomia and non-xerostomia groups. We observed moderate to strong correlation between the XI/SXI-Thai and other comparator instruments, reflecting good criterion and construct validity. Cronbach's alpha values were 0.875 and 0.847 for the XI-Thai and SXI-Thai, respectively.
Conclusions: The XI-Thai and SXI-Thai were found to be valid, reliable, and easily administrable instruments for xerostomia assessment in Thai middle-aged and older individuals in both clinical and research settings.
期刊介绍：
Oral Diseases is a multidisciplinary and international journal with a focus on head and neck disorders, edited by leaders in the field, Professor Giovanni Lodi (Editor-in-Chief, Milan, Italy), Professor Stefano Petti (Deputy Editor, Rome, Italy) and Associate Professor Gulshan Sunavala-Dossabhoy (Deputy Editor, Shreveport, LA, USA). The journal is pre-eminent in oral medicine. Oral Diseases specifically strives to link often-isolated areas of dentistry and medicine through broad-based scholarship that includes well-designed and controlled clinical research, analytical epidemiology, and the translation of basic science in pre-clinical studies. The journal typically publishes articles relevant to many related medical specialties including especially dermatology, gastroenterology, hematology, immunology, infectious diseases, neuropsychiatry, oncology and otolaryngology. The essential requirement is that all submitted research is hypothesis-driven, with significant positive and negative results both welcomed. Equal publication emphasis is placed on etiology, pathogenesis, diagnosis, prevention and treatment.
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
京公网安备 11010802042870号
