Julia Zepf, Anita Züger, Ladina Vonzun, Ladina Rüegg, Nele Strübing, Franziska Krähenmann, Martin Meuli, Luca Mazzone, Ueli Moehrlen, Nicole Ochsenbein-Kölble
{"title":"在开放式胎儿脊柱裂修复手术中加强术后恢复(ERAS)。","authors":"Julia Zepf, Anita Züger, Ladina Vonzun, Ladina Rüegg, Nele Strübing, Franziska Krähenmann, Martin Meuli, Luca Mazzone, Ueli Moehrlen, Nicole Ochsenbein-Kölble","doi":"10.1159/000537758","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>For open fetal spina bifida (fSB) repair, a maternal laparotomy is required. Hence, enhanced maternal recovery after surgery (ERAS) is paramount. A revision of our ERAS protocol was made, including changes in operative techniques and postoperative pain management. This study investigates eventual benefits.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Our study included 111 women with open fSB repair at our center. The old protocol group (group 1) either received a transverse incision of the fascia with transection of the rectus abdominis muscle (RAM) or a longitudinal incision of the fascia without RAM transection, depending on placental location. The new protocol required longitudinal incisions in all patients (group 2). Postoperative pain management was changed from tramadol to oxycodone/naloxone. Outcomes of the two different protocol groups were analyzed and compared regarding the primary endpoint, the length of hospital stay (LOS) after fetal surgery, as well as regarding the following secondary endpoints: postoperative pain scores, day of first mobilization, removal of urinary catheter, bowel movement, and the occurrence of maternal and fetal complications.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Out of 111 women, 82 (73.9%) were in group 1 and 29 (26.1%) were in group 2. Women in group 2 showed a significantly shorter LOS (18 [14-23] days vs. 27 [18-39] days, p = 0.002), duration until mobilization (3 [2-3] days vs. 3 [3-4] days, p = 0.03), and removal of urinary catheter (day 3 [3-3] vs. day 4 [3-4], p = 0.004). Group 2 less often received morphine subcutaneously (0% vs. 35.4%, p < 0.001) or intravenously (0% vs. 17.1%, p = 0.02) but more often oxycodone (69.0% vs. 18.3%, p < 0.001). No significant differences were seen regarding pain scores, bowel movement, and maternal and/or fetal complications.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The new ERAS protocol that combined changes in surgical technique and pain medication led to better outcomes while reducing LOS. Continuous revisions of current ERAS protocols are essential to improve patient care continuously.</p>","PeriodicalId":12189,"journal":{"name":"Fetal Diagnosis and Therapy","volume":" ","pages":"267-277"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11152011/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Enhanced Recovery after Surgery in Open Fetal Spina Bifida Repair.\",\"authors\":\"Julia Zepf, Anita Züger, Ladina Vonzun, Ladina Rüegg, Nele Strübing, Franziska Krähenmann, Martin Meuli, Luca Mazzone, Ueli Moehrlen, Nicole Ochsenbein-Kölble\",\"doi\":\"10.1159/000537758\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>For open fetal spina bifida (fSB) repair, a maternal laparotomy is required. Hence, enhanced maternal recovery after surgery (ERAS) is paramount. A revision of our ERAS protocol was made, including changes in operative techniques and postoperative pain management. This study investigates eventual benefits.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Our study included 111 women with open fSB repair at our center. The old protocol group (group 1) either received a transverse incision of the fascia with transection of the rectus abdominis muscle (RAM) or a longitudinal incision of the fascia without RAM transection, depending on placental location. The new protocol required longitudinal incisions in all patients (group 2). Postoperative pain management was changed from tramadol to oxycodone/naloxone. Outcomes of the two different protocol groups were analyzed and compared regarding the primary endpoint, the length of hospital stay (LOS) after fetal surgery, as well as regarding the following secondary endpoints: postoperative pain scores, day of first mobilization, removal of urinary catheter, bowel movement, and the occurrence of maternal and fetal complications.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Out of 111 women, 82 (73.9%) were in group 1 and 29 (26.1%) were in group 2. Women in group 2 showed a significantly shorter LOS (18 [14-23] days vs. 27 [18-39] days, p = 0.002), duration until mobilization (3 [2-3] days vs. 3 [3-4] days, p = 0.03), and removal of urinary catheter (day 3 [3-3] vs. day 4 [3-4], p = 0.004). Group 2 less often received morphine subcutaneously (0% vs. 35.4%, p < 0.001) or intravenously (0% vs. 17.1%, p = 0.02) but more often oxycodone (69.0% vs. 18.3%, p < 0.001). No significant differences were seen regarding pain scores, bowel movement, and maternal and/or fetal complications.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The new ERAS protocol that combined changes in surgical technique and pain medication led to better outcomes while reducing LOS. Continuous revisions of current ERAS protocols are essential to improve patient care continuously.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12189,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Fetal Diagnosis and Therapy\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"267-277\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11152011/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Fetal Diagnosis and Therapy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1159/000537758\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/2/10 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Fetal Diagnosis and Therapy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000537758","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/2/10 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
介绍:开放式胎儿脊柱裂(fSB)修补术需要对产妇进行开腹手术。因此,加强产妇术后恢复(ERAS)至关重要。我们对ERAS方案进行了修订,包括改变手术技术和术后疼痛管理。本研究调查了最终的收益:我们的研究包括 111 名在本中心接受开放式 fSB 修复术的女性。根据胎盘位置,旧方案组(第1组)采用横切筋膜并横断腹直肌(RAM),或纵切筋膜但不横断腹直肌(RAM)。新方案要求对所有患者(第 2 组)进行纵向切口。术后疼痛治疗由曲马多改为羟考酮/纳洛酮。对两个不同方案组的主要终点--胎儿手术后住院时间(LOS)以及以下次要终点--术后疼痛评分、首次活动天数、拔除导尿管、排便以及母体和胎儿并发症的发生情况进行了分析和比较:在 111 名产妇中,82 人(73.9%)属于第一组,29 人(26.1%)属于第二组。第二组产妇的住院时间(18 [14-23] 天 vs. 27 [18-39] 天,p = 0.002)、活动时间(3 [2-3] 天 vs. 3 [3-4] 天,p = 0.03)和拔除导尿管时间(第 3 [3-3] 天 vs. 第 4 [3-4] 天,p = 0.004)均明显缩短。第二组接受吗啡皮下注射(0% vs. 35.4%,p < 0.001)或静脉注射(0% vs. 17.1%,p = 0.02)的频率较低,但接受羟考酮(69.0% vs. 18.3%,p < 0.001)的频率较高。在疼痛评分、肠蠕动、母体和/或胎儿并发症方面没有发现明显差异:结论:新的ERAS方案结合了手术技巧和止痛药物的改变,在缩短住院时间的同时取得了更好的效果。不断修订当前的ERAS方案对于持续改善患者护理至关重要。
Enhanced Recovery after Surgery in Open Fetal Spina Bifida Repair.
Introduction: For open fetal spina bifida (fSB) repair, a maternal laparotomy is required. Hence, enhanced maternal recovery after surgery (ERAS) is paramount. A revision of our ERAS protocol was made, including changes in operative techniques and postoperative pain management. This study investigates eventual benefits.
Methods: Our study included 111 women with open fSB repair at our center. The old protocol group (group 1) either received a transverse incision of the fascia with transection of the rectus abdominis muscle (RAM) or a longitudinal incision of the fascia without RAM transection, depending on placental location. The new protocol required longitudinal incisions in all patients (group 2). Postoperative pain management was changed from tramadol to oxycodone/naloxone. Outcomes of the two different protocol groups were analyzed and compared regarding the primary endpoint, the length of hospital stay (LOS) after fetal surgery, as well as regarding the following secondary endpoints: postoperative pain scores, day of first mobilization, removal of urinary catheter, bowel movement, and the occurrence of maternal and fetal complications.
Results: Out of 111 women, 82 (73.9%) were in group 1 and 29 (26.1%) were in group 2. Women in group 2 showed a significantly shorter LOS (18 [14-23] days vs. 27 [18-39] days, p = 0.002), duration until mobilization (3 [2-3] days vs. 3 [3-4] days, p = 0.03), and removal of urinary catheter (day 3 [3-3] vs. day 4 [3-4], p = 0.004). Group 2 less often received morphine subcutaneously (0% vs. 35.4%, p < 0.001) or intravenously (0% vs. 17.1%, p = 0.02) but more often oxycodone (69.0% vs. 18.3%, p < 0.001). No significant differences were seen regarding pain scores, bowel movement, and maternal and/or fetal complications.
Conclusion: The new ERAS protocol that combined changes in surgical technique and pain medication led to better outcomes while reducing LOS. Continuous revisions of current ERAS protocols are essential to improve patient care continuously.
期刊介绍:
The first journal to focus on the fetus as a patient, ''Fetal Diagnosis and Therapy'' provides a wide range of biomedical specialists with a single source of reports encompassing the common discipline of fetal medicine.