短路 FMR 方法中 Co-Ni 铁氧体纳米粒子的场扫描和频率扫描评估比较

IF 1.2 4区 综合性期刊 Q3 MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES
Sadeq H. Lafta
{"title":"短路 FMR 方法中 Co-Ni 铁氧体纳米粒子的场扫描和频率扫描评估比较","authors":"Sadeq H. Lafta","doi":"10.1016/j.kjs.2024.100199","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Broadband ferromagnetic resonance (BFMR) spectroscopy analysis can be achieved with different setups involving the frequency-sweep and field-sweep setups. To evaluate and compare the two former regimes, a frequency-sweep and a field-sweep shortcut BFMR regimes were conducted on Co–Ni ferrite nanoparticles that were synthesized by the co-precipitation method of metal chlorides. The nanoparticles were structurally and magnetically characterized, with an average particle size of around 23 nm and a spinel structure. The saturation magnetization was about 59 emu/g, and the coercivity was about 30 Oe. The BFMR analyses were achieved through a frequency range of (2–26) GHz and a field range of (0-10<sup>4</sup>)Oe. The two regimes, frequency sweep and field sweep, showed linear behavior between the resonance field and resonance frequency. The frequency–sweep regime displayed more complicated curves involving small multi-peaks within the multi-FMR absorption band that were not found in the field sweep regime. The intercepts of the linear dispersion relationship between the two regimes are nearly equivalent to each other. The field-sweep g-factor was higher and more reasonable than the frequency-sweep one, whereas its damping factor was lower. The fluctuation in the frequency linewidth vs. resonance field in the frequency-sweep method is higher than that for the field-sweep.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":17848,"journal":{"name":"Kuwait Journal of Science","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2307410824000245/pdfft?md5=d7bd2d78dbef6e434acb9e0ceb6f6ca4&pid=1-s2.0-S2307410824000245-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison of field sweep and frequency sweep evaluations of Co–Ni ferrite nanoparticles in the short circuit FMR method\",\"authors\":\"Sadeq H. Lafta\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.kjs.2024.100199\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Broadband ferromagnetic resonance (BFMR) spectroscopy analysis can be achieved with different setups involving the frequency-sweep and field-sweep setups. To evaluate and compare the two former regimes, a frequency-sweep and a field-sweep shortcut BFMR regimes were conducted on Co–Ni ferrite nanoparticles that were synthesized by the co-precipitation method of metal chlorides. The nanoparticles were structurally and magnetically characterized, with an average particle size of around 23 nm and a spinel structure. The saturation magnetization was about 59 emu/g, and the coercivity was about 30 Oe. The BFMR analyses were achieved through a frequency range of (2–26) GHz and a field range of (0-10<sup>4</sup>)Oe. The two regimes, frequency sweep and field sweep, showed linear behavior between the resonance field and resonance frequency. The frequency–sweep regime displayed more complicated curves involving small multi-peaks within the multi-FMR absorption band that were not found in the field sweep regime. The intercepts of the linear dispersion relationship between the two regimes are nearly equivalent to each other. The field-sweep g-factor was higher and more reasonable than the frequency-sweep one, whereas its damping factor was lower. The fluctuation in the frequency linewidth vs. resonance field in the frequency-sweep method is higher than that for the field-sweep.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":17848,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Kuwait Journal of Science\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-02-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2307410824000245/pdfft?md5=d7bd2d78dbef6e434acb9e0ceb6f6ca4&pid=1-s2.0-S2307410824000245-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Kuwait Journal of Science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"103\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2307410824000245\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"综合性期刊\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Kuwait Journal of Science","FirstCategoryId":"103","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2307410824000245","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"综合性期刊","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

宽带铁磁共振(BFMR)光谱分析可以通过不同的设置来实现,包括频率扫描和场扫描设置。为了评估和比较前两种设置,我们对通过金属氯化物共沉淀法合成的钴镍铁氧体纳米粒子进行了频率扫描和场扫描捷径 BFMR 设置。这些纳米粒子具有平均粒径约为 23 nm 的尖晶石结构,其结构和磁性特征均已确定。饱和磁化率约为 59 emu/g,矫顽力约为 30 Oe。BFMR 分析的频率范围为 (2-26) GHz,磁场范围为 (0-104)Oe。频率扫描和磁场扫描这两种机制在共振磁场和共振频率之间呈现线性行为。频率扫描机制显示出更复杂的曲线,涉及多调频吸收带内的小多峰值,这在场扫描机制中没有发现。两种体制之间的线性分散关系的截距几乎相等。场扫描的 g 因子比频率扫描的 g 因子更高、更合理,而其阻尼因子则更低。频扫法的频率线宽对共振场的波动比场扫法大。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Comparison of field sweep and frequency sweep evaluations of Co–Ni ferrite nanoparticles in the short circuit FMR method

Broadband ferromagnetic resonance (BFMR) spectroscopy analysis can be achieved with different setups involving the frequency-sweep and field-sweep setups. To evaluate and compare the two former regimes, a frequency-sweep and a field-sweep shortcut BFMR regimes were conducted on Co–Ni ferrite nanoparticles that were synthesized by the co-precipitation method of metal chlorides. The nanoparticles were structurally and magnetically characterized, with an average particle size of around 23 nm and a spinel structure. The saturation magnetization was about 59 emu/g, and the coercivity was about 30 Oe. The BFMR analyses were achieved through a frequency range of (2–26) GHz and a field range of (0-104)Oe. The two regimes, frequency sweep and field sweep, showed linear behavior between the resonance field and resonance frequency. The frequency–sweep regime displayed more complicated curves involving small multi-peaks within the multi-FMR absorption band that were not found in the field sweep regime. The intercepts of the linear dispersion relationship between the two regimes are nearly equivalent to each other. The field-sweep g-factor was higher and more reasonable than the frequency-sweep one, whereas its damping factor was lower. The fluctuation in the frequency linewidth vs. resonance field in the frequency-sweep method is higher than that for the field-sweep.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Kuwait Journal of Science
Kuwait Journal of Science MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES-
CiteScore
1.60
自引率
28.60%
发文量
132
期刊介绍: Kuwait Journal of Science (KJS) is indexed and abstracted by major publishing houses such as Chemical Abstract, Science Citation Index, Current contents, Mathematics Abstract, Micribiological Abstracts etc. KJS publishes peer-review articles in various fields of Science including Mathematics, Computer Science, Physics, Statistics, Biology, Chemistry and Earth & Environmental Sciences. In addition, it also aims to bring the results of scientific research carried out under a variety of intellectual traditions and organizations to the attention of specialized scholarly readership. As such, the publisher expects the submission of original manuscripts which contain analysis and solutions about important theoretical, empirical and normative issues.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信