比较不同设备上推荐代理的有效性

IF 20.1 1区 管理学 Q1 INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE
Prashanth Ravula , Amit Bhatnagar , Subhash Jha
{"title":"比较不同设备上推荐代理的有效性","authors":"Prashanth Ravula ,&nbsp;Amit Bhatnagar ,&nbsp;Subhash Jha","doi":"10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2024.102758","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>This research empirically studies whether recommendation agents are as effective on newer, mobile devices (i.e., tablets, smartphones) as they are on older, stationary ones (i.e., desktop computers). We analyze clickstream data from Airbnb with a novel econometric model based on beta and logit regressions and estimated within the Bayesian framework. The model controls for self-selectivity bias. Our empirical findings show that recommendation agents are less effective on mobile devices; the number of recommended alternatives clicked by smartphone (desktop computer) users is smaller (larger) than that of tablet users. This is managerially important as we also show that a consumer’s purchase likelihood is directly related to the number of recommended alternatives evaluated by them. Furthermore, we found that men and younger consumers rely less on recommendation agents. Our results highlight the importance of redesigning recommendation agents for mobile devices as well as identifying consumer segments that need stronger incentives to shop online.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":48422,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Information Management","volume":"76 ","pages":"Article 102758"},"PeriodicalIF":20.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparing the effectiveness of recommendation agents across devices\",\"authors\":\"Prashanth Ravula ,&nbsp;Amit Bhatnagar ,&nbsp;Subhash Jha\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2024.102758\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>This research empirically studies whether recommendation agents are as effective on newer, mobile devices (i.e., tablets, smartphones) as they are on older, stationary ones (i.e., desktop computers). We analyze clickstream data from Airbnb with a novel econometric model based on beta and logit regressions and estimated within the Bayesian framework. The model controls for self-selectivity bias. Our empirical findings show that recommendation agents are less effective on mobile devices; the number of recommended alternatives clicked by smartphone (desktop computer) users is smaller (larger) than that of tablet users. This is managerially important as we also show that a consumer’s purchase likelihood is directly related to the number of recommended alternatives evaluated by them. Furthermore, we found that men and younger consumers rely less on recommendation agents. Our results highlight the importance of redesigning recommendation agents for mobile devices as well as identifying consumer segments that need stronger incentives to shop online.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48422,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Information Management\",\"volume\":\"76 \",\"pages\":\"Article 102758\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":20.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-02-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Information Management\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"91\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0268401224000069\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"管理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Information Management","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0268401224000069","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究从经验角度研究了推荐代理在较新的移动设备(即平板电脑和智能手机)上是否与在较旧的固定设备(即台式电脑)上一样有效。我们使用基于贝塔和对数回归的新型计量经济模型分析了 Airbnb 的点击流数据,并在贝叶斯框架内进行了估计。该模型控制了自我选择偏差。我们的实证研究结果表明,推荐代理在移动设备上的效果较差;智能手机(台式电脑)用户点击的推荐替代品数量少于(多于)平板电脑用户。这在管理上非常重要,因为我们还表明,消费者的购买可能性与他们评估的推荐替代品数量直接相关。此外,我们还发现男性和年轻消费者对推荐代理的依赖程度较低。我们的研究结果凸显了为移动设备重新设计推荐代理以及识别需要更强的网上购物激励的消费者群体的重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Comparing the effectiveness of recommendation agents across devices

This research empirically studies whether recommendation agents are as effective on newer, mobile devices (i.e., tablets, smartphones) as they are on older, stationary ones (i.e., desktop computers). We analyze clickstream data from Airbnb with a novel econometric model based on beta and logit regressions and estimated within the Bayesian framework. The model controls for self-selectivity bias. Our empirical findings show that recommendation agents are less effective on mobile devices; the number of recommended alternatives clicked by smartphone (desktop computer) users is smaller (larger) than that of tablet users. This is managerially important as we also show that a consumer’s purchase likelihood is directly related to the number of recommended alternatives evaluated by them. Furthermore, we found that men and younger consumers rely less on recommendation agents. Our results highlight the importance of redesigning recommendation agents for mobile devices as well as identifying consumer segments that need stronger incentives to shop online.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
International Journal of Information Management
International Journal of Information Management INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE-
CiteScore
53.10
自引率
6.20%
发文量
111
审稿时长
24 days
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Information Management (IJIM) is a distinguished, international, and peer-reviewed journal dedicated to providing its readers with top-notch analysis and discussions within the evolving field of information management. Key features of the journal include: Comprehensive Coverage: IJIM keeps readers informed with major papers, reports, and reviews. Topical Relevance: The journal remains current and relevant through Viewpoint articles and regular features like Research Notes, Case Studies, and a Reviews section, ensuring readers are updated on contemporary issues. Focus on Quality: IJIM prioritizes high-quality papers that address contemporary issues in information management.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信