COVID-19 大流行对 ICONA 队列中本地和移民艾滋病毒感染者继续接受护理的影响。

IF 6.3 3区 医学 Q1 INFECTIOUS DISEASES
Roberta Gagliardini , Andrea Giacomelli , Giorgio Bozzi , Antonella D'Arminio Monforte , Alessandro Tavelli , Valentina Mazzotta , Elena Bruzzesi , Adriana Cervo , Annalisa Saracino , Cristina Mussini , Enrico Girardi , Alessandro Cozzi-Lepri , Andrea Antinori , ICONA Foundation study group
{"title":"COVID-19 大流行对 ICONA 队列中本地和移民艾滋病毒感染者继续接受护理的影响。","authors":"Roberta Gagliardini ,&nbsp;Andrea Giacomelli ,&nbsp;Giorgio Bozzi ,&nbsp;Antonella D'Arminio Monforte ,&nbsp;Alessandro Tavelli ,&nbsp;Valentina Mazzotta ,&nbsp;Elena Bruzzesi ,&nbsp;Adriana Cervo ,&nbsp;Annalisa Saracino ,&nbsp;Cristina Mussini ,&nbsp;Enrico Girardi ,&nbsp;Alessandro Cozzi-Lepri ,&nbsp;Andrea Antinori ,&nbsp;ICONA Foundation study group","doi":"10.1016/j.tmaid.2024.102691","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>COVID-19 pandemic challenged the UNAIDS 90-90-90 targets. How the COVID-19 pandemic affected HIV retention in care and whether it has disproportionally affected migrant people with HIV (PWH) remained to be investigated.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>PWH in ICONA Cohort in follow-up in each of the study periods were included: 01/09/2019-29/02/2020 (pandemic period) and 01/03/2018-31/08/2018 (historical period, as a control). Risk of temporary loss to follow-up (LTFU, defined as no data recorded for a person for one year) was analyzed by logistic regression, with migrant status as the main exposure variable. Difference in difference (DID) analysis was applied to evaluate the effect of COVID-19 pandemic in the different risk of LTFU between natives and migrants.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>8864 (17.1% migrants) and 8071 (16.8% migrants) PWH constituted the pandemic and the historical period population, respectively.</p><p>Proportion of PWH defined as LTFU in the pandemic period was 10.5% in native and 19.6% in migrant PWH.</p><p>After controlling for age, sex and geographical location of enrolling site, risk of temporary LTFU was higher for migrants than native PWH [adjusted odds ratio 1.85 (95%CI 1.54–2.22)] in pandemic period. In PWH contributing to both periods, LTFU was 9.0% (95% CI 8.3–9.8) in natives vs 17.0% (95% CI 14.7–19.4) in migrants during the pandemic. Instead, LTFU was 1.2% (95%CI 0.9, 1.5) in natives vs 2.2% (95% CI 1.3–3.1) in migrants during the historical period, with a resulting DID of 7.0% (95% CI 4.4–9.6).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>A greater proportion of LTFU in migrant PWH was observed in both periods, which remained unaltered over time. Interventions to reduce LTFU of migrants are necessary.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":23312,"journal":{"name":"Travel Medicine and Infectious Disease","volume":"58 ","pages":"Article 102691"},"PeriodicalIF":6.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S147789392400005X/pdfft?md5=a8a01699f4e0c31b54be371f1f9c09d1&pid=1-s2.0-S147789392400005X-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Impact of COVID-19 pandemic on retention in care of native and migrant people with HIV in the ICONA cohort\",\"authors\":\"Roberta Gagliardini ,&nbsp;Andrea Giacomelli ,&nbsp;Giorgio Bozzi ,&nbsp;Antonella D'Arminio Monforte ,&nbsp;Alessandro Tavelli ,&nbsp;Valentina Mazzotta ,&nbsp;Elena Bruzzesi ,&nbsp;Adriana Cervo ,&nbsp;Annalisa Saracino ,&nbsp;Cristina Mussini ,&nbsp;Enrico Girardi ,&nbsp;Alessandro Cozzi-Lepri ,&nbsp;Andrea Antinori ,&nbsp;ICONA Foundation study group\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.tmaid.2024.102691\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>COVID-19 pandemic challenged the UNAIDS 90-90-90 targets. How the COVID-19 pandemic affected HIV retention in care and whether it has disproportionally affected migrant people with HIV (PWH) remained to be investigated.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>PWH in ICONA Cohort in follow-up in each of the study periods were included: 01/09/2019-29/02/2020 (pandemic period) and 01/03/2018-31/08/2018 (historical period, as a control). Risk of temporary loss to follow-up (LTFU, defined as no data recorded for a person for one year) was analyzed by logistic regression, with migrant status as the main exposure variable. Difference in difference (DID) analysis was applied to evaluate the effect of COVID-19 pandemic in the different risk of LTFU between natives and migrants.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>8864 (17.1% migrants) and 8071 (16.8% migrants) PWH constituted the pandemic and the historical period population, respectively.</p><p>Proportion of PWH defined as LTFU in the pandemic period was 10.5% in native and 19.6% in migrant PWH.</p><p>After controlling for age, sex and geographical location of enrolling site, risk of temporary LTFU was higher for migrants than native PWH [adjusted odds ratio 1.85 (95%CI 1.54–2.22)] in pandemic period. In PWH contributing to both periods, LTFU was 9.0% (95% CI 8.3–9.8) in natives vs 17.0% (95% CI 14.7–19.4) in migrants during the pandemic. Instead, LTFU was 1.2% (95%CI 0.9, 1.5) in natives vs 2.2% (95% CI 1.3–3.1) in migrants during the historical period, with a resulting DID of 7.0% (95% CI 4.4–9.6).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>A greater proportion of LTFU in migrant PWH was observed in both periods, which remained unaltered over time. Interventions to reduce LTFU of migrants are necessary.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":23312,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Travel Medicine and Infectious Disease\",\"volume\":\"58 \",\"pages\":\"Article 102691\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-02-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S147789392400005X/pdfft?md5=a8a01699f4e0c31b54be371f1f9c09d1&pid=1-s2.0-S147789392400005X-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Travel Medicine and Infectious Disease\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S147789392400005X\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"INFECTIOUS DISEASES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Travel Medicine and Infectious Disease","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S147789392400005X","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"INFECTIOUS DISEASES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:COVID-19 大流行对联合国艾滋病规划署的 90-90-90 目标提出了挑战。COVID-19大流行如何影响艾滋病患者继续接受护理,以及它是否对感染艾滋病毒的移民(PWH)产生了不成比例的影响,仍有待研究:方法:纳入在每个研究期间接受随访的 ICONA 队列中的 PWH:方法:纳入 ICONA 队列中在每个研究期间接受随访的感染者:01/09/2019-29/02/2020(大流行期)和 01/03/2018-31/08/2018(历史期,作为对照)。以移民身份为主要暴露变量,通过逻辑回归分析了暂时失去随访的风险(LTFU,定义为一年内无数据记录)。采用差异分析(DID)评估 COVID-19 大流行对本地人和移民之间不同的 LTFU 风险的影响:大流行和历史时期的人群中分别有 8864 名(17.1% 的移民)和 8071 名(16.8% 的移民)残疾人。在大流行时期,被定义为 "LTFU "的威迫症患者比例在本地威迫症患者中为 10.5%,在移民威迫症患者中为 19.6%。在控制了年龄、性别和登记地点的地理位置后,在大流行时期,外来务工人员发生暂时性LTFU的风险高于本地务工人员[调整后的几率比为1.85(95%CI为1.54-2.22)]。在大流行期间,在两个时期均有贡献的公共卫生人员中,本地人的 LTFU 为 9.0%(95% CI 8.3-9.8),而移民为 17.0%(95% CI 14.7-19.4)。相反,在历史时期,本地人的LTFU为1.2%(95%CI 0.9,1.5),而移民为2.2%(95%CI 1.3-3.1),因此DID为7.0%(95%CI 4.4-9.6):结论:在这两个时期均观察到移民威利斯人的LTFU比例较高,且随着时间的推移未发生变化。有必要采取干预措施以减少移民的LTFU。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Impact of COVID-19 pandemic on retention in care of native and migrant people with HIV in the ICONA cohort

Background

COVID-19 pandemic challenged the UNAIDS 90-90-90 targets. How the COVID-19 pandemic affected HIV retention in care and whether it has disproportionally affected migrant people with HIV (PWH) remained to be investigated.

Methods

PWH in ICONA Cohort in follow-up in each of the study periods were included: 01/09/2019-29/02/2020 (pandemic period) and 01/03/2018-31/08/2018 (historical period, as a control). Risk of temporary loss to follow-up (LTFU, defined as no data recorded for a person for one year) was analyzed by logistic regression, with migrant status as the main exposure variable. Difference in difference (DID) analysis was applied to evaluate the effect of COVID-19 pandemic in the different risk of LTFU between natives and migrants.

Results

8864 (17.1% migrants) and 8071 (16.8% migrants) PWH constituted the pandemic and the historical period population, respectively.

Proportion of PWH defined as LTFU in the pandemic period was 10.5% in native and 19.6% in migrant PWH.

After controlling for age, sex and geographical location of enrolling site, risk of temporary LTFU was higher for migrants than native PWH [adjusted odds ratio 1.85 (95%CI 1.54–2.22)] in pandemic period. In PWH contributing to both periods, LTFU was 9.0% (95% CI 8.3–9.8) in natives vs 17.0% (95% CI 14.7–19.4) in migrants during the pandemic. Instead, LTFU was 1.2% (95%CI 0.9, 1.5) in natives vs 2.2% (95% CI 1.3–3.1) in migrants during the historical period, with a resulting DID of 7.0% (95% CI 4.4–9.6).

Conclusions

A greater proportion of LTFU in migrant PWH was observed in both periods, which remained unaltered over time. Interventions to reduce LTFU of migrants are necessary.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Travel Medicine and Infectious Disease
Travel Medicine and Infectious Disease PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH-INFECTIOUS DISEASES
CiteScore
19.40
自引率
1.70%
发文量
211
审稿时长
49 days
期刊介绍: Travel Medicine and Infectious Disease Publication Scope: Publishes original papers, reviews, and consensus papers Primary theme: infectious disease in the context of travel medicine Focus Areas: Epidemiology and surveillance of travel-related illness Prevention and treatment of travel-associated infections Malaria prevention and treatment Travellers' diarrhoea Infections associated with mass gatherings Migration-related infections Vaccines and vaccine-preventable disease Global policy/regulations for disease prevention and control Practical clinical issues for travel and tropical medicine practitioners Coverage: Addresses areas of controversy and debate in travel medicine Aims to inform guidelines and policy pertinent to travel medicine and the prevention of infectious disease Publication Features: Offers a fast peer-review process Provides early online publication of accepted manuscripts Aims to publish cutting-edge papers
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信