与无肾脏清除功能增强的重症外科手术患者相比,患有菌血症且肾脏清除功能增强的重症外科手术患者按规范使用抗生素的临床效果。

IF 1.4 4区 医学 Q4 INFECTIOUS DISEASES
Surgical infections Pub Date : 2024-03-01 Epub Date: 2024-02-09 DOI:10.1089/sur.2023.204
Martin Gordon, Evan Lantz, Caleb Mentzer, Abigail Hall
{"title":"与无肾脏清除功能增强的重症外科手术患者相比,患有菌血症且肾脏清除功能增强的重症外科手术患者按规范使用抗生素的临床效果。","authors":"Martin Gordon, Evan Lantz, Caleb Mentzer, Abigail Hall","doi":"10.1089/sur.2023.204","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b><i>Background:</i></b> Augmented renal clearance (ARC) is a phenomenon observed in critically ill patients, leading to supraphysiologic drug clearance and concern for suboptimal antibiotic concentrations. The purpose of this study was to compare the clinical outcomes of our institutional protocolized antibiotic dosing regimen in critically ill patients with bacteremia and ARC compared with critically ill patients without ARC. <b><i>Patients and Methods:</i></b> We performed a retrospective study comparing the efficacy of an institutional protocolized antibiotic dosing regimen in critically ill patients with bacteremia and ARC compared with critically ill patients without ARC. The primary end point was in-hospital mortality. Secondary outcomes were intensive care unit (ICU) mortality, days requiring mechanical ventilation, ICU length of stay (LOS), hospital LOS, development of drug resistance to index antibiotic agent, and documented clearance of blood cultures within 72 hours. <b><i>Results:</i></b> There were 75 patients included in this study. Twenty percent of patients in the ARC group died in the hospital versus 31% in the non-ARC group (p = 0.26). The results for the ARC group versus the non-ARC group for the secondary outcomes of ICU mortality (20% vs. 26%; p = 0.56), ICU LOS (14.7 days vs. 7 days; p = 0.07), hospital LOS (28.3 days vs. 21.6 days; p = 0.03), days requiring mechanical ventilation (14 days vs. 12 days; p = 0.49), duration of antibiotic therapy (7.5 days vs. 9.0 days; p = 0.39), documented clearance of blood cultures within 72 hours (41% vs. 33%; p = 0.56), and the development of drug resistance to the index antibiotic agent (0% vs. 0%; p > 0.99) were also calculated. <b><i>Conclusions:</i></b> Among critically ill patients with bacteremia and ARC, there was no difference in in-hospital mortality compared with critically ill patients without ARC. There was a difference in hospital LOS, with a shorter duration of stay for the non-ARC group. There was no development of multi-drug-resistant organisms in either group.</p>","PeriodicalId":22109,"journal":{"name":"Surgical infections","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Clinical Outcomes of Protocolized Antibiotic Dosing in Critically Ill Surgical Patients With Bacteremia and Augmented Renal Clearance Compared With Critically Ill Surgical Patients Without Augmented Renal Clearance.\",\"authors\":\"Martin Gordon, Evan Lantz, Caleb Mentzer, Abigail Hall\",\"doi\":\"10.1089/sur.2023.204\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p><b><i>Background:</i></b> Augmented renal clearance (ARC) is a phenomenon observed in critically ill patients, leading to supraphysiologic drug clearance and concern for suboptimal antibiotic concentrations. The purpose of this study was to compare the clinical outcomes of our institutional protocolized antibiotic dosing regimen in critically ill patients with bacteremia and ARC compared with critically ill patients without ARC. <b><i>Patients and Methods:</i></b> We performed a retrospective study comparing the efficacy of an institutional protocolized antibiotic dosing regimen in critically ill patients with bacteremia and ARC compared with critically ill patients without ARC. The primary end point was in-hospital mortality. Secondary outcomes were intensive care unit (ICU) mortality, days requiring mechanical ventilation, ICU length of stay (LOS), hospital LOS, development of drug resistance to index antibiotic agent, and documented clearance of blood cultures within 72 hours. <b><i>Results:</i></b> There were 75 patients included in this study. Twenty percent of patients in the ARC group died in the hospital versus 31% in the non-ARC group (p = 0.26). The results for the ARC group versus the non-ARC group for the secondary outcomes of ICU mortality (20% vs. 26%; p = 0.56), ICU LOS (14.7 days vs. 7 days; p = 0.07), hospital LOS (28.3 days vs. 21.6 days; p = 0.03), days requiring mechanical ventilation (14 days vs. 12 days; p = 0.49), duration of antibiotic therapy (7.5 days vs. 9.0 days; p = 0.39), documented clearance of blood cultures within 72 hours (41% vs. 33%; p = 0.56), and the development of drug resistance to the index antibiotic agent (0% vs. 0%; p > 0.99) were also calculated. <b><i>Conclusions:</i></b> Among critically ill patients with bacteremia and ARC, there was no difference in in-hospital mortality compared with critically ill patients without ARC. There was a difference in hospital LOS, with a shorter duration of stay for the non-ARC group. There was no development of multi-drug-resistant organisms in either group.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":22109,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Surgical infections\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Surgical infections\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1089/sur.2023.204\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/2/9 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"INFECTIOUS DISEASES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Surgical infections","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1089/sur.2023.204","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/2/9 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"INFECTIOUS DISEASES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:肾清除率增高(ARC)是危重病人中观察到的一种现象,它导致超生理药物清除率,并引起对抗生素浓度不达标的担忧。本研究的目的是比较本院规定的抗生素给药方案对菌血症和 ARC 重症患者的临床疗效,并与无 ARC 的重症患者进行比较。患者和方法:我们进行了一项回顾性研究,比较了在患有菌血症和 ARC 的重症患者中采用机构规范化抗生素给药方案的疗效,并与未患有 ARC 的重症患者进行了比较。主要终点是院内死亡率。次要结果包括重症监护室(ICU)死亡率、需要机械通气的天数、重症监护室住院时间、住院时间、对指标抗生素产生耐药性的情况以及 72 小时内血培养清除记录。研究结果本研究共纳入 75 名患者。ARC 组中 20% 的患者在住院期间死亡,而非 ARC 组中 31% 的患者在住院期间死亡(P = 0.26)。在 ICU 死亡率(20% 对 26%;p = 0.56)、ICU LOS(14.7 天对 7 天;p = 0.07)、医院 LOS(28.3 天对 21.6 天;p = 0.03)、需要机械通气的天数(14 天对 12 天;p = 0.49)等次要结果中,ARC 组与非 ARC 组的结果相同。12 天;p = 0.49)、抗生素治疗持续时间(7.5 天 vs. 9.0 天;p = 0.39)、有记录的 72 小时内血培养清除率(41% vs. 33%;p = 0.56)以及对指标抗生素产生耐药性的情况(0% vs. 0%;p > 0.99)。结论在患有菌血症和 ARC 的重症患者中,院内死亡率与无 ARC 的重症患者相比没有差异。住院时间存在差异,无 ARC 组的住院时间更短。两组患者均未出现多重耐药菌。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Clinical Outcomes of Protocolized Antibiotic Dosing in Critically Ill Surgical Patients With Bacteremia and Augmented Renal Clearance Compared With Critically Ill Surgical Patients Without Augmented Renal Clearance.

Background: Augmented renal clearance (ARC) is a phenomenon observed in critically ill patients, leading to supraphysiologic drug clearance and concern for suboptimal antibiotic concentrations. The purpose of this study was to compare the clinical outcomes of our institutional protocolized antibiotic dosing regimen in critically ill patients with bacteremia and ARC compared with critically ill patients without ARC. Patients and Methods: We performed a retrospective study comparing the efficacy of an institutional protocolized antibiotic dosing regimen in critically ill patients with bacteremia and ARC compared with critically ill patients without ARC. The primary end point was in-hospital mortality. Secondary outcomes were intensive care unit (ICU) mortality, days requiring mechanical ventilation, ICU length of stay (LOS), hospital LOS, development of drug resistance to index antibiotic agent, and documented clearance of blood cultures within 72 hours. Results: There were 75 patients included in this study. Twenty percent of patients in the ARC group died in the hospital versus 31% in the non-ARC group (p = 0.26). The results for the ARC group versus the non-ARC group for the secondary outcomes of ICU mortality (20% vs. 26%; p = 0.56), ICU LOS (14.7 days vs. 7 days; p = 0.07), hospital LOS (28.3 days vs. 21.6 days; p = 0.03), days requiring mechanical ventilation (14 days vs. 12 days; p = 0.49), duration of antibiotic therapy (7.5 days vs. 9.0 days; p = 0.39), documented clearance of blood cultures within 72 hours (41% vs. 33%; p = 0.56), and the development of drug resistance to the index antibiotic agent (0% vs. 0%; p > 0.99) were also calculated. Conclusions: Among critically ill patients with bacteremia and ARC, there was no difference in in-hospital mortality compared with critically ill patients without ARC. There was a difference in hospital LOS, with a shorter duration of stay for the non-ARC group. There was no development of multi-drug-resistant organisms in either group.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Surgical infections
Surgical infections INFECTIOUS DISEASES-SURGERY
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
5.00%
发文量
127
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Surgical Infections provides comprehensive and authoritative information on the biology, prevention, and management of post-operative infections. Original articles cover the latest advancements, new therapeutic management strategies, and translational research that is being applied to improve clinical outcomes and successfully treat post-operative infections. Surgical Infections coverage includes: -Peritonitis and intra-abdominal infections- Surgical site infections- Pneumonia and other nosocomial infections- Cellular and humoral immunity- Biology of the host response- Organ dysfunction syndromes- Antibiotic use- Resistant and opportunistic pathogens- Epidemiology and prevention- The operating room environment- Diagnostic studies
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信