取消全膝关节置换术患者术后疼痛治疗方案中的缓释类阿片。

IF 1.6 4区 医学 Q2 NURSING
Anoush Kalachian DNP, APN, AGACNP-BC, PCCN, CCRN , Judith Barberio PhD, APN, ANP-BC, GNP-BC, PMGT-BC , Jill Cox PhD, APN-c, CWOCN
{"title":"取消全膝关节置换术患者术后疼痛治疗方案中的缓释类阿片。","authors":"Anoush Kalachian DNP, APN, AGACNP-BC, PCCN, CCRN ,&nbsp;Judith Barberio PhD, APN, ANP-BC, GNP-BC, PMGT-BC ,&nbsp;Jill Cox PhD, APN-c, CWOCN","doi":"10.1016/j.pmn.2023.12.016","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><p>To determine whether the elimination of extended release (ER) opioids in the multimodal medication regimen of total knee replacement (TKR) patients resulted in improved patient outcomes.</p></div><div><h3>Design</h3><p>Retrospective cohort quality improvement.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>This project utilizes a retrospective chart review to evaluate an institution's current postoperative pain<span> protocol. The outcomes of interest include mean hospital length of stay, discharge disposition, mean pain score, antiemetic use, mean opioid dose used, and number of opioid discharge prescriptions.</span></p></div><div><h3>Results, Conclusions, and Clinical Implications</h3><p>Sixty patients were reviewed with a mean age at 70 years for both the pre-protocol (n = 36) and post-protocol groups (n = 34). There was a reduction in antiemetic use, <em>t</em>(59) = 2.2, <em>p</em> = .03 and length of stay, <em>t</em>(58) = 1.0, <em>p</em> = .33, and more discharges to home than rehab, <em>x<sup>2</sup></em> = 60, <em>p</em><span><span> &lt; .001. All patients received 30 tablets of only one opioid prescription upon discharge with no refill, either oxycodone-IR (82%, n = 49), hydromorphone (5%, n = 3), or tramadol (12%, n = 7). The project, aimed to reduce opioid overprescription and overconsumption, has the potential to improve prescribing practices, promoting </span>patient safety<span> and healthcare quality by supporting the current guidelines that recommend against using ER opioids for the study population.</span></span></p></div>","PeriodicalId":19959,"journal":{"name":"Pain Management Nursing","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Eliminating Extended-Release Opioids from a Postoperative Pain Protocol for Total Knee Replacement Patients\",\"authors\":\"Anoush Kalachian DNP, APN, AGACNP-BC, PCCN, CCRN ,&nbsp;Judith Barberio PhD, APN, ANP-BC, GNP-BC, PMGT-BC ,&nbsp;Jill Cox PhD, APN-c, CWOCN\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.pmn.2023.12.016\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><p>To determine whether the elimination of extended release (ER) opioids in the multimodal medication regimen of total knee replacement (TKR) patients resulted in improved patient outcomes.</p></div><div><h3>Design</h3><p>Retrospective cohort quality improvement.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>This project utilizes a retrospective chart review to evaluate an institution's current postoperative pain<span> protocol. The outcomes of interest include mean hospital length of stay, discharge disposition, mean pain score, antiemetic use, mean opioid dose used, and number of opioid discharge prescriptions.</span></p></div><div><h3>Results, Conclusions, and Clinical Implications</h3><p>Sixty patients were reviewed with a mean age at 70 years for both the pre-protocol (n = 36) and post-protocol groups (n = 34). There was a reduction in antiemetic use, <em>t</em>(59) = 2.2, <em>p</em> = .03 and length of stay, <em>t</em>(58) = 1.0, <em>p</em> = .33, and more discharges to home than rehab, <em>x<sup>2</sup></em> = 60, <em>p</em><span><span> &lt; .001. All patients received 30 tablets of only one opioid prescription upon discharge with no refill, either oxycodone-IR (82%, n = 49), hydromorphone (5%, n = 3), or tramadol (12%, n = 7). The project, aimed to reduce opioid overprescription and overconsumption, has the potential to improve prescribing practices, promoting </span>patient safety<span> and healthcare quality by supporting the current guidelines that recommend against using ER opioids for the study population.</span></span></p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19959,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Pain Management Nursing\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Pain Management Nursing\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1524904223002539\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"NURSING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pain Management Nursing","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1524904223002539","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:确定在全膝关节置换术(TKR)患者的多模式用药方案中取消缓释阿片类药物是否会改善患者的治疗效果:设计:回顾性队列质量改进:方法:本项目利用回顾性病历审查来评估一家医疗机构当前的术后疼痛方案。相关结果包括平均住院时间、出院处置、平均疼痛评分、止吐药使用情况、阿片类药物平均使用剂量以及阿片类药物出院处方数量:对协议前组(36 人)和协议后组(34 人)的 60 名患者进行了复查,他们的平均年龄为 70 岁。止吐药用量减少,t(59) = 2.2,p = .03;住院时间缩短,t(58) = 1.0,p = .33;出院回家人数多于康复治疗人数,x2 = 60,p < .001。所有患者出院时都只领取了一种阿片类药物处方的 30 片药片,且没有续订,处方为羟考酮-IR(82%,n = 49)、氢吗啡酮(5%,n = 3)或曲马多(12%,n = 7)。该项目旨在减少阿片类药物的过量处方和过度消费,有可能改善处方实践,通过支持建议研究人群不要在急诊室使用阿片类药物的现行指南,促进患者安全和医疗质量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Eliminating Extended-Release Opioids from a Postoperative Pain Protocol for Total Knee Replacement Patients

Purpose

To determine whether the elimination of extended release (ER) opioids in the multimodal medication regimen of total knee replacement (TKR) patients resulted in improved patient outcomes.

Design

Retrospective cohort quality improvement.

Methods

This project utilizes a retrospective chart review to evaluate an institution's current postoperative pain protocol. The outcomes of interest include mean hospital length of stay, discharge disposition, mean pain score, antiemetic use, mean opioid dose used, and number of opioid discharge prescriptions.

Results, Conclusions, and Clinical Implications

Sixty patients were reviewed with a mean age at 70 years for both the pre-protocol (n = 36) and post-protocol groups (n = 34). There was a reduction in antiemetic use, t(59) = 2.2, p = .03 and length of stay, t(58) = 1.0, p = .33, and more discharges to home than rehab, x2 = 60, p < .001. All patients received 30 tablets of only one opioid prescription upon discharge with no refill, either oxycodone-IR (82%, n = 49), hydromorphone (5%, n = 3), or tramadol (12%, n = 7). The project, aimed to reduce opioid overprescription and overconsumption, has the potential to improve prescribing practices, promoting patient safety and healthcare quality by supporting the current guidelines that recommend against using ER opioids for the study population.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Pain Management Nursing
Pain Management Nursing 医学-护理
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
5.90%
发文量
187
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: This peer-reviewed journal offers a unique focus on the realm of pain management as it applies to nursing. Original and review articles from experts in the field offer key insights in the areas of clinical practice, advocacy, education, administration, and research. Additional features include practice guidelines and pharmacology updates.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信