家庭保健中预防感染做法的障碍和促进因素:范围审查和拟议实施框架

IF 1.8 Q3 INFECTIOUS DISEASES
Lisa Brockhaus, Nikita Sass, Niklaus D. Labhardt
{"title":"家庭保健中预防感染做法的障碍和促进因素:范围审查和拟议实施框架","authors":"Lisa Brockhaus,&nbsp;Nikita Sass,&nbsp;Niklaus D. Labhardt","doi":"10.1016/j.infpip.2024.100342","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Infection prevention and control (IPC) research has focused on the hospital setting, neglecting the rapidly expanding home healthcare (HHC) sector. Current infection prevention recommendations do not reflect the challenges specific to the HHC setting.</p><p>This scoping review considered any original studies reporting on barriers or facilitators to infection prevention practices in the context of HHC. Study characteristics were mapped, and a descriptive content analysis was performed. Based on the findings we propose a framework of eight HHC setting characteristics relevant to infection prevention implementation.</p><p>33 studies fulfilled the eligibility criteria. A majority of studies addressed sharps injury or blood and body fluid exposure prevention (<em>N</em>=15) and the majority were conducted in the United States (<em>N</em>=23). Study methodologies employed were surveys (<em>N</em>=18), qualitative (<em>N</em>=11), direct observation (<em>N</em>=7), and one interventional study. The HHC setting characteristics relevant to infection prevention implementation were: the care process in the patient's immediate environment; the need to bring equipment and materials into the home; the provision and financing of equipment and materials; the use of patient space and facilities; the unique position of and the expectations towards HHC providers; working alone with little support; the intermittent nature of care; the attitudes of HHC providers formed by their work circumstances.</p><p>Interventional studies generating higher-quality evidence for implementation are lacking. Furthermore, implementation of aseptic technique and the decontamination and reprocessing of equipment are poorly studied in the HHC setting and deserve more research interest. The proposed framework may guide future research and implementation work.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":33492,"journal":{"name":"Infection Prevention in Practice","volume":"6 1","pages":"Article 100342"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2590088924000064/pdfft?md5=27c0e772c26ad90630a848fcd3d6d70d&pid=1-s2.0-S2590088924000064-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Barriers and facilitators to infection prevention practices in home healthcare: a scoping review and proposed implementation framework\",\"authors\":\"Lisa Brockhaus,&nbsp;Nikita Sass,&nbsp;Niklaus D. Labhardt\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.infpip.2024.100342\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Infection prevention and control (IPC) research has focused on the hospital setting, neglecting the rapidly expanding home healthcare (HHC) sector. Current infection prevention recommendations do not reflect the challenges specific to the HHC setting.</p><p>This scoping review considered any original studies reporting on barriers or facilitators to infection prevention practices in the context of HHC. Study characteristics were mapped, and a descriptive content analysis was performed. Based on the findings we propose a framework of eight HHC setting characteristics relevant to infection prevention implementation.</p><p>33 studies fulfilled the eligibility criteria. A majority of studies addressed sharps injury or blood and body fluid exposure prevention (<em>N</em>=15) and the majority were conducted in the United States (<em>N</em>=23). Study methodologies employed were surveys (<em>N</em>=18), qualitative (<em>N</em>=11), direct observation (<em>N</em>=7), and one interventional study. The HHC setting characteristics relevant to infection prevention implementation were: the care process in the patient's immediate environment; the need to bring equipment and materials into the home; the provision and financing of equipment and materials; the use of patient space and facilities; the unique position of and the expectations towards HHC providers; working alone with little support; the intermittent nature of care; the attitudes of HHC providers formed by their work circumstances.</p><p>Interventional studies generating higher-quality evidence for implementation are lacking. Furthermore, implementation of aseptic technique and the decontamination and reprocessing of equipment are poorly studied in the HHC setting and deserve more research interest. The proposed framework may guide future research and implementation work.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":33492,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Infection Prevention in Practice\",\"volume\":\"6 1\",\"pages\":\"Article 100342\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-01-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2590088924000064/pdfft?md5=27c0e772c26ad90630a848fcd3d6d70d&pid=1-s2.0-S2590088924000064-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Infection Prevention in Practice\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2590088924000064\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"INFECTIOUS DISEASES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Infection Prevention in Practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2590088924000064","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"INFECTIOUS DISEASES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

感染预防与控制(IPC)研究主要集中在医院环境中,而忽视了快速发展的家庭医疗保健(HHC)领域。目前的感染预防建议并没有反映出家庭医疗保健环境所面临的特殊挑战。本范围界定综述考虑了所有报告家庭医疗保健环境中感染预防实践的障碍或促进因素的原创性研究。我们绘制了研究特征图,并进行了描述性内容分析。根据研究结果,我们提出了与实施感染预防相关的八种健康护理环境特征框架。大多数研究涉及利器伤害或血液和体液暴露预防(15 项),大多数研究在美国进行(23 项)。采用的研究方法包括调查(18 项)、定性(11 项)、直接观察(7 项)和一项干预研究。与实施感染预防相关的家庭健康中心环境特点包括:在患者的直接环境中进行护理过程;需要将设备和材料带入家中;设备和材料的提供和资助;患者空间和设施的使用;家庭健康中心提供者的独特地位和对其的期望;独自工作且几乎没有支持;护理的间歇性;家庭健康中心提供者因其工作环境而形成的态度。此外,对无菌技术的实施以及设备的净化和再处理在健康护理环境中的研究较少,值得更多研究关注。所提出的框架可为今后的研究和实施工作提供指导。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Barriers and facilitators to infection prevention practices in home healthcare: a scoping review and proposed implementation framework

Infection prevention and control (IPC) research has focused on the hospital setting, neglecting the rapidly expanding home healthcare (HHC) sector. Current infection prevention recommendations do not reflect the challenges specific to the HHC setting.

This scoping review considered any original studies reporting on barriers or facilitators to infection prevention practices in the context of HHC. Study characteristics were mapped, and a descriptive content analysis was performed. Based on the findings we propose a framework of eight HHC setting characteristics relevant to infection prevention implementation.

33 studies fulfilled the eligibility criteria. A majority of studies addressed sharps injury or blood and body fluid exposure prevention (N=15) and the majority were conducted in the United States (N=23). Study methodologies employed were surveys (N=18), qualitative (N=11), direct observation (N=7), and one interventional study. The HHC setting characteristics relevant to infection prevention implementation were: the care process in the patient's immediate environment; the need to bring equipment and materials into the home; the provision and financing of equipment and materials; the use of patient space and facilities; the unique position of and the expectations towards HHC providers; working alone with little support; the intermittent nature of care; the attitudes of HHC providers formed by their work circumstances.

Interventional studies generating higher-quality evidence for implementation are lacking. Furthermore, implementation of aseptic technique and the decontamination and reprocessing of equipment are poorly studied in the HHC setting and deserve more research interest. The proposed framework may guide future research and implementation work.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Infection Prevention in Practice
Infection Prevention in Practice Medicine-Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
58
审稿时长
61 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信