Chick chorioallantoic membrane: a valuable 3D in vivo model for screening nanoformulations for tumor antiangiogenic therapeutics.

Drug discovery is an extensive process. From identifying lead compounds to approval for clinical application, it goes through a sequence of labor-intensive in vitro, in vivo preclinical screening and clinical trials. Among thousands of drugs screened only a few get approval for clinical trials. Furthermore, these approved drugs are often discontinued due to systemic toxicity and comorbidity at clinically administered dosages. To overcome these limitations, nanoformulations have emerged as the most sought-after strategy to safely and effectively deliver drugs within tumors at therapeutic concentrations. Most importantly, the employment of suitably variable preclinical models is considered highly critical for the therapeutic evaluation of candidate drugs or their formulations. A review of literature from the past 10 years on antiangiogenic nanoformulations shows the employment of limited types of preclinical models mainly the 2-dimensional (2D) monolayer cell culture and murine models as the mainstay for drug uptake, toxicity and efficiency studies. To top it all, murine models are highly expensive, time-consuming and require expertise in handling them. The current review highlights the utilization of the age-old chicken chorioallantoic membrane (CAM), a well-defined angiogenic model in the investigation of antiangiogenic compounds and nanoformulations in an economic framework. For practical applicability, we have evaluated the CAM model to demonstrate the screening of antiangiogenic compounds and that tumor cells can be implanted onto developing CAM for growing xenografts by recruiting host endothelial and other cellular components. In addition, the exploitation of CAM tumor xenograft models for the evaluation of nanoparticle distribution has also been reinforced by demonstrating that intravenously administered iron oxide nanoparticles (IONPs) passively accumulate and exhibit intracellular as well as extracellular compartment accumulation in highly vascular xenografts. Finally, the ethical considerations, benefits, and drawbacks, of using CAM as an experimental model for testing potential therapeutics are also highlighted.