住院期间电子病历模块中重病对话标准化文档的混合方法分析。

Myrna Katalina Serna, Catherine Yoon, Julie Fiskio, Joshua R Lakin, Jeffrey L Schnipper, Anuj K Dalal
{"title":"住院期间电子病历模块中重病对话标准化文档的混合方法分析。","authors":"Myrna Katalina Serna, Catherine Yoon, Julie Fiskio, Joshua R Lakin, Jeffrey L Schnipper, Anuj K Dalal","doi":"10.1177/10499091241228269","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Analysis of documented Serious Illness Conversations (SICs) in the inpatient setting can help clinicians align management to address patient and caregiver needs.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a mixed methods analysis of the first instance of standardized documentation of a SIC within a structured module among hospitalized general medicine patients from 2018 to 2019. Percentage of documentations that included a description of patient or family understanding of the patient's medical condition and use of radio buttons to answer the \"prognostic information shared,\" \"hopes,\" and \"worries\" modules are reported. Using grounded theory approach, physicians analyzed free text entries to: \"What is important to the patient/family?\" and \"Recommendations or next steps planned.\"</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Out of 5142 patients, 59 patients had a documented SIC. Patient or family understanding of the medical condition(s) was reported in 56 (95%). For \"prognostic information shared,\" the most frequently selected radio buttons were: 49 (83%) incurable disease and 28 (48%) prognosis of weeks to months while those for \"hopes\" were: 52 (88%) be comfortable and 27 (46%) be at home and for \"worries\" were: 49 (83%) other physical suffering and 36 (61%) pain. Themes generated from entries to \"What's important to patient/family?\" included being with loved ones; comfort; mentally and physically present; and reliable care while those for \"Recommendations\" were coordinating support services; symptom management; and support and communication.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>SIC content indicated concern about pain and reliable care suggesting the complex, intensive nature of caring for seriously ill patients and the need to consider SICs earlier in the life course of patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":94222,"journal":{"name":"The American journal of hospice & palliative care","volume":" ","pages":"14-19"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11566069/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Mixed Methods Analysis of Standardized Documentation of Serious Illness Conversations Within an Electronic Health Record Module During Hospitalization.\",\"authors\":\"Myrna Katalina Serna, Catherine Yoon, Julie Fiskio, Joshua R Lakin, Jeffrey L Schnipper, Anuj K Dalal\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/10499091241228269\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Analysis of documented Serious Illness Conversations (SICs) in the inpatient setting can help clinicians align management to address patient and caregiver needs.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a mixed methods analysis of the first instance of standardized documentation of a SIC within a structured module among hospitalized general medicine patients from 2018 to 2019. Percentage of documentations that included a description of patient or family understanding of the patient's medical condition and use of radio buttons to answer the \\\"prognostic information shared,\\\" \\\"hopes,\\\" and \\\"worries\\\" modules are reported. Using grounded theory approach, physicians analyzed free text entries to: \\\"What is important to the patient/family?\\\" and \\\"Recommendations or next steps planned.\\\"</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Out of 5142 patients, 59 patients had a documented SIC. Patient or family understanding of the medical condition(s) was reported in 56 (95%). For \\\"prognostic information shared,\\\" the most frequently selected radio buttons were: 49 (83%) incurable disease and 28 (48%) prognosis of weeks to months while those for \\\"hopes\\\" were: 52 (88%) be comfortable and 27 (46%) be at home and for \\\"worries\\\" were: 49 (83%) other physical suffering and 36 (61%) pain. Themes generated from entries to \\\"What's important to patient/family?\\\" included being with loved ones; comfort; mentally and physically present; and reliable care while those for \\\"Recommendations\\\" were coordinating support services; symptom management; and support and communication.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>SIC content indicated concern about pain and reliable care suggesting the complex, intensive nature of caring for seriously ill patients and the need to consider SICs earlier in the life course of patients.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":94222,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The American journal of hospice & palliative care\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"14-19\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11566069/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The American journal of hospice & palliative care\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/10499091241228269\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/2/9 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The American journal of hospice & palliative care","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/10499091241228269","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/2/9 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:对住院环境中记录的严重疾病对话(SIC)进行分析,有助于临床医生针对患者和护理人员的需求调整管理:分析住院环境中记录的严重疾病对话(SIC)可帮助临床医生调整管理,以满足患者和护理人员的需求:我们对 2018 年至 2019 年住院全科患者在结构化模块中首次标准化记录 SIC 的情况进行了混合方法分析。报告了包括描述患者或家属对患者病情的理解以及使用单选按钮回答 "预后信息共享"、"希望 "和 "担忧 "模块的记录百分比。使用基础理论方法,医生对以下自由文本条目进行了分析:"结果:在 5142 名患者中,有 59 名患者有 SIC 记录。56名患者(95%)报告了患者或家属对病情的理解。对于 "共享预后信息",最常选择的单选按钮是49人(83%)选择 "不治之症",28人(48%)选择 "几周到几个月的预后":52(88%)舒适和 27(46%)在家,而 "担心 "则是49人(83%)身体遭受其他痛苦,36人(61%)疼痛。对病人/家属来说什么最重要?"的主题包括与亲人在一起、舒适、精神和身体上的存在以及可靠的护理,而 "建议 "的主题包括协调支持服务、症状管理以及支持和沟通:SIC的内容显示了对疼痛和可靠护理的关注,这说明重症患者的护理工作复杂而繁重,需要在患者生命早期就考虑SIC。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A Mixed Methods Analysis of Standardized Documentation of Serious Illness Conversations Within an Electronic Health Record Module During Hospitalization.

Background: Analysis of documented Serious Illness Conversations (SICs) in the inpatient setting can help clinicians align management to address patient and caregiver needs.

Methods: We conducted a mixed methods analysis of the first instance of standardized documentation of a SIC within a structured module among hospitalized general medicine patients from 2018 to 2019. Percentage of documentations that included a description of patient or family understanding of the patient's medical condition and use of radio buttons to answer the "prognostic information shared," "hopes," and "worries" modules are reported. Using grounded theory approach, physicians analyzed free text entries to: "What is important to the patient/family?" and "Recommendations or next steps planned."

Results: Out of 5142 patients, 59 patients had a documented SIC. Patient or family understanding of the medical condition(s) was reported in 56 (95%). For "prognostic information shared," the most frequently selected radio buttons were: 49 (83%) incurable disease and 28 (48%) prognosis of weeks to months while those for "hopes" were: 52 (88%) be comfortable and 27 (46%) be at home and for "worries" were: 49 (83%) other physical suffering and 36 (61%) pain. Themes generated from entries to "What's important to patient/family?" included being with loved ones; comfort; mentally and physically present; and reliable care while those for "Recommendations" were coordinating support services; symptom management; and support and communication.

Conclusions: SIC content indicated concern about pain and reliable care suggesting the complex, intensive nature of caring for seriously ill patients and the need to consider SICs earlier in the life course of patients.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信