同伴教育对血液透析患者坚持治疗的影响:随机对照试验

IF 16.4 1区 化学 Q1 CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Accounts of Chemical Research Pub Date : 2024-01-09 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.4103/ijnmr.ijnmr_155_22
Alireza Irajpour, Maryam Sadat Hashemi, Parvaneh Abazari, Shahrazad Shahidi
{"title":"同伴教育对血液透析患者坚持治疗的影响:随机对照试验","authors":"Alireza Irajpour, Maryam Sadat Hashemi, Parvaneh Abazari, Shahrazad Shahidi","doi":"10.4103/ijnmr.ijnmr_155_22","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Non-adherence to treatments increases the rates of hemodialysis complications, hospitalization, and mortality. One strategy for adherence improvement is peer education. This study aimed to investigate the effects of peer education on treatment adherence among patients receiving hemodialysis.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>This was a randomized controlled trial. Patients in the control group were provided just with routine care, and the intervention group received peer education. Treatment adherence was assessed both before and after the intervention via the End-Stage Renal Disease (ESRD) Adherence Questionnaire. Data analysis was conducted by the Chi-square, the Mann-Whitney U, the paired-sample <i>t</i>, and the independent-sample <i>t</i> tests.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There were no significant between-group differences in terms of the pre-test mean scores of Adherence to regular attendance at hemodialysis sessions (t = 0.19, <i>p</i> = 0.85), Adherence to the prescribed medications (t = 0.46, <i>p</i> = 0.64), and Adherence to fluid restrictions (t = 0.24, <i>p</i> = 0.81). The same finding was observed after the intervention, except for the mean score of the adherence to fluid restrictions dimension which was significantly greater in the intervention group (t = 2.86, <i>p</i> = 0.006). Moreover, no significant changes were observed in the mean scores of treatment adherence dimensions in the control group. However, in the intervention group, the mean scores of the adherence to regular attendance at hemodialysis sessions (t = 3.79, <i>p</i> < 0.001) and the adherence to fluid restrictions dimensions were significantly greater than their pre-test values (t = 4.47, <i>p</i> < 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Education by peer groups improves the compliance of patients with regard to the consumption of fluids in the interval between two dialysis sessions.</p>","PeriodicalId":1,"journal":{"name":"Accounts of Chemical Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":16.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10849281/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Effects of Peer Education on Treatment Adherence among Patients Receiving Hemodialysis: A Randomized Controlled Trial.\",\"authors\":\"Alireza Irajpour, Maryam Sadat Hashemi, Parvaneh Abazari, Shahrazad Shahidi\",\"doi\":\"10.4103/ijnmr.ijnmr_155_22\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Non-adherence to treatments increases the rates of hemodialysis complications, hospitalization, and mortality. One strategy for adherence improvement is peer education. This study aimed to investigate the effects of peer education on treatment adherence among patients receiving hemodialysis.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>This was a randomized controlled trial. Patients in the control group were provided just with routine care, and the intervention group received peer education. Treatment adherence was assessed both before and after the intervention via the End-Stage Renal Disease (ESRD) Adherence Questionnaire. Data analysis was conducted by the Chi-square, the Mann-Whitney U, the paired-sample <i>t</i>, and the independent-sample <i>t</i> tests.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There were no significant between-group differences in terms of the pre-test mean scores of Adherence to regular attendance at hemodialysis sessions (t = 0.19, <i>p</i> = 0.85), Adherence to the prescribed medications (t = 0.46, <i>p</i> = 0.64), and Adherence to fluid restrictions (t = 0.24, <i>p</i> = 0.81). The same finding was observed after the intervention, except for the mean score of the adherence to fluid restrictions dimension which was significantly greater in the intervention group (t = 2.86, <i>p</i> = 0.006). Moreover, no significant changes were observed in the mean scores of treatment adherence dimensions in the control group. However, in the intervention group, the mean scores of the adherence to regular attendance at hemodialysis sessions (t = 3.79, <i>p</i> < 0.001) and the adherence to fluid restrictions dimensions were significantly greater than their pre-test values (t = 4.47, <i>p</i> < 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Education by peer groups improves the compliance of patients with regard to the consumption of fluids in the interval between two dialysis sessions.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":1,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Accounts of Chemical Research\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":16.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-01-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10849281/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Accounts of Chemical Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4103/ijnmr.ijnmr_155_22\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"化学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Accounts of Chemical Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/ijnmr.ijnmr_155_22","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"化学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:不坚持治疗会增加血液透析并发症、住院率和死亡率。同伴教育是提高治疗依从性的策略之一。本研究旨在调查同伴教育对血液透析患者坚持治疗的影响:这是一项随机对照试验。对照组患者只接受常规护理,干预组患者接受同伴教育。通过终末期肾病(ESRD)依从性问卷对干预前后的治疗依从性进行评估。数据分析采用卡方检验(Chi-square)、曼-惠特尼U检验(Mann-Whitney U)、配对样本t检验(paired-sample t)和独立样本t检验(independent-sample t):结果:在坚持定期参加血液透析疗程(t = 0.19,p = 0.85)、坚持遵医嘱用药(t = 0.46,p = 0.64)和坚持限制输液(t = 0.24,p = 0.81)的测试前平均得分方面,组间差异不明显。干预后也观察到了同样的结果,只是干预组在遵守液体限制维度上的平均得分明显更高(t = 2.86,p = 0.006)。此外,对照组在治疗依从性维度的平均得分上没有观察到明显变化。然而,在干预组中,坚持定期参加血液透析疗程(t = 3.79,p < 0.001)和坚持液体限制(t = 4.47,p < 0.001)的平均得分明显高于测试前的数值:同龄人群体的教育提高了患者对两次透析间隔期间液体消耗的依从性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The Effects of Peer Education on Treatment Adherence among Patients Receiving Hemodialysis: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

Background: Non-adherence to treatments increases the rates of hemodialysis complications, hospitalization, and mortality. One strategy for adherence improvement is peer education. This study aimed to investigate the effects of peer education on treatment adherence among patients receiving hemodialysis.

Materials and methods: This was a randomized controlled trial. Patients in the control group were provided just with routine care, and the intervention group received peer education. Treatment adherence was assessed both before and after the intervention via the End-Stage Renal Disease (ESRD) Adherence Questionnaire. Data analysis was conducted by the Chi-square, the Mann-Whitney U, the paired-sample t, and the independent-sample t tests.

Results: There were no significant between-group differences in terms of the pre-test mean scores of Adherence to regular attendance at hemodialysis sessions (t = 0.19, p = 0.85), Adherence to the prescribed medications (t = 0.46, p = 0.64), and Adherence to fluid restrictions (t = 0.24, p = 0.81). The same finding was observed after the intervention, except for the mean score of the adherence to fluid restrictions dimension which was significantly greater in the intervention group (t = 2.86, p = 0.006). Moreover, no significant changes were observed in the mean scores of treatment adherence dimensions in the control group. However, in the intervention group, the mean scores of the adherence to regular attendance at hemodialysis sessions (t = 3.79, p < 0.001) and the adherence to fluid restrictions dimensions were significantly greater than their pre-test values (t = 4.47, p < 0.001).

Conclusions: Education by peer groups improves the compliance of patients with regard to the consumption of fluids in the interval between two dialysis sessions.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Accounts of Chemical Research
Accounts of Chemical Research 化学-化学综合
CiteScore
31.40
自引率
1.10%
发文量
312
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: Accounts of Chemical Research presents short, concise and critical articles offering easy-to-read overviews of basic research and applications in all areas of chemistry and biochemistry. These short reviews focus on research from the author’s own laboratory and are designed to teach the reader about a research project. In addition, Accounts of Chemical Research publishes commentaries that give an informed opinion on a current research problem. Special Issues online are devoted to a single topic of unusual activity and significance. Accounts of Chemical Research replaces the traditional article abstract with an article "Conspectus." These entries synopsize the research affording the reader a closer look at the content and significance of an article. Through this provision of a more detailed description of the article contents, the Conspectus enhances the article's discoverability by search engines and the exposure for the research.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信