Leonard Ho PhD , Carys Pugh PhD , Sohan Seth PhD , Stella Arakelyan PhD , Nazir I Lone PhD , Marcus J Lyall PhD , Atul Anand PhD , Prof Jacques D Fleuriot PhD , Paola Galdi PhD , Prof Bruce Guthrie PhD
{"title":"预测老年人 1 年至 3 年死亡率模型的性能:外部验证模型的系统回顾。","authors":"Leonard Ho PhD , Carys Pugh PhD , Sohan Seth PhD , Stella Arakelyan PhD , Nazir I Lone PhD , Marcus J Lyall PhD , Atul Anand PhD , Prof Jacques D Fleuriot PhD , Paola Galdi PhD , Prof Bruce Guthrie PhD","doi":"10.1016/S2666-7568(23)00264-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Mortality prediction models support identifying older adults with short life expectancy for whom clinical care might need modifications. We systematically reviewed external validations of mortality prediction models in older adults (ie, aged 65 years and older) with up to 3 years of follow-up. In March, 2023, we conducted a literature search resulting in 36 studies reporting 74 validations of 64 unique models. Model applicability was fair but validation risk of bias was mostly high, with 50 (68%) of 74 validations not reporting calibration. Morbidities (most commonly cardiovascular diseases) were used as predictors by 45 (70%) of 64 of models. For 1-year prediction, 31 (67%) of 46 models had acceptable discrimination, but only one had excellent performance. Models with more than 20 predictors were more likely to have acceptable discrimination (risk ratio [RR] <em>vs</em> <10 predictors 1·68, 95% CI 1·06–2·66), as were models including sex (RR 1·75, 95% CI 1·12–2·73) or predicting risk during comprehensive geriatric assessment (RR 1·86, 95% CI 1·12–3·07). Development and validation of better-performing mortality prediction models in older people are needed.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":34394,"journal":{"name":"Lancet Healthy Longevity","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":13.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666756823002647/pdfft?md5=9760cd5b6ae5544df0ba50f7b55ff511&pid=1-s2.0-S2666756823002647-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Performance of models for predicting 1-year to 3-year mortality in older adults: a systematic review of externally validated models\",\"authors\":\"Leonard Ho PhD , Carys Pugh PhD , Sohan Seth PhD , Stella Arakelyan PhD , Nazir I Lone PhD , Marcus J Lyall PhD , Atul Anand PhD , Prof Jacques D Fleuriot PhD , Paola Galdi PhD , Prof Bruce Guthrie PhD\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/S2666-7568(23)00264-7\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Mortality prediction models support identifying older adults with short life expectancy for whom clinical care might need modifications. We systematically reviewed external validations of mortality prediction models in older adults (ie, aged 65 years and older) with up to 3 years of follow-up. In March, 2023, we conducted a literature search resulting in 36 studies reporting 74 validations of 64 unique models. Model applicability was fair but validation risk of bias was mostly high, with 50 (68%) of 74 validations not reporting calibration. Morbidities (most commonly cardiovascular diseases) were used as predictors by 45 (70%) of 64 of models. For 1-year prediction, 31 (67%) of 46 models had acceptable discrimination, but only one had excellent performance. Models with more than 20 predictors were more likely to have acceptable discrimination (risk ratio [RR] <em>vs</em> <10 predictors 1·68, 95% CI 1·06–2·66), as were models including sex (RR 1·75, 95% CI 1·12–2·73) or predicting risk during comprehensive geriatric assessment (RR 1·86, 95% CI 1·12–3·07). Development and validation of better-performing mortality prediction models in older people are needed.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":34394,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Lancet Healthy Longevity\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":13.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666756823002647/pdfft?md5=9760cd5b6ae5544df0ba50f7b55ff511&pid=1-s2.0-S2666756823002647-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Lancet Healthy Longevity\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666756823002647\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Lancet Healthy Longevity","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666756823002647","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Performance of models for predicting 1-year to 3-year mortality in older adults: a systematic review of externally validated models
Mortality prediction models support identifying older adults with short life expectancy for whom clinical care might need modifications. We systematically reviewed external validations of mortality prediction models in older adults (ie, aged 65 years and older) with up to 3 years of follow-up. In March, 2023, we conducted a literature search resulting in 36 studies reporting 74 validations of 64 unique models. Model applicability was fair but validation risk of bias was mostly high, with 50 (68%) of 74 validations not reporting calibration. Morbidities (most commonly cardiovascular diseases) were used as predictors by 45 (70%) of 64 of models. For 1-year prediction, 31 (67%) of 46 models had acceptable discrimination, but only one had excellent performance. Models with more than 20 predictors were more likely to have acceptable discrimination (risk ratio [RR] vs <10 predictors 1·68, 95% CI 1·06–2·66), as were models including sex (RR 1·75, 95% CI 1·12–2·73) or predicting risk during comprehensive geriatric assessment (RR 1·86, 95% CI 1·12–3·07). Development and validation of better-performing mortality prediction models in older people are needed.
期刊介绍:
The Lancet Healthy Longevity, a gold open-access journal, focuses on clinically-relevant longevity and healthy aging research. It covers early-stage clinical research on aging mechanisms, epidemiological studies, and societal research on changing populations. The journal includes clinical trials across disciplines, particularly in gerontology and age-specific clinical guidelines. In line with the Lancet family tradition, it advocates for the rights of all to healthy lives, emphasizing original research likely to impact clinical practice or thinking. Clinical and policy reviews also contribute to shaping the discourse in this rapidly growing discipline.