中药注射剂作为宫颈癌辅助疗法在中国患者中的疗效和安全性比较:一项网络荟萃分析。

IF 3.9 3区 医学 Q1 MEDICAL LABORATORY TECHNOLOGY
Pharmaceutical Biology Pub Date : 2024-12-01 Epub Date: 2024-02-09 DOI:10.1080/13880209.2024.2312217
Fei Ma, Qun Wang, Di Zhang, Zihong Wang, Hui Xie, Xianghong Liu, Hongxing Zhang, Haiyan Song, Shiguang Sun
{"title":"中药注射剂作为宫颈癌辅助疗法在中国患者中的疗效和安全性比较:一项网络荟萃分析。","authors":"Fei Ma, Qun Wang, Di Zhang, Zihong Wang, Hui Xie, Xianghong Liu, Hongxing Zhang, Haiyan Song, Shiguang Sun","doi":"10.1080/13880209.2024.2312217","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Context: </strong>Chinese medicine injections (CMIs) are widely used as adjuvant therapy for cervical cancer in China. However, the effectiveness of different types of CMIs remains uncertain.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To assess the effectiveness and safety of CMIs when used in conjunction with radiotherapy (RT) or concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT), particularly in combination with cisplatin (DDP), docetaxel plus cisplatin (DP), and paclitaxel plus cisplatin (TP).</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) were searched in databases including CNKI, WanFang, VIP, SinoMed, PubMed, Cochrane Library, Embase, and Web of Science from inception to September 2023. We calculated the risk ratio with a 95% confidence interval and the surface under the cumulative ranking area curve (SUCRA) for the clinical efficacy rate (CER), the efficacy rate by Karnofsky Performance Status (KPS), and the rates of leukopenia reduction (LRR) and gastrointestinal reactions (GRR).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Forty-seven RCTs were included, including nine CMI types: <i>Aidi</i>, <i>Fufangkushen</i>, <i>Huangqi</i>, <i>Kangai</i> (KA), <i>Kanglaite</i> (KLT), <i>Renshenduotang</i>, <i>Shenqifuzheng</i> (SQFZ), <i>Shenmai</i> (SM), and <i>Yadanzi</i>. KLT and KA were likely optimal choices with radiotherapy for CER and KPS, respectively. KA and KLT were optimal choices with RT + DDP for CER and GRR, respectively. KLT was the likely optimal choice with RT + DP for CER and KA for both KPS and GRR. SM and SQFZ were the likely optimal choices with RT + TP for CER and LRR, respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The optimal recommendation depends on whether CMIs are used with radiotherapy or concurrent chemoradiotherapy. More high-quality RCTs are needed to confirm further and update the existing evidence.</p>","PeriodicalId":19942,"journal":{"name":"Pharmaceutical Biology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10860435/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparative efficacy and safety of Chinese medicine injections as an adjunctive therapy for cervical cancer in Chinese patients: a network meta-analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Fei Ma, Qun Wang, Di Zhang, Zihong Wang, Hui Xie, Xianghong Liu, Hongxing Zhang, Haiyan Song, Shiguang Sun\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/13880209.2024.2312217\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Context: </strong>Chinese medicine injections (CMIs) are widely used as adjuvant therapy for cervical cancer in China. However, the effectiveness of different types of CMIs remains uncertain.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To assess the effectiveness and safety of CMIs when used in conjunction with radiotherapy (RT) or concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT), particularly in combination with cisplatin (DDP), docetaxel plus cisplatin (DP), and paclitaxel plus cisplatin (TP).</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) were searched in databases including CNKI, WanFang, VIP, SinoMed, PubMed, Cochrane Library, Embase, and Web of Science from inception to September 2023. We calculated the risk ratio with a 95% confidence interval and the surface under the cumulative ranking area curve (SUCRA) for the clinical efficacy rate (CER), the efficacy rate by Karnofsky Performance Status (KPS), and the rates of leukopenia reduction (LRR) and gastrointestinal reactions (GRR).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Forty-seven RCTs were included, including nine CMI types: <i>Aidi</i>, <i>Fufangkushen</i>, <i>Huangqi</i>, <i>Kangai</i> (KA), <i>Kanglaite</i> (KLT), <i>Renshenduotang</i>, <i>Shenqifuzheng</i> (SQFZ), <i>Shenmai</i> (SM), and <i>Yadanzi</i>. KLT and KA were likely optimal choices with radiotherapy for CER and KPS, respectively. KA and KLT were optimal choices with RT + DDP for CER and GRR, respectively. KLT was the likely optimal choice with RT + DP for CER and KA for both KPS and GRR. SM and SQFZ were the likely optimal choices with RT + TP for CER and LRR, respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The optimal recommendation depends on whether CMIs are used with radiotherapy or concurrent chemoradiotherapy. More high-quality RCTs are needed to confirm further and update the existing evidence.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19942,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Pharmaceutical Biology\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10860435/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Pharmaceutical Biology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/13880209.2024.2312217\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/2/9 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICAL LABORATORY TECHNOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pharmaceutical Biology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/13880209.2024.2312217","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/2/9 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICAL LABORATORY TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:在中国,中药注射剂被广泛用于宫颈癌的辅助治疗。然而,不同类型中药注射剂的有效性仍不确定:目的:评估中药注射液与放疗或同步化学放疗(CCRT)联合使用的有效性和安全性,尤其是与顺铂(DDP)、多西他赛加顺铂(DP)和紫杉醇加顺铂(TP)联合使用时的有效性和安全性:从开始到 2023 年 9 月,在 CNKI、万方、VIP、SinoMed、PubMed、Cochrane Library、Embase 和 Web of Science 等数据库中检索了随机对照试验(RCT)。我们计算了临床有效率(CER)、按卡诺夫斯基表现状态(KPS)计算的有效率、白细胞减少率(LRR)和胃肠道反应率(GRR)的风险比(95%置信区间)和累积排名面积曲线下表面(SUCRA):结果:共纳入 47 项 RCT,包括 9 种 CMI 类型:艾迪(Aidi)、复方苦参(Fufangkushen)、黄芪(Huangqi)、康艾(Kangai,KA)、康莱特(Kanglaite,KLT)、仁心堂(Renshenduotang)、神曲扶正(Shenqifuzheng,SQFZ)、神麦(Shenmai,SM)和雅丹子(Yadanzi)。KLT和KA可能分别是CER和KPS放疗的最佳选择。对于 CER 和 GRR,KA 和 KLT 分别是 RT + DDP 的最佳选择。KLT可能是对CER进行RT+DDP治疗的最佳选择,而KA则是对KPS和GRR进行RT+DDP治疗的最佳选择。对于 CER 和 LRR,SM 和 SQFZ 分别是 RT + TP 的最佳选择:最佳推荐方案取决于CMI是与放疗一起使用还是同时进行化放疗。需要更多高质量的 RCT 来进一步确认和更新现有证据。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Comparative efficacy and safety of Chinese medicine injections as an adjunctive therapy for cervical cancer in Chinese patients: a network meta-analysis.

Context: Chinese medicine injections (CMIs) are widely used as adjuvant therapy for cervical cancer in China. However, the effectiveness of different types of CMIs remains uncertain.

Objective: To assess the effectiveness and safety of CMIs when used in conjunction with radiotherapy (RT) or concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT), particularly in combination with cisplatin (DDP), docetaxel plus cisplatin (DP), and paclitaxel plus cisplatin (TP).

Materials and methods: Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) were searched in databases including CNKI, WanFang, VIP, SinoMed, PubMed, Cochrane Library, Embase, and Web of Science from inception to September 2023. We calculated the risk ratio with a 95% confidence interval and the surface under the cumulative ranking area curve (SUCRA) for the clinical efficacy rate (CER), the efficacy rate by Karnofsky Performance Status (KPS), and the rates of leukopenia reduction (LRR) and gastrointestinal reactions (GRR).

Results: Forty-seven RCTs were included, including nine CMI types: Aidi, Fufangkushen, Huangqi, Kangai (KA), Kanglaite (KLT), Renshenduotang, Shenqifuzheng (SQFZ), Shenmai (SM), and Yadanzi. KLT and KA were likely optimal choices with radiotherapy for CER and KPS, respectively. KA and KLT were optimal choices with RT + DDP for CER and GRR, respectively. KLT was the likely optimal choice with RT + DP for CER and KA for both KPS and GRR. SM and SQFZ were the likely optimal choices with RT + TP for CER and LRR, respectively.

Conclusions: The optimal recommendation depends on whether CMIs are used with radiotherapy or concurrent chemoradiotherapy. More high-quality RCTs are needed to confirm further and update the existing evidence.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Pharmaceutical Biology
Pharmaceutical Biology 医学-药学
CiteScore
6.70
自引率
2.60%
发文量
191
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: Pharmaceutical Biology will publish manuscripts describing the discovery, methods for discovery, description, analysis characterization, and production/isolation (including sources and surveys) of biologically-active chemicals or other substances, drugs, pharmaceutical products, or preparations utilized in systems of traditional medicine. Topics may generally encompass any facet of natural product research related to pharmaceutical biology. Papers dealing with agents or topics related to natural product drugs are also appropriate (e.g., semi-synthetic derivatives). Manuscripts will be published as reviews, perspectives, regular research articles, and short communications. The primary criteria for acceptance and publication are scientific rigor and potential to advance the field.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信