机器学习模型在前列腺癌患者前列腺切除术前的临床应用。

IF 3.5 2区 医学 Q2 ONCOLOGY
Adalgisa Guerra, Matthew R Orton, Helen Wang, Marianna Konidari, Kris Maes, Nickolas K Papanikolaou, Dow Mu Koh
{"title":"机器学习模型在前列腺癌患者前列腺切除术前的临床应用。","authors":"Adalgisa Guerra, Matthew R Orton, Helen Wang, Marianna Konidari, Kris Maes, Nickolas K Papanikolaou, Dow Mu Koh","doi":"10.1186/s40644-024-00666-y","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>To build machine learning predictive models for surgical risk assessment of extracapsular extension (ECE) in patients with prostate cancer (PCa) before radical prostatectomy; and to compare the use of decision curve analysis (DCA) and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) metrics for selecting input feature combinations in models.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective observational study included two independent data sets: 139 participants from a single institution (training), and 55 from 15 other institutions (external validation), both treated with Robotic Assisted Radical Prostatectomy (RARP). Five ML models, based on different combinations of clinical, semantic (interpreted by a radiologist) and radiomics features computed from T2W-MRI images, were built to predict extracapsular extension in the prostatectomy specimen (pECE+). DCA plots were used to rank the models' net benefit when assigning patients to prostatectomy with non-nerve-sparing surgery (NNSS) or nerve-sparing surgery (NSS), depending on the predicted ECE status. DCA model rankings were compared with those drived from ROC area under the curve (AUC).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In the training data, the model using clinical, semantic, and radiomics features gave the highest net benefit values across relevant threshold probabilities, and similar decision curve was observed in the external validation data. The model ranking using the AUC was different in the discovery group and favoured the model using clinical + semantic features only.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The combined model based on clinical, semantic and radiomic features may be used to predict pECE + in patients with PCa and results in a positive net benefit when used to choose between prostatectomy with NNS or NNSS.</p>","PeriodicalId":9548,"journal":{"name":"Cancer Imaging","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10854130/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Clinical application of machine learning models in patients with prostate cancer before prostatectomy.\",\"authors\":\"Adalgisa Guerra, Matthew R Orton, Helen Wang, Marianna Konidari, Kris Maes, Nickolas K Papanikolaou, Dow Mu Koh\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s40644-024-00666-y\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>To build machine learning predictive models for surgical risk assessment of extracapsular extension (ECE) in patients with prostate cancer (PCa) before radical prostatectomy; and to compare the use of decision curve analysis (DCA) and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) metrics for selecting input feature combinations in models.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective observational study included two independent data sets: 139 participants from a single institution (training), and 55 from 15 other institutions (external validation), both treated with Robotic Assisted Radical Prostatectomy (RARP). Five ML models, based on different combinations of clinical, semantic (interpreted by a radiologist) and radiomics features computed from T2W-MRI images, were built to predict extracapsular extension in the prostatectomy specimen (pECE+). DCA plots were used to rank the models' net benefit when assigning patients to prostatectomy with non-nerve-sparing surgery (NNSS) or nerve-sparing surgery (NSS), depending on the predicted ECE status. DCA model rankings were compared with those drived from ROC area under the curve (AUC).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In the training data, the model using clinical, semantic, and radiomics features gave the highest net benefit values across relevant threshold probabilities, and similar decision curve was observed in the external validation data. The model ranking using the AUC was different in the discovery group and favoured the model using clinical + semantic features only.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The combined model based on clinical, semantic and radiomic features may be used to predict pECE + in patients with PCa and results in a positive net benefit when used to choose between prostatectomy with NNS or NNSS.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9548,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Cancer Imaging\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-02-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10854130/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Cancer Imaging\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s40644-024-00666-y\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cancer Imaging","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s40644-024-00666-y","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:建立机器学习预测模型,用于前列腺癌(PCa)患者根治性前列腺切除术前囊外扩展(ECE)的手术风险评估;比较决策曲线分析(DCA)和接收器操作特征(ROC)指标在选择模型输入特征组合时的应用:这项回顾性观察研究包括两个独立的数据集:来自一家机构的139名参与者(培训)和来自其他15家机构的55名参与者(外部验证),两者都接受了机器人辅助根治性前列腺切除术(RARP)。根据 T2W-MRI 图像计算出的临床、语义(由放射科医生解释)和放射组学特征的不同组合,建立了五个 ML 模型,用于预测前列腺切除术标本的囊外扩展(pECE+)。在根据预测的 ECE 状态将患者分配到前列腺切除术与非神经保留手术 (NNSS) 或神经保留手术 (NSS) 时,使用 DCA 图对这些模型的净获益进行排名。将 DCA 模型排名与根据 ROC 曲线下面积(AUC)得出的排名进行了比较:结果:在训练数据中,使用临床、语义和放射组学特征的模型在相关阈值概率上给出了最高的净收益值,在外部验证数据中也观察到了类似的决策曲线。在发现组中,使用 AUC 的模型排名有所不同,仅使用临床+语义特征的模型更受青睐:结论:基于临床、语义和放射学特征的组合模型可用于预测 PCa 患者的 pECE +,当用于选择 NNS 或 NNSS 的前列腺切除术时,会产生积极的净获益。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Clinical application of machine learning models in patients with prostate cancer before prostatectomy.

Background: To build machine learning predictive models for surgical risk assessment of extracapsular extension (ECE) in patients with prostate cancer (PCa) before radical prostatectomy; and to compare the use of decision curve analysis (DCA) and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) metrics for selecting input feature combinations in models.

Methods: This retrospective observational study included two independent data sets: 139 participants from a single institution (training), and 55 from 15 other institutions (external validation), both treated with Robotic Assisted Radical Prostatectomy (RARP). Five ML models, based on different combinations of clinical, semantic (interpreted by a radiologist) and radiomics features computed from T2W-MRI images, were built to predict extracapsular extension in the prostatectomy specimen (pECE+). DCA plots were used to rank the models' net benefit when assigning patients to prostatectomy with non-nerve-sparing surgery (NNSS) or nerve-sparing surgery (NSS), depending on the predicted ECE status. DCA model rankings were compared with those drived from ROC area under the curve (AUC).

Results: In the training data, the model using clinical, semantic, and radiomics features gave the highest net benefit values across relevant threshold probabilities, and similar decision curve was observed in the external validation data. The model ranking using the AUC was different in the discovery group and favoured the model using clinical + semantic features only.

Conclusions: The combined model based on clinical, semantic and radiomic features may be used to predict pECE + in patients with PCa and results in a positive net benefit when used to choose between prostatectomy with NNS or NNSS.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Cancer Imaging
Cancer Imaging ONCOLOGY-RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING
CiteScore
7.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
66
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Cancer Imaging is an open access, peer-reviewed journal publishing original articles, reviews and editorials written by expert international radiologists working in oncology. The journal encompasses CT, MR, PET, ultrasound, radionuclide and multimodal imaging in all kinds of malignant tumours, plus new developments, techniques and innovations. Topics of interest include: Breast Imaging Chest Complications of treatment Ear, Nose & Throat Gastrointestinal Hepatobiliary & Pancreatic Imaging biomarkers Interventional Lymphoma Measurement of tumour response Molecular functional imaging Musculoskeletal Neuro oncology Nuclear Medicine Paediatric.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信