用尿激酶和肝素预防透析导管故障:随机对照试验。

IF 16.4 1区 化学 Q1 CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Accounts of Chemical Research Pub Date : 2024-10-01
Quan Wang, Nan Jiang, Weidong Chen, Li Cheng, Shuai Fu, Qiang Li, Hongbo Li
{"title":"用尿激酶和肝素预防透析导管故障:随机对照试验。","authors":"Quan Wang, Nan Jiang, Weidong Chen, Li Cheng, Shuai Fu, Qiang Li, Hongbo Li","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To evaluate the effectiveness of urokinase and heparin in preventing catheter infection and dysfunction in permanent hemodialysis tunneled cuffed catheters.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We randomized 153 cases of maintenance hemodialysis patients with newly implanted permanent hemodialysis tunneled cannula catheters from November 2018 to November 2021 for this single-center prospective randomized controlled trial The eligible patients were given one of two treatment plans: Patients in the control group (73 patients) were given heparin (6260 U/mL)three times a week after hemodialysis. The intervention group (80 cases) was administered urokinase(25000 U/mL) on the basis of heparin. After six months of maintenance hemodialysis with the above sealing protocols, the primary result was the frequency of catheter malfunction, and the secondary outcome was the frequency of catheter-associated infection.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In the final analysis of 153 patients, catheter malfunctions occurred in 29 of the 80 patients assigned to heparin alone, with an incidence of 36.3%, and 16 of the 73 subjects assigned to urokinase combined with heparin, with a rate of 21.9%. This represents an almost 2-fold increase in the risk of catheter malfunction among patients treated with heparin alone as compared to those treated with urokinase once weekly (hazard ratio, 1.85; 13 patients (16.3%) allocated to heparin alone experienced catheter-related bacteremia, compared to 4 patients (5.5%) assigned to urokinase (hazard ratio, 2.79; 95%CI, 1.08 to 7.22; P = .03). Baseline levels, and adverse events, including bleeding incidents, did not statistically differ between the two groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Urokinase can be used as a secondary prevention drug for long-term catheter malfunction and infection based on its cheapness, efficacy, and safety, which can effectively save medical costs, and its sealing protocol is simple and suitable for promotion.</p>","PeriodicalId":1,"journal":{"name":"Accounts of Chemical Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":16.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Prevention of Dialysis Catheter Malfunction with Urokinase and Heparin: A Randomized, Controlled Trial.\",\"authors\":\"Quan Wang, Nan Jiang, Weidong Chen, Li Cheng, Shuai Fu, Qiang Li, Hongbo Li\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To evaluate the effectiveness of urokinase and heparin in preventing catheter infection and dysfunction in permanent hemodialysis tunneled cuffed catheters.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We randomized 153 cases of maintenance hemodialysis patients with newly implanted permanent hemodialysis tunneled cannula catheters from November 2018 to November 2021 for this single-center prospective randomized controlled trial The eligible patients were given one of two treatment plans: Patients in the control group (73 patients) were given heparin (6260 U/mL)three times a week after hemodialysis. The intervention group (80 cases) was administered urokinase(25000 U/mL) on the basis of heparin. After six months of maintenance hemodialysis with the above sealing protocols, the primary result was the frequency of catheter malfunction, and the secondary outcome was the frequency of catheter-associated infection.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In the final analysis of 153 patients, catheter malfunctions occurred in 29 of the 80 patients assigned to heparin alone, with an incidence of 36.3%, and 16 of the 73 subjects assigned to urokinase combined with heparin, with a rate of 21.9%. This represents an almost 2-fold increase in the risk of catheter malfunction among patients treated with heparin alone as compared to those treated with urokinase once weekly (hazard ratio, 1.85; 13 patients (16.3%) allocated to heparin alone experienced catheter-related bacteremia, compared to 4 patients (5.5%) assigned to urokinase (hazard ratio, 2.79; 95%CI, 1.08 to 7.22; P = .03). Baseline levels, and adverse events, including bleeding incidents, did not statistically differ between the two groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Urokinase can be used as a secondary prevention drug for long-term catheter malfunction and infection based on its cheapness, efficacy, and safety, which can effectively save medical costs, and its sealing protocol is simple and suitable for promotion.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":1,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Accounts of Chemical Research\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":16.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Accounts of Chemical Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"化学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Accounts of Chemical Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"化学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的评估尿激酶和肝素预防永久性血液透析隧道套管导管感染和功能障碍的有效性:2018年11月至2021年11月,我们随机选取了153例新植入永久性血液透析隧道式套管导管的维持性血液透析患者,进行了这项单中心前瞻性随机对照试验。符合条件的患者被给予两种治疗方案中的一种:对照组患者(73 例)在血液透析后给予肝素(6260 U/mL),每周三次。干预组(80 例)在肝素基础上给予尿激酶(25000 U/mL)。采用上述密封方案进行维持性血液透析 6 个月后,主要结果为导管故障频率,次要结果为导管相关感染频率:在对 153 名患者进行的最终分析中,在 80 名被分配单独使用肝素的患者中,有 29 人发生导管故障,发生率为 36.3%;在 73 名被分配使用尿激酶联合肝素的患者中,有 16 人发生导管故障,发生率为 21.9%。与每周一次使用尿激酶的患者相比,单用肝素的患者发生导管故障的风险增加了近 2 倍(危险比为 1.85;13 名单用肝素的患者(16.3%)发生导管相关菌血症,而 4 名使用尿激酶的患者(5.5%)发生导管相关菌血症(危险比为 2.79;95%CI,1.08 至 7.22;P = .03))。两组患者的基线水平和不良事件(包括出血事件)在统计学上没有差异:结论:尿激酶价格低廉、疗效显著、安全性高,可作为长期导管故障和感染的二级预防药物,有效节约医疗成本,且其封管方案简单,适合推广。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Prevention of Dialysis Catheter Malfunction with Urokinase and Heparin: A Randomized, Controlled Trial.

Objective: To evaluate the effectiveness of urokinase and heparin in preventing catheter infection and dysfunction in permanent hemodialysis tunneled cuffed catheters.

Methods: We randomized 153 cases of maintenance hemodialysis patients with newly implanted permanent hemodialysis tunneled cannula catheters from November 2018 to November 2021 for this single-center prospective randomized controlled trial The eligible patients were given one of two treatment plans: Patients in the control group (73 patients) were given heparin (6260 U/mL)three times a week after hemodialysis. The intervention group (80 cases) was administered urokinase(25000 U/mL) on the basis of heparin. After six months of maintenance hemodialysis with the above sealing protocols, the primary result was the frequency of catheter malfunction, and the secondary outcome was the frequency of catheter-associated infection.

Results: In the final analysis of 153 patients, catheter malfunctions occurred in 29 of the 80 patients assigned to heparin alone, with an incidence of 36.3%, and 16 of the 73 subjects assigned to urokinase combined with heparin, with a rate of 21.9%. This represents an almost 2-fold increase in the risk of catheter malfunction among patients treated with heparin alone as compared to those treated with urokinase once weekly (hazard ratio, 1.85; 13 patients (16.3%) allocated to heparin alone experienced catheter-related bacteremia, compared to 4 patients (5.5%) assigned to urokinase (hazard ratio, 2.79; 95%CI, 1.08 to 7.22; P = .03). Baseline levels, and adverse events, including bleeding incidents, did not statistically differ between the two groups.

Conclusion: Urokinase can be used as a secondary prevention drug for long-term catheter malfunction and infection based on its cheapness, efficacy, and safety, which can effectively save medical costs, and its sealing protocol is simple and suitable for promotion.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Accounts of Chemical Research
Accounts of Chemical Research 化学-化学综合
CiteScore
31.40
自引率
1.10%
发文量
312
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: Accounts of Chemical Research presents short, concise and critical articles offering easy-to-read overviews of basic research and applications in all areas of chemistry and biochemistry. These short reviews focus on research from the author’s own laboratory and are designed to teach the reader about a research project. In addition, Accounts of Chemical Research publishes commentaries that give an informed opinion on a current research problem. Special Issues online are devoted to a single topic of unusual activity and significance. Accounts of Chemical Research replaces the traditional article abstract with an article "Conspectus." These entries synopsize the research affording the reader a closer look at the content and significance of an article. Through this provision of a more detailed description of the article contents, the Conspectus enhances the article's discoverability by search engines and the exposure for the research.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信