Measurement and optimisation of the perceptual equivalence of the Dutch consonant-vowel-consonant (CVC) word lists using synthetic speech and list pairs.

Objectives: (1) to determine whether the standard Dutch word lists for speech audiometry are equally intelligible in normal-hearing listeners (Experiment 1), (2) to investigate whether synthetic speech can be used to create word lists (Experiment 1) and (3) to determine whether the list effect found in Experiment 1 can be reduced by combining two lists into pairs (Experiment 2).

Design: Participants performed speech tests in quiet with the original (natural) and synthetic word lists (Experiment 1.). In Experiment 2, new participants performed speech tests with list pairs from the original lists constructed from the results of Experiment 1.

Study samples: Twenty-four and twenty-eight normal-hearing adults.

Results: There was a significant list effect in the natural speech lists; not in the synthetic speech lists. Variability in intelligibility was significantly higher in the former, with list differences up to 20% at fixed presentation levels. The 95% confidence interval of a list with a score of approximately 70% is around 10%-points wider than of a list pair.

Conclusions: The original Dutch word lists show large variations in intelligibility. List effects can be reduced by combining two lists per condition. Synthetic speech is a promising alternative to natural speech in speech audiometry in quiet.