胎儿护理中心 "以人为本 "护理量表的开发与验证。

IF 1.6 3区 医学 Q3 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY
Fetal Diagnosis and Therapy Pub Date : 2024-01-01 Epub Date: 2024-02-07 DOI:10.1159/000537691
Abigail Wilpers, Marney White, Mary T Austin, Mert Ozan Bahtiyar, Katie Francis, Stephen P Emery, Diane Wall, Lonnie Somers, Charlotte Wool
{"title":"胎儿护理中心 \"以人为本 \"护理量表的开发与验证。","authors":"Abigail Wilpers, Marney White, Mary T Austin, Mert Ozan Bahtiyar, Katie Francis, Stephen P Emery, Diane Wall, Lonnie Somers, Charlotte Wool","doi":"10.1159/000537691","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Fetal care centers (FCCs) in the USA lack a standardized instrument to measure person-centered care. This study aimed to develop and validate the Person-Centered Care in Fetal Care Centers (PCC-FCC) Scale.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Initial items were developed based on literature and input from clinicians and former patients. A Delphi study involving 16 experts was conducted to validate the content and construct. Through three rounds of online questionnaires using open-ended questions and Likert scales, consensus on item clarity and relevancy was established. The resulting items were then piloted with former fetal care center patients via a web-based survey. The instrument's reliability and validity were validated using Cronbach's α and exploratory factor analysis, respectively. Concurrent validity was assessed by comparing scores with the Revised Patient Perception of Patient-Centeredness (PPPC-R) Questionnaire.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>258 participants completed the 48-item pilot PCC-FCC survey, categorized into six domains. Factor analysis yielded a 2-factor, 28-item scale. Internal consistency of the final scale had good reliability (α = 0.969). Data supported content, construct, and concurrent validity.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The PCC-FCC Scale is a reliable and valid measure of person-centered care in U.S. FCCs. It can be used to enhance services and begin connecting person-centered care to maternal-child health outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":12189,"journal":{"name":"Fetal Diagnosis and Therapy","volume":" ","pages":"243-254"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11147688/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Development and Validation of a Scale to Measure Person-Centered Care in Fetal Care Centers.\",\"authors\":\"Abigail Wilpers, Marney White, Mary T Austin, Mert Ozan Bahtiyar, Katie Francis, Stephen P Emery, Diane Wall, Lonnie Somers, Charlotte Wool\",\"doi\":\"10.1159/000537691\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Fetal care centers (FCCs) in the USA lack a standardized instrument to measure person-centered care. This study aimed to develop and validate the Person-Centered Care in Fetal Care Centers (PCC-FCC) Scale.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Initial items were developed based on literature and input from clinicians and former patients. A Delphi study involving 16 experts was conducted to validate the content and construct. Through three rounds of online questionnaires using open-ended questions and Likert scales, consensus on item clarity and relevancy was established. The resulting items were then piloted with former fetal care center patients via a web-based survey. The instrument's reliability and validity were validated using Cronbach's α and exploratory factor analysis, respectively. Concurrent validity was assessed by comparing scores with the Revised Patient Perception of Patient-Centeredness (PPPC-R) Questionnaire.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>258 participants completed the 48-item pilot PCC-FCC survey, categorized into six domains. Factor analysis yielded a 2-factor, 28-item scale. Internal consistency of the final scale had good reliability (α = 0.969). Data supported content, construct, and concurrent validity.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The PCC-FCC Scale is a reliable and valid measure of person-centered care in U.S. FCCs. It can be used to enhance services and begin connecting person-centered care to maternal-child health outcomes.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12189,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Fetal Diagnosis and Therapy\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"243-254\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11147688/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Fetal Diagnosis and Therapy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1159/000537691\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/2/7 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Fetal Diagnosis and Therapy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000537691","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/2/7 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

导言:美国的胎儿监护中心(FCC)缺乏衡量以人为本的护理的标准化工具。本研究旨在开发并验证胎儿监护中心以人为本的护理(PCC-FCC)量表:方法:根据文献以及临床医生和既往患者的意见开发了初始项目。为了验证量表的内容和结构,16 位专家参与了德尔菲研究。通过三轮使用开放式问题和李克特量表的在线问卷调查,就项目的清晰度和相关性达成了共识。然后,通过网络调查对前胎儿护理中心的患者进行了试用。该工具的信度和效度分别通过 Cronbach's α 和探索性因子分析进行了验证。结果:258 名参与者完成了 48 个项目的 PCC-FCC 试点调查,调查分为六个领域。因子分析得出了一个 2 个因子、28 个项目的量表。最终量表的内部一致性具有良好的可靠性(α=0.969)。数据支持内容效度、结构效度和并发效度:PCC-FCC 量表是衡量美国家庭护理中心以人为本的可靠而有效的方法。它可用于加强服务,并开始将以人为本的护理与母婴健康结果联系起来。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Development and Validation of a Scale to Measure Person-Centered Care in Fetal Care Centers.

Introduction: Fetal care centers (FCCs) in the USA lack a standardized instrument to measure person-centered care. This study aimed to develop and validate the Person-Centered Care in Fetal Care Centers (PCC-FCC) Scale.

Methods: Initial items were developed based on literature and input from clinicians and former patients. A Delphi study involving 16 experts was conducted to validate the content and construct. Through three rounds of online questionnaires using open-ended questions and Likert scales, consensus on item clarity and relevancy was established. The resulting items were then piloted with former fetal care center patients via a web-based survey. The instrument's reliability and validity were validated using Cronbach's α and exploratory factor analysis, respectively. Concurrent validity was assessed by comparing scores with the Revised Patient Perception of Patient-Centeredness (PPPC-R) Questionnaire.

Results: 258 participants completed the 48-item pilot PCC-FCC survey, categorized into six domains. Factor analysis yielded a 2-factor, 28-item scale. Internal consistency of the final scale had good reliability (α = 0.969). Data supported content, construct, and concurrent validity.

Conclusion: The PCC-FCC Scale is a reliable and valid measure of person-centered care in U.S. FCCs. It can be used to enhance services and begin connecting person-centered care to maternal-child health outcomes.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Fetal Diagnosis and Therapy
Fetal Diagnosis and Therapy 医学-妇产科学
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
9.10%
发文量
48
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The first journal to focus on the fetus as a patient, ''Fetal Diagnosis and Therapy'' provides a wide range of biomedical specialists with a single source of reports encompassing the common discipline of fetal medicine.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信